English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 1 August 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

Here research this yourself.

http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sfc/pol/383238766.html

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/07/20070717-3.html

Can we let this administration do this?

Call your local state government offices!
Your Congressmen.
Your Senators.
Your Representatives.
Your Governor.
E-mail--mail--whatever!

This is outrageous!!

2007-08-01 17:41:23 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Is that why they freak out when they think somebody might actually be able to see a doctor when they need to?

Is that why so many of the Republicans I know take full advantage of Social Security and Medicare benefits (or have parents who do), but don't want others to have them?

They want the government to spend money on entitlement programs for rich corporations, like us paying 50% of R & D costs for pharma companies, but yet when it comes to making sure all Americans have healthcare, they balk? Come ON man.

What's the deal with that?????

2007-08-01 17:16:18 · 23 answers · asked by Cerulean 3

It could be taken out of your paycheck like your insurance premiums already are.

Once the paperwork is eliminated in the cost of overhead because of all of the different insurance companies the cost to every person would be lower.

And EVERY citizen would be covered!

So if the cost is the same or lower per person already paying for coverage...... and the quality remains or perhaps gets better....what's the problem?

A streamlined system would be more efficient and better for everyone......except maybe the then unnecessary health insurance companies!!

2007-08-01 17:09:36 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

with as many people who come here bickering and whining about how the evil facist tyrant bush ruined our once beautiful country, I cant help but ask myself, how many people actually enjoy living in this "ruined, destroyed, evil, ect." country.

I personaly like it more than ive ever liked it before

2007-08-01 17:08:37 · 10 answers · asked by Adam of the wired 7

2007-08-01 17:06:40 · 3 answers · asked by dingoboy 1

George Orwell couldn't have put it any better.

2007-08-01 17:05:53 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Explain, don't whine or be a bigot.

2007-08-01 16:59:10 · 22 answers · asked by Appono Astos 5

The war in Iraq has nothing to do with our freedoms.
Saddam and Iraq had no ties to Al Qaeda, no connection to 9/11, had no WMD, and posed no threat to the USA.

So why should Repuglicans like Mitt Romney get away with saying the soldiers who are sacrificing their lives for Bush's lie-based quagmire are "defending our freedoms"?

2007-08-01 16:52:10 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Give more of THEIR money in taxes
1) Invite the "indigent" to live with them
2) Pay health insurance premiums for those who "can't" afford it
3) Buy extra groceries to feed the hungry
4) Start a company and employee the unskilled, unmotivated, uneducated, unemployeed at excessively high wages

In other world, put your own stinking money where your mouth is if you believe in it so much

2007-08-01 16:48:21 · 18 answers · asked by Libsuc 3

Closed minded - when anyone disagrees with a liberal.
Compromise - when you do what a liberal wants.
Freedom - when liberals get their way.
Unbiased - when it leans left.

2007-08-01 16:44:36 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

We go into Iraq on March 2003 on the premise that Saddam's regime is supporting Al-Qaeda and that he possesses WMDs, despite 2001 and 2002 reports from the Bush administration that only Afghanistan is a necessary target. Well I guess the fact that Saddam's attempt to kill Bush's daddy prompted him to conjure up a pot of boiling bs so he could finish the job in Iraq. Congress voted hands in, but I'm sure not one truly looked into the reports, and only 1 congressman had a child in the military so no loss right, well not for the boys on the hill at least. Funny thing is 15 of the hijackers were Saudi, 7% of the American economy is set on Arabian investments, and on September 13 Bush allowed over 100 Saudis, some of the bin Laden family, board private jets back to Saudi Arabia without a single interrogation. Why doesn't Bush grow balls, pull his hand out the Arabian wallet, and force the Saudi family to cut down on their own terrorist problems? So why are we in Iraq again?

2007-08-01 16:41:03 · 5 answers · asked by hobbitgonewild 3

or....all bridges?

2007-08-01 16:39:07 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-01 16:34:07 · 6 answers · asked by Jeremy P 2

If so, please state your former party.

2007-08-01 16:24:33 · 14 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

because they want to fell better about themselves?

2007-08-01 16:11:50 · 8 answers · asked by Jeremy P 2

Don't you think? SMOKING! Too bad he is in jail :(

2007-08-01 16:07:48 · 7 answers · asked by Christie G 1

From: john_r_and_brush

Subject: Re: is that supposed to be your idea of a "threat"? LOL
Message: "feel threatened"? LMAO By you?!!! The ONLY way you could present a "threat" to me is if I laughed too hard at the ignorance you post and choked on a pretzel!
I've BEEN a Federal Law Enforcement Officer since 1998, NOTHING you squawk at me can change this FACT and it cracks me up watching you yellowbellies get your panties all wadded up because I serve while all you do is flap your gums!
I don't need to "disrespect" you, you do that to yourself when you go online jabbering about how much you "support" a war that you will NEVER have the courage to put your life on the line and go FIGHT in!
"If you act the way you do on YA in your day-to-day life, you best watch your back, cause someone’s going to get you. "
I talk to people for real just like I talk to them here. Know what happened the last time I ran into some loudmouth like you? he spent 30 minutes TALKING about how he

2007-08-01 16:04:57 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

What does Fred have going for him other than his trophy wife and an acting career. I thought he left politics for Hollywood. Did Reagan not teach anyone a lesson?

2007-08-01 16:04:39 · 13 answers · asked by lucera 2

If it is, why does the new joints chief of staff say that no amount of US troops or surges, can win the war in Iraq. He said that it has to be a politial solution & with the Iraqi Sunnis resigning from the Iraq Govt. there will never be a political solution. Get it?!?! Just more & more of a civil war that the US military can't win.

2007-08-01 16:02:01 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-08-01 15:58:50 · 8 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/saudi/analyses/wahhabism.html

Saudi Arabia is the epicenter of RADICAL ISLAM.

2007-08-01 15:52:35 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://kentroversypapers.blogspot.com/2006/01/its-just-game-its-just-game.html

2007-08-01 15:51:06 · 11 answers · asked by Enigma 6

Me and my friend are arguing about it he says yes, i say no. Who's right?

2007-08-01 15:49:06 · 24 answers · asked by Michael J 1

fedest.com, questions and answers