English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 4 September 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

2007-09-04 23:40:56 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

are unions still releavant and why

2007-09-04 23:22:43 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

I saw this Question about Muslims and terrorist and I jus dont Get it why us always to blame???Why not the People who run this World, who make the Wrong choices for Stupid Phsycopaths like Osama to stand up and blow them selves up in the name of God amd Especially in the Name of Allah (Which stands for god in Arabic).
Well lemme Define Islam as much as I can here ok:-
Islam stands for Submition of ones Will to God so if an arrogant Bastard Blows ones Self up in the name of Islam and Allah than wht would it seem like well it would sem like Allah (God) wants us Muslims to blow you (Non Muslims) up!!! Which is Completely not True I mean Why would God wanna Destroy his Own Creation, i Hope this a l will Prove that Islam is not a Religion of Terror.
When we (Muslims) Meet sombody (anyone Muslim, non muslim) we Greet by saying Salam which Stands for peace and the Complete Phrase is Assalamualikum Which stands for May the Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon you, so why would we wanna ...

2007-09-04 23:18:45 · 27 answers · asked by Linkin Soldier 3

Sweet Jesus, the academic world is a total joke. This is actual proof. It's academic welfare. This study is proof of the OBVIOUS. A number of idiots were paid six-figures to "discover" this. Is it time for university reform? A bunch of snotty pricks in their ivory tower bubble study what people in the real world already know. It's a shame. Why can't they investigate issues that people really want to know? It seems like Fox Entertainment and NBC Dateline do a better job nowadays of investigating issues people want to know about.

Here's the link to this sad story: http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/09/04/dating.mating.ap/index.html

2007-09-04 22:42:04 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

They cheer lustfully for war in Iraq, which had no justification to begin with.

They say it's not about getting Iraq's oil... fine.

They know it's definitely not about getting Bin Laden, he's not in Iraq unless he's as dumb as the Dubya.

So, what part of War Mongerer doesn't describe the Republicans here who say "stay the course, the war is going so well!"?

2007-09-04 22:39:10 · 15 answers · asked by Tweet 3

to be successful without any regional or local support for its operations? Nor any political or diplomatic support?

You know, under International Law, the war in Iraq is illegal. Oddly enough, under US Congress Law, its legal.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6979282.stm

2007-09-04 22:33:20 · 3 answers · asked by Zabanya 6

In how many foreign countries has the USA imposed (or attempted to impose) its government of choice since WW2?

2007-09-04 22:13:12 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you believe that the US would be right to invade Iran? How likely is it that we will within the next year? Would you support it?

Or would you start a revolution to remove Bush from office yourself?

Would it make a difference if there were a terrorist act that gave us pretext for invasion?

2007-09-04 21:51:00 · 38 answers · asked by Anonymous

during his presidency thus far on domestic and foreign policy.

2007-09-04 21:35:13 · 9 answers · asked by 2012 4

courtroom for Sen.Craig's defense? Only way it would seem for him to show off his "wide stance".
Could be pretty humorous - don't you think?(A United States Senator squatting on a john in a court of law)....

2007-09-04 21:04:13 · 7 answers · asked by Your Teeth or Mine? 5

2007-09-04 20:50:07 · 12 answers · asked by l 5

playing Twister in the Halls of Congress be de rigueur?

2007-09-04 20:31:08 · 8 answers · asked by Your Teeth or Mine? 5

To me how the Clinton administration acted during the genocide is way bigger deal than the Monica bull.Even the french were faster.

2007-09-04 20:27:52 · 7 answers · asked by RX 5

I'm coloured by the way I'm not racsist but you have to look at the odds doesn't that say something?

2007-09-04 19:34:45 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Craig issue.... a guy who isn't actually charged with having sex in a bathroom... yet they have no problem with Slick Willy degrading the Oval Office?

If Craig broke an ethics code I think he should resign.... just like any other Political leader. That simple enough?

2007-09-04 18:43:44 · 24 answers · asked by karma 3

It seems that the left wing media has fooled a lot of people.

Hey Libs Do you think its possible to answer this question without getting personal?

2007-09-04 18:40:19 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070905/ap_on_go_co/craig_senate

2007-09-04 18:30:19 · 10 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6

Maybe it's just the media's portrayal of the Evangelical/Fundamentalist sects, but it seems they are always shown to have some issue with a Catholic, Mormon, or Jewish presidential candidate. Is this accurate or is it the media?

I'm a Catholic. If I were running for President I don't think I would be calling the Pope for political advice nor would I be basing my public policy on Catholic Canon Law. Do Evangelicals really believe Mormons, Catholics, Jews, or even Muslims would let their beliefs and religious loyalties cloud their decisions as President? If so, why.

Thanks!

2007-09-04 18:13:51 · 11 answers · asked by Willie D 7

2007-09-04 18:13:03 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

We are at war in Iraq, but also a war has not been declared. My understanding is Congress authorized Bush to use force in Iraq, but did not declare war. Is that what it takes to invade a country and occupy it for years is for Congress to merely vote "permission to use force"? But the thing that really is confusing is ....if congress wants to deauthorize the use of force, Bush can veto a deauthorization?

This seems to not follow logically, How can congress have authority to say "go attack a country", but if they want to say "leave that country alone...we no longer want them attacked", the president can veto the latter?

2007-09-04 18:04:42 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-09-04 18:03:45 · 12 answers · asked by Dancefreak 2

She always has to speak up or speak out for him. He seems very timid. She seems to have a bigger set of walnuts then him. I bet Hitlery would hate that with a passion. What say you.

2007-09-04 17:37:21 · 7 answers · asked by Ozombie 3

Considering how well spoken our President and Miss South Carolina are, perhaps she can find a job in the Bush administration?

Gosh, there's so many to choose from! Personal advisor, press secretary, Attorney General, speechwriter, vocal coach ... the list goes on and on.

What job do YOU think she is best suited for? Answer quick!

2007-09-04 17:36:06 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

...and then pick it apart, connect the dots and through reasoning form a conclusion?

Or do you accept it at face value?

2007-09-04 17:28:42 · 17 answers · asked by Glen B 6

Fox has more viewers than CNN
Longest running PBS show is Firing Line - a conserv. show
Rupert Murdoch owns the second largest media organization in the U.S.
Most listened to radio station in U.S. - Rush Limbaugh
Most listened to radio commentary in the past 50 years - consv. Paul Harvey
largest circulation of a magazine is "TV Guide" - owned by R. Murcoch.
newspaper with the highest circulation - "Wall Street Journal"
ABC, CBS, NBC - all owned by conservative corporations
90% of the daily newspapers over the past 16 years endorsed such Conservatives as Reagan, Reagan, Bush, Bush, Dole and Bush for President.
turn on "a.m. radio" and what do you get - Conservatives such as Bob Grant, Ollie North, Rush Limbaugh, Gordon Liddy, Ken Hamblin, Michael Reagan, Armstrong Williams, Bill O’Reily, Sean Hannity and Laura Schlessinger pushing their Conservative propaganda.

2007-09-04 17:28:35 · 12 answers · asked by truth seeker 7

At a joint press conference with Australian Prime Minister in Sydney earlier today 5 September, 2007, in response to a question from a journalist named Susan, President Bush insisted on her calling him ‘cute’! ‘I am cute and I want you to call me cute!’ Wonder if Laura Bush was around listening to his suggestion!

At the same press conference, looking at the Australian Prime Minister standing next to him, President Bush said ‘I am a beef person’ and added he was looking forward to tasting Australian beef!

2007-09-04 17:23:09 · 15 answers · asked by Sami V 7

Bill Clinton is on and "Everyone" should watch him.

2007-09-04 17:17:04 · 4 answers · asked by Sparkles 7

fedest.com, questions and answers