Politics - 16 December 2007

how does one make a donation to their cause, or volunteer to help?

2007-12-16 16:59:27 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Hi, I'm moving to Cali next year, and I heard that basically everyone is Liberal, and was just wondering if this is true because I am pretty conservative. I don't mind it being mixed, because otherwise everyone would be the same and there would be nothing to debate about. But I'm worried now that I'll get over there and like everybody is going to be liberal and that they won't like anyone who isn't. Is this how it is?

2007-12-16 16:57:58 · 16 answers · asked by Joie 4

No fair looking it up. Guess if you don't know. It's just for fun.

2007-12-16 16:43:34 · 10 answers · asked by Matt V 2

If I had never met you and told you I was a Democrat, what assumptions would you make about my beliefs and lifestyle?

Please don't respond with what you'd think about my intelligence or character.

2007-12-16 16:25:47 · 19 answers · asked by Moxor Alerris Anderbone 2

Thank God for the BBC:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7139974.stm

2007-12-16 16:12:27 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

I attend university of florida. A student I know told me someone sent him an email saying he was a fat ugly nerd and they did not include a threat. yet he wants to report the incident to the dean office.

2007-12-16 16:11:14 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

What does the future hold for the 'nation state' as we know it?

It will probably always be around, at least nominally.

Will it still be around in the coming centuries, or will the world simply be made up of market systems like the EU, etc?

2007-12-16 15:58:58 · 4 answers · asked by Zezo Zeze Zadfrack 1

Is the whole nuclear issue over with Iran?

Or will they still have to be dealt with in the near future?

2007-12-16 15:47:53 · 10 answers · asked by Zezo Zeze Zadfrack 1

Is it what we are heading for? Will we all be under one government? Will this bring world peace? Or civil war? Some believe that immigration, globalisation and being politically correct is getting future generations ready for new world order.

The perennial U.S. presidential candidate Lyndon LaRouche claims that the "New World Order" is a conspiracy directed by the House of Windsor (the British royal family), which, he asserts, also controls the international Illegal drug trade. He claims the Fabian Society (of which H.G. Wells was a member) was secretly financed by the Royal Family so that the Windsors could gain control of the eventual world government. LaRouche asserts that as of 2006 the Neo-Conservatives (especially Dick Cheney) are working with the House of Windsor to set up a type of fascism throughout the world which LaRouche calls synarchism and which, he claims, the Neo-Conservatives hope will become the basis of the New World Order [15]. US President George W Bush and retired British Prime Minister Tony Blair are thought to have initiated NWO

2007-12-16 15:31:32 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

I need to discuss modern-day individuals who are traitors to either their politcal party, family, or country. This is for a project on the 32nd Canto of Dante's inferno; basically I need to know some modern day persons who would be damned int the ninth circle of hell.

These people are, again, traitors to country, family, or political party.

Any suggestions? Clinton, bin Laden, Hussein, Hitler, and George W. Bush are off limits.

Thanks!

2007-12-16 15:15:04 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Since I plan to give much of it to charity anyway, what is wrong with preferring more efficient private charities?

2007-12-16 15:00:32 · 19 answers · asked by WJ 7

Maybe someday they'll have the courage to step off the Limbaugh Ridge compound and join the rest of us in Western civilisation.

2007-12-16 14:34:13 · 13 answers · asked by brickity hussein brack 5

Hi, I started this blog about 2 weeks ago, and I'd like opinions. Please tell me what you like, and what you think I can do to improve it, thanks.
any comments are very much appreciated

http://indisputabletruth.wordpress.com/

(If I'm breaking any rules yahoo...then please don't delete it, your rules are too strict anyways)

2007-12-16 14:28:29 · 4 answers · asked by Darin D 2

I have noticed how liberally biased Yahoo is. Have you?

2007-12-16 14:22:13 · 17 answers · asked by Bloake 1

shouldnt it be secular??????

2007-12-16 14:20:28 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

If charity returned to private organizations and the churches, welfare recipients would most likely not have the same standard of living. Does that imply that the current government welfare programs are ultimately NOT the "will of the people".

2007-12-16 14:01:35 · 14 answers · asked by Radman 3

world countries, how they promote freedom above dictatorships?

2007-12-16 13:58:16 · 9 answers · asked by Locutus1of1 5

I loved the comedy of the old boards, These new ones have me shaking my man boobs in anger!

2007-12-16 13:51:39 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

should I report this to the Department of Homeland Security?

2007-12-16 13:31:31 · 16 answers · asked by vegaswoman 6

Iraq didn't attack us. It is by the authority of the United Nations that we have the right to be there, killing Iraqis in the name of "national security."

Does this seem like a double standard? Hate the U.N., enjoy the authority it gives us?

2007-12-16 13:28:04 · 11 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6

2007-12-16 13:16:32 · 9 answers · asked by Mike M 1

Christianity preaches 'turning your other cheek'. In a sense, a Christian nation can not invade another nation, and can not defend itself by causing aggression on its perpetrators?

2007-12-16 13:15:45 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think Pres Bush will ever know the difference?

2007-12-16 13:10:44 · 14 answers · asked by Dream Realized 2

...oil and to enrich the military industrial complex...

...Many of you would support that, wouldn't you? In spite of all the lives lost, many Republicans would still support the war, even for those reasons, wouldn't they?

2007-12-16 12:50:41 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Summary: observational data do not support the greenhouse models of "global warming" as something caused by humans burning fossil fuels. Rather, the data strongly suggest these models are useless.

It is much more likely that the current experience of climate change is caused by subtle variations in solar magnetic fields which impact cloud formation and thus the amount of heat the Earth gains from the sun.

Read Yahoo's summary here [from the original British Journal in which it was published.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071216/ts_alt_afp/usclimatewarmingdenial

Can you say that the US Senate was right to refuse the Kyoto treaty? And that President Bush is right to refuse to negotiate rigid standards for something that doesn't need doing? [or worse -- would simply made us all poorer while accomplishing nothing?]

Let's hear a round of applause for America -- where [this time] the politicians refused to be stampeded into ill-conceived legislation. 8-)

2007-12-16 12:46:30 · 11 answers · asked by Spock (rhp) 7

i am so glade i did not vote for those liars ... it seems everyday a new lie is being exposed starting with Bush's WMD's

2007-12-16 12:38:39 · 17 answers · asked by trustluvlove 1

That they scream in outrage about abortion = murder but not about Insurance Corp Tyranny = murder PROVES that the Religious Right is neither.

2007-12-16 12:24:31 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

how how those tax cuts for rich people working out for you

2007-12-16 12:16:30 · 10 answers · asked by i_think_its_me_17 2

office?

How stupid are you?


.

2007-12-16 12:06:06 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-12-16 11:55:21 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous