Sweet Jesus, the academic world is a total joke. This is actual proof. It's academic welfare. This study is proof of the OBVIOUS. A number of idiots were paid six-figures to "discover" this. Is it time for university reform? A bunch of snotty pricks in their ivory tower bubble study what people in the real world already know. It's a shame. Why can't they investigate issues that people really want to know? It seems like Fox Entertainment and NBC Dateline do a better job nowadays of investigating issues people want to know about.
Here's the link to this sad story: http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/09/04/dating.mating.ap/index.html
2007-09-04 22:42:04 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I always thought men were shallow! Wow!
I bet its a man that financed that study and a man that decided it should be published, too.
2007-09-04 22:47:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah and then they wonder why people dont take science seriously when it blames droughts in the summer on global warming... I mean the drought couldnt possibly have been caused because its SUMMER!
Scientists nowadays pretend to act like scientists of half a century ago and yet cant figure out the incredibly OBVIOUS.
Thankfully some people still think.
2007-09-04 23:36:27 · answer #2 · answered by Avatar_defender_of_the_light 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I can't believe it. What a total waste of time. That's one scientific study that is not worth the paper it was printed on. Looks like the theory of evolution is not panning out. Maybe they can come up with a theory as to why human intelligence is regressing to this extent.
2007-09-04 22:57:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shocked shocked I say. That men only want hot chicks and that someone found a way to fund a research project study to that? I am so jealous
2007-09-04 23:01:07 · answer #4 · answered by Bob D 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stop the Presses! People like attractive people? That's news to me.
Also, it says they were looking for "attractive" qualities, not nesseccarily "hot." To me attractive figures in kindness, intelligence, and how a person holds themselves. Hot is generally reserved for looks alone.
2007-09-04 22:50:25 · answer #5 · answered by Jon 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The one eyed in the village of bilnds sees the truth.
2007-09-04 23:03:28 · answer #6 · answered by WO LEE 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It completely relies upon on the guy. each and each guy or woman's popularity is guy or woman to that guy or woman, not something approximately their orientation as an entire. If I have been to fall for a bisexual guy or a bisexual female, it may be because of the fact i assumed they extremely have been captivating, not because of the fact they have been a bisexual guy or a bisexual female.
2016-11-14 06:02:39 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would be nice though to think that there are a few men out there who like intelligent women.
2007-09-05 00:10:22 · answer #8 · answered by ash 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is Science. And they wonder why we don't take them seriously when they have to spend millions to find out what everyone knows.
2007-09-04 22:59:11 · answer #9 · answered by Locutus1of1 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ive been married for well over twenty years and i know what i like. i looked for what the heart told me and worried about the rest later. for me its realism. looks certainly dont hurt but i looked for common traits in what made me and the partner happy. i dont really look at this as...attractiveness, its what makes me stronger with someone as a whole.
2007-09-04 23:02:14 · answer #10 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋