Politics - 29 November 2007

2007-11-29 04:56:45 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

Finding solution not just talking about it !!!!

2007-11-29 04:55:33 · 5 answers · asked by the beav 2

Would you vote for Mike Huckabee?

Why or why not?

2007-11-29 04:51:08 · 14 answers · asked by nothing 5

and for that matter why is it that a national energy plan to wean us from fossil fuel say within the next 25 years is still not happened?
Isn't that what leadership is supposed to mean...that you look ahead and make plans for the future?

2007-11-29 04:45:09 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

The official name of the party of the Democrats is "The Democratic Party". Why do conservitives use the term "democrat" as an adjective when it should be "democratic"? As in "democrat senator - vs democratic senator. If they're going to do that, shouldn't they also use it the same way with republicans: republic senator vs republican senator?

And why did they start doing that any? Are they afraid calling someone "democratic" makes them sound more positive.

2007-11-29 04:43:44 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

She presets the questions she is asked so she always has the perfect answer.
She sets the questions to all of her opponents (both left and right) to screw them up.
When found out time and again she suddenly knows nothing.
Top notch politician material here.

2007-11-29 04:41:04 · 27 answers · asked by Bleh! 6

The Fairness Doctrine, despite its name, gives Americans a raw deal. The Federal Communications Commission created it in 1949 to require broadcasters to present both sides of any controversial issue that they touched on. Sounds … well, fair, right? Except for two major problems. One is practical -- it makes for boring radio and TV. Why? Because broadcasters responded to the Fairness Doctrine predictably: Realizing that it would be extraordinarily difficult to ensure that each issue was treated in perfect balance, they opted in large measure to steer clear of controversial topics. After all, there’s only one way to guarantee that no one is offended by what you say … and that’s to say nothingThe other problem is a little something known as the First Amendment. Where, pray tell, is it written in the Constitution that we must exercise our free speech in a “balanced” way? Sorry, but the kind of robust debate that our Founding Fathers had in mind when they wrote the Constitution.

2007-11-29 04:40:49 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

What woul;d be the reason for it?

2007-11-29 04:36:21 · 21 answers · asked by toughguy2 7

Do you think he has a hidden agenda? what does he have to lose? It's not like he can get re-elected....

2007-11-29 04:34:34 · 9 answers · asked by splatterdraven 2

Citgo is run by Hugo "Friend of Hollywod" Chavez. If we stop buying Citgo gas, he doesn't make a dime from us, and he loses the power to manipulate his country and kill those who don't support him. Do all of us want to end a dictatorship without one shot being fired?

2007-11-29 04:29:46 · 10 answers · asked by mbush40 6

HIT?

Kind of makes one think who's really supporting her?

2007-11-29 04:26:51 · 4 answers · asked by Johnny 7

2007-11-29 04:22:14 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

He might speak his mind like a man should but I've never seen him flipflop.

2007-11-29 04:15:20 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you wish for America to have a presidency that sympathizes with Chavez?

http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2007/11/28/chavez-wife.html?ref=rss

2007-11-29 04:03:49 · 12 answers · asked by Liability Of The Left III 2

Help me out here.

Which comes first?

Isn't this Rush Limbaugh's entire schtick?

2007-11-29 04:03:34 · 17 answers · asked by Dastardly 6

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23423342-details/Teddy+bear+teacher+appears+in+court+as+Islamic+fanatics+demand+execution/article.do

Do you want these kind of fanatics able to attack the USA?

2007-11-29 04:02:48 · 9 answers · asked by Uncle Pennybags 7

Is that why Pelosi and Hillary support illegals so much?

2007-11-29 04:01:48 · 5 answers · asked by How Big is Your Govt Check 3

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/071129/economy.html?.v=35

2007-11-29 03:59:59 · 20 answers · asked by Uncle Pennybags 7

I do, after coming on here....these are some of the weakest arguments I have ever seen...everything is a liberal conspiracy...I always thought Rush was hilarious with his ridiculous arguments, but some of the people on here make him look educated.

2007-11-29 03:58:41 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

Keith Kerr, the gay soldier that had the floor for 5 mins was determined by CNN to be a Hillary plant after the debate of course.

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=2196

2007-11-29 03:56:10 · 22 answers · asked by mbush40 6

Is That not Absurd???
WHy Why should she be able to inact a law that tell employers and fines them after the employees had a year to learn English that they can not fire those employees for not learning English???

2007-11-29 03:47:33 · 19 answers · asked by My Baby! 7

2007-11-29 03:40:16 · 20 answers · asked by Imperial American 1

I don't usually complain, but not asking clear questions is also a violation. I guess it's easier to report someone asking for a link, than to actually provide a link.

2007-11-29 03:37:07 · 10 answers · asked by mbush40 6

2007-11-29 03:36:28 · 11 answers · asked by Brandon 1

To overturn the 22nd amendment to the Constitution

and

To elect President George W. Bush as President for life!!!

2007-11-29 03:32:58 · 15 answers · asked by Sven T. 1

2007-11-29 03:27:34 · 10 answers · asked by Imperial American 1

I some how doubt but.....

Cons act as though they've never heard of Jeff Gannon--the phony white house report planted by Bush Co. to throw him softball questions. Never-mind the recent fake FEMA press conference or how about the obvious plant during the campaign--remember "Jesus in the White House?" Please, cons crying about getting beat at their own game so typical.

2007-11-29 03:24:39 · 4 answers · asked by Holy Cow! 7

CNN and the Hillary camp are full of it. Keep in mind there was an Obama supporter and two Edwards supporters also asking questions

2007-11-29 03:22:08 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

I have noticed that no matter what the issue is liberals are always complaining about their loss of freedom while lobbying for the government to to use force to implement some economically irresponsible program.

Typically these programs dramatically limit individual freedom of choice.

2007-11-29 03:18:22 · 12 answers · asked by Freedom Guy 4

Many conservative republicans dont like guiliani some say he is a liberal in disguise as a republican however it seems that at this moment being a moderate may be the best way to get votes from the democrats and republicans in the election. Also because hillary is too liberal she might get less than 20% of the electoral votes in the south and guiliani might get the rest if he ran with a conservative like mccain.

2007-11-29 03:17:25 · 16 answers · asked by Scott 1