Politics - 31 December 2007

2007-12-31 10:58:12 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

the link works

http://bulletins.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=bulletin.read&messageID=5107131208&MyToken=9e45fa8d-fcdf-433e-a8f2-2d9fbae547d5

2007-12-31 10:57:22 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Government and it's agents are free to lie to the Citizens of the United States at their will or pleasure.

2007-12-31 10:52:55 · 13 answers · asked by Guerilla Liberal fighter 3

2007-12-31 10:51:01 · 19 answers · asked by yrag 1

2007-12-31 10:48:22 · 13 answers · asked by Guerilla Liberal fighter 3

2007-12-31 10:46:13 · 18 answers · asked by . 5

get the taxes back on the fuel I have used in my boat, snowmobile, lawn mover, weed wacker, etc. My understanding is that the tax's are to be used for the roads and none of these have been used on a road?

I have used over 1300 gallons on these items and I have the receipts.

2007-12-31 10:35:25 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-31 10:22:51 · 9 answers · asked by jimmy 1

America didn't knock down the towers - Islamic radicals did. Now I'm seeing questions implying that Clinton somehow was responsible for the trajedy in Waco - a tragedy clearly orchestrated and carried out by David Koresh and the Branch Davidians. For 51 days, federal agents and professional negotiators tried everything humanly possible to bring this standoff to a peaceful conclusion.
"On July 21, 2000, after a 10 month investigation, Danforth issued a preliminary report exonerating the government and its agents. His report concluded that federal agents did not start the fire, direct gunfire at the complex, or improperly employ US armed forces. Danforth assigned responsibility for the tragedy to the Branch Davidians and David Koresh. They contributed to the tragedy by refusing to exit the compound during the 51 day standoff, directing gunfire at FBI agents, shooting members of the compound, and ultimately setting the fire that burned the compound down.

Why is that so hard to accept?

2007-12-31 10:21:30 · 13 answers · asked by LeAnne 7

Identity cards...who wants them? Vote `yes` or `no` please.

2007-12-31 10:18:27 · 30 answers · asked by B0uncingMoonman@aol.com 7

Political assassinations have gone on a long time; whether it be attempted or succeeding in them. Fidel Castro, Saddam Hussein, Stalin, Pol Pot, Kim Jong Il.. to name a few have had been the subject of assassination attempts by the American government and other nations as well.

Are governments "allowed" to do this?

2007-12-31 10:13:51 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-31 10:13:18 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

"You can call us rednecks if you want-we're not offended, because we know what we're all about. We get up and go to work, we get up and go to church, and we get up and go to war when necessary."

-- Jeff Foxworthy"

2007-12-31 10:01:11 · 13 answers · asked by Yahoo Answer Angel 6

then to drive godless liberals even crazier for eight long years?

Bonus question:
How soon do you think the censorship loving liberals will have this question deleted?

2007-12-31 09:56:05 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-31 09:53:53 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

now when any real Christian tries to run for office the liberals have ingeniously twisted separation of church and state into separation of church FROM state. They have no problem with people running who claim to be Christian but dont follow it, or someone who will denie their belief, because they ignorantly think the person will be more Liberal. Don't they realize the person could just as likely be a fascist? I am an agnostic and dont believe in religion. I would rather someone in office who admits their beliefs. Besides there bigotry is very disturbing. You cant run for office because you're a christian. What next can't vote either?

2007-12-31 09:47:24 · 11 answers · asked by wisemancumth 5

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/31/world/africa/31prison.html?ex=1356757200&en=080416e7ee35dbae&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

2007-12-31 09:40:14 · 8 answers · asked by Yahoo Answer Angel 6

... and with tanks and incendiary devices to "save" those kids?

2007-12-31 09:30:05 · 13 answers · asked by Duminos 2

2007-12-31 09:29:49 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-31 09:25:01 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

1) Eliminating the IRS - this would be awesome, no doubt, but the consequences would be - interest rates soar - after all, if there is no money to pay the interest on the bonds, why would foreign holders continue to hold our debt?.....the stock market declines nicely, perhaps 30-40% (maybe more) because the ability for our government to issue debt is vital for our economy....the dollar plummets further, perhaps to $4/euro, why? well when those foreign debt holders dump our bonds they will sell dollars and buy back their currency. 2) the elimination of the federal reserve......with no lender of last resort who would prevent runs on our banks when there is a mad rush to convert meaningless paper assets to gold 3) putting us back on the gold standard would cause mass inflation while the economy plunges into recession because no money to back our bonds and no fed to rescue the banks, everything of real value rises - gold, wheat , oil.... no way he could do it even 2 terms

2007-12-31 09:10:07 · 20 answers · asked by james_r_keene 2

As soon as negotiations to trade oil for Euro's was discussed the United States secured 1/3 of the worlds known oil supplies by invading Iraq .

2007-12-31 08:58:14 · 6 answers · asked by TroubleMaker 5

WELL SHE WANTED TO BUY THE BEST ARMOR CAR AND THEY REFUSE TO SALE TO HER

2007-12-31 08:56:02 · 2 answers · asked by joshua g 1

In theory liberalism is a good idea. It's a noble concept to want to help people who can't help themselves. But I think modern liberals have went to far in pandering to minorities, & trying to give them artificial rights. I think liberal policies like affirmative action, & people like Al Sharpton & Jesse Jackson really just create more racism & division in American society. Hate crime legislation was designed to protect minorities from biased crimes. I think it's stupid that there are special presidential debates for black & hispanic issues. I don't think minorities should be given special treatment because they are minorities. If you give special protection, privileges, rights, or advantages to people who aren't white, doesn't that cause discrimination against people who are white?

2007-12-31 08:44:48 · 20 answers · asked by James 3

We need to vote the bums out. The democrats had their chance to make things better and they blew it, so now its time for the GOP to take the rains, and lead America back into prosperity, since the Dems took it away from us, sadly.

2007-12-31 08:36:09 · 15 answers · asked by patriot_watcher 1

Just look what he does when he goes on vacation, he works at his ranch, hauling brush and stumps. The man never gets tired of hard work, and that is a sign of a moral, honest, and good man.

At least he sticks up for the working people, where as liberals put them down, fact.

2007-12-31 08:26:11 · 42 answers · asked by patriot_watcher 1

"May your God, Gods, or lack thereof, bless you in all of your walks of life."


(by the way, I'm not representing Obama when I say this. This is just a question that I personally have)


Would this bother you? Offend you?


Thanks.

2007-12-31 08:21:38 · 47 answers · asked by ... 4

2007-12-31 08:20:37 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

It looks as if the GOP will definitely regain the Congress, and keep the White House. Again, liberals were wrong and now America supports the GOP to the fullest extent, fact.

2007-12-31 08:17:30 · 17 answers · asked by patriot_watcher 1

2007-12-31 08:02:18 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous