2007-09-04 17:15:18 · 12 answers · asked by in pain 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Not until the work is finished.
2007-09-04 17:18:52 · answer #1 · answered by Jeremiah Johnson 7 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yeah, I would approve, do approve, have always approved. The one stipulation I have is that we don't stop providing our troops with neccesary equipment.
It's naive to think that if we stopped war funding that 100% of the troops would be coming home tomorrow. There will still be a U.S. presence in Iraq (unfortunately, and for how long is anybody's guess), and I don't want them to be sitting ducks.
But yes, I support the notion of discontinued funding for the war in Iraq. We never should have gone there in the 1st place.
2007-09-05 00:23:46 · answer #2 · answered by DiaBoLiKaL 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, because even if that happens our troops would still be in Iraq even before they withdrew. I will not approve of anybody who thinks that our troops should be without the money to be properly supplied and equipped.
2007-09-05 00:29:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No! I want the elected officials to end the war not punish the troops.
You know thats what those jerks would do!
2007-09-05 00:29:02 · answer #4 · answered by whitiepossum 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If it is the only way to force Bush to bring them home before he leaves office...Why should the next president have to clean up his mess?Plus it FORCES the Iraqis to take over thier own security!Plus it brings some troops back to their home bases in case of another national emergency like Katrina!
2007-09-05 00:25:12 · answer #5 · answered by honestamerican 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. It is despicable that Congress voted for the war and now wants to take away their funding for merely political reasons.
2007-09-05 00:21:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
No I would not approve of that. But I will approve if they want to cut spending on sorry social programs. A few come to mind. WIC, & Welfare.
2007-09-05 00:19:43 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes, they should keep funding it, funny how so many voted to go to war, now want to abandon the very ones they sent to fight in the war, to get votes. Makes you wonder who's side they are own.
First things first. It is not the will of the American people. No one has said they want us to leave if it means losing. Everyone wants the troops to come home. The right, and a great deal of this country, want that to be when they win. The left wants it to be in defeat.
The Democrats have deluded themselves into believing that they won the majority because of the war. While the handling of the war had something to do with it, the reason Republicans lost is because they became like Democrats. They were spending money, courting lobbyists and their corruption was the focus of the left (who actually tried to hide its own). Democrats had no plan, they hid what they wanted to do and now that they are in power they are trying to surrender. This will be their undoing.
Differences between Bush & Clinton?
Clinton awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Yugoslavia - good...
Bush awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Iraq - bad...
Clinton spends billion/trillions on war in Serbia - good...
Bush spends billion /trillion in Iraq - bad...
Clinton imposes regime change in Serbia - good...
Bush imposes regime change in Iraq - bad...
Clinton bombs Christian Serbs on behalf of Muslim Albanian terrorists -good...
Bush liberates 25 million from a genocidal dictator - bad...
Clinton bombs Chinese embassy - good...
Bush bombs terrorist camps - bad...
Clinton commits felonies while in office - good...
Bush lands on aircraft carrier in jumpsuit - bad...
Stock market crashes in 2000 under Clinton - good...
Economy on upswing under Bush - bad...
Clinton refuses to take custody of Bin Laden - good...
World Trade Centers fall under Bush - bad...
Clinton says Saddam has nukes - good...
Bush says Saddam has nukes, information from Clinton Administration - bad...
Clinton calls for regime change in Iraq - good...
Bush imposes regime change in Iraq - bad...
Terrorist training in Afghanistan under Clinton - good...
Bush destroys training camps in Afghanistan - bad...
Milosevic not yet convicted - good...
Saddam turned over for trial by his own people - bad...
All it takes is the Media to switch the good one, to the bad one, and people eat it up.
Give our troops what they need to win, not abandon them, just to claim they brought them home, defeated, a terrorist dream. If this happens, terrorist will follow them right back here to our soil.
2007-09-05 00:45:46 · answer #8 · answered by lilly4 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No I wouldn't. I would think of them as someone who put my family, friends, and me in danger.
2007-09-05 00:30:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would be the first intelligent move that they have made in this whole distaster. In a word....YES!
2007-09-05 00:21:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I won't vote for anyone who continues to fund the war. Period.
2007-09-05 00:17:36 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋