English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

25 answers

Nope...if there is, you can show me.

2006-09-19 02:20:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes God is our chief eng Look at our genetic configuration it did not happen by accident. A simular compareson would to find a 100 grains of sand stacked in a sequence. U are not an accident. Some think that cloneing is great but a simple Geico has been doing it for hundred's of years,and look at the problems it causes for them.
One of the most outstandimg is our atsmosphere .We must have ox. and in normal air it is 20.9% ,now if N.A.S.A had designed it it would have a plus or minus of 5%. On the low side is 19.5% and just below that u would pass out. if u go on the high side at 23% like on the inside of an ox. tent everything will burn like gas is on it.
The earth has been recycleing our life support for millions of yr. and there is no place where the CO2 has increased enough to cause death , The envirementalest would tell u that the CO2 has increased 30% but if u measure it is only 1 to 2 parts per million. where did it all go ??? Well the chief eng. had the green plants take over and recycle the CO2 to ox. is this an accident ??
Knowing that we are on a long trip what will we do when our ox. is all gone ?? well he gave us a great reserve it is called nitrigen u say that is nothing as it is inert and affects almost nothing. Wrong it is 78% of our atmosphere and when it is in the upper atmosphere and bomberded by alpha particles it transmutates from nitrogen to Ox. which gives us another reserve.
Learn that God wants us all to treateach other like u want to be treated. Is there anything wrong with that ???

2006-09-19 10:01:36 · answer #2 · answered by JOHNNIE B 7 · 1 0

From the Enlightenment on, science, at least in part, has applied itself to seeking an explanation of the world in which God would be unnecessary. And if this were so, he would also become unnecessary in our lives. But whenever the attempt seemed to be nearing success - inevitably it would become clear: something is missing from the equation! When God is subtracted, something doesn't add up for man, the world, the whole vast universe. So we end up with two alternatives. What came first? Creative Reason, the Spirit who makes all things and gives them growth, or Unreason, which, lacking any meaning, yet somehow brings forth a mathematically ordered cosmos, as well as man and his reason. The latter, however, would then be nothing more than a chance result of evolution and thus, in the end, equally meaningless.

2006-09-19 22:39:15 · answer #3 · answered by MorgantonNC 4 · 0 0

well if you dotn believe in God - why do you celebrate Chritmas-easter etc, plus the calender began at the crucifixion of christ, then there's the bible - even the Koran,recognises that jesus existed although they believe he was just a prophet) and that Mohammed is god so already we have many, collaborations that jesus existed, and the apostles wrote down their accounts, and this was well before David Blane/and Tv';s special effects. You asked the question of asking for scientific proof of God's existence - can you provide scientific proof - that God did not - and Does not exist? he only scientific experiment I suggest you take, is for the whole world to get down on their knees and ask God to come into their lives and for Gods spirit (the holy spirit) to move amongst them and to touch the their lives- and take a poll at the end of it and ask at the end of it who out of all of them (by taking a survey or using some other measurable instrument)and say to, whom felt that they'd felt touched by the presence of God, and months aon ask about what if any relationship they had built up with jesus.

I suppose another way of scientific proving God actually exists, is when you look at the book of revelations in the bible and it talk of Jesus coming again, -will that be proof for you?

2006-09-21 19:30:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

God exists. Scientific proof? Look at the design of this universe. Everything has been designed to perfection. Earth is at a position such that conditions are optimal for lfe sustenance. If it had been just a bit more closer or futher away from the sun, it would have been a burning ball of fire or a icy rocky planet.

The earth spins. Why? The centripetal force created is waht we know as gravitational pull. So i ask u. Does god exist?

God exists everywhere. The planets circle the sun in the cosmos. In us, in each living cell, in each atom, we have electrons circulating the nucleus. If god exists in the cosmos, then god exists in us as well.

2006-09-19 10:27:52 · answer #5 · answered by Theeva 2 · 1 0

There is no scientific proof of God's existence.

Of course there could be. If Biblical-type events started happening in real life (angles with flaming swords, God smiting the city walls of our enemies, laying waste to wicked cities, and personally taking an interest in our legal system) then it would not be intellectually coherent to dismiss the Bible as legends of unsophisticated tribal people, and a reassessment of atheism would be in order.

The great thing about modern science is that it makes atheism possible for honest people of good will, by providing at least the possibility of natural explanations for the world. It thereby frees us from superstition and belief in supernatural beings. IMHO, these beliefs are the greatest obstacle to human progress and happiness.

2006-09-19 11:53:04 · answer #6 · answered by cosmo 7 · 1 0

If there was we sure would know about it. I feel that God is an invention of the human mind that none scientists use to explain the reason for life. It's far easier to say that God made life, than to study what really happened scientifically. However, having said that, something must have happened long ago in our past, to put this idea of a God in our heads.

2006-09-21 23:38:20 · answer #7 · answered by Dr David 6 · 0 0

The fact that we are alive is proof that God exists. There are just too many coincidences in Evolution to say that it just happened. Pure luck that conditions were just right on this planet to support life? Pure luck that apes became humans? Where is this missing link? Just look around you. Science leaves a dam site more questions unanswered about how we got here than the Bible does. I just battle to believe that my ancestors were once amoeba's, fish or monkeys. It is also too much of a stretch of my imagination to believe that the miracle of life was just random chance. How many women give birth every day, and how many of thos babies are born with deformities? How can those statistics be down to chance.

The answer is obvious. God exists. He created the Universe, the Earth, and us, just like The Bible says.

2006-09-19 11:02:47 · answer #8 · answered by john841722 1 · 1 0

Of course not! otherwise there would be a hell of a lot more believers. Dunmbass!

Why do you think it is called faith? You have to have faith in your religion without any evidence in the slightest to suggest that anything your religion teaches you is true, blind faith you might say.

Also the whole scientific community would be shouting and running around if they had proved the existence of god as this would also have disproved many firm held beliefs of the scientific community.



P.S. I stick with science over religion due to the fact that it is infinitely more provable and people do not use science as an excuse to be nasty to each other in the same way they do with religion.

2006-09-19 09:30:35 · answer #9 · answered by StoneWeasel 2 · 0 1

Could evolution be God tweaking his design?
Did an earlier race create the big bang by smashing atoms together in a lab like CERN but on a bigger scale?
Did this bang wake up God who spent 6 days building stuff out of the resulting mess?
Why do religious people complain about scientists playing god?
If god made us in his own image, surely he had high hopes for us and to follow in his foot steps!

Too many questions, not enough answers, just like life.

2006-09-21 10:28:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I do. There doesn't have to be though; there isn't even scientifical evidence for the declaration of the TRUE beginnings of our own universe, so in that sense, not having scientifical proof of God means nothing as to the soundness of his existence in the first place.

If something as mortal and as fragile as science cannot explain other things just as moretal and fragile surrounding the observer who instigates the science, it cannot even be thought to go as far as to disprove something immortal, something divine, something holy.

People will and forever never figure to understand that.

2006-09-19 11:14:06 · answer #11 · answered by Angela 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers