Damn, if I was Leno, I would use that joke in my monologue
That was pretty creative, man!
2007-08-01 16:42:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by phjun8383 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Bush will claim the Bridge was in Iran (or a similar Oil rich Country) and Move the National Guard in (with Marine, Army, and Navy, and Air Support).
FEMA will Arrive on the Scene within the Decade to Render Immediate Assistance.
Cheney will shoot Someone at Random.
We will have to remove Bridges from your Person or Baggage when entering the Airport.
Congress will Put off for Study....ummm...whatever it is...for More Important Issues on the Table.
Hillary will dress even more (I want to use a word for a dam in Holland, but I'll get in Trouble)-ish.
Bill will get a....well we All know what
Jeb Bush will call the bridge a Hanging Chad.
Prof. Hawking will show the Bridge both Did and Did Not Exist at the Momment it Fell.
Queen Elizabeth will Still Not Give-up the Throne.
And a Small Pot of Flowers will go "Oh No, not Again"
2007-08-01 16:51:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by wonderland.alyson 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well seeing as he declared war on Iraq, it's possible he could declare war on bridges and gravity. But on the other side, he didn't declare war on mother nature when Hurricane Katrina hit the southern United States.
2007-08-01 16:42:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by yourguardianangel_fell_facedown 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Which Bush and which Iraq conflict? the present President, George W. Bush, drove the invasion of Iraq that's stated as the "conflict in Iraq" at latest. although, his father, George H.W. Bush, drove the invasion of Iraq stated as the "Gulf conflict" around 10 years or so in the previous. Technically a President in no way publicizes conflict. that's particularly accomplished by using the Senate in step with the U.S. shape. although, very in lots of cases the Senate sidesteps this and easily passes a "decision" helping the conflict. For the present Iraq conflict the call grew to become into exceeded October eleventh, 2002 as seen in the tale at hyperlink under: long in the previous that however George W. grew to become into pushing the U.S. Congress and our Allies (besides because of the fact the U.N.) to attempt to generate help for the conflict. He grew to become into helpful in captivating the U.ok., Italy, Spain and quite a few different eastern ecu countries to connect us yet better allies maximum pretty France and Germany have been adversarial to the conflict. Spain later withdrew particularly as a effect of a metamorphosis in government that exceeded off after a considerable al Qaeda attack in Spain in basic terms in the previous elections.
2016-10-09 00:50:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If Bush was not spending our children's money in Iraq, we would have the means to fix all the bridges in the country.
2007-08-03 03:53:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ted the brewer 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why? Gravity is his ally, without it how would all those millions of tons of bombs have pounded the hell out of Iraq and Afghanistan? But what the hell, he's not much of a common sense type of guys and besides he's got missiles
2007-08-01 16:42:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by hobbitgonewild 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I am surprised all of you Bush haters haven't blamed him for the bridge's collapse.
Oops, spoke too soon. . .
2007-08-01 16:42:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
So gravity is the axis of evil. Stoopid stoopid physics
2007-08-01 16:43:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Oq 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
already covered that one slick, bush blew it up to start an illegal war with canada so we can get beer.
no war for beer
no war for beer
waint a minute what the hell am i saying
2007-08-01 16:41:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Adam of the wired 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
If Mrs. Bush has not declared war on Mr. Bush's face then what chance do we have?
2007-08-01 16:41:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Okay, that was funny
A nation that can't laugh at itself, even in a tragic situation like this won't be able to survive
2007-08-01 16:47:58
·
answer #11
·
answered by Karce 4
·
0⤊
0⤋