Politics - 3 November 2006

2006-11-03 16:35:32 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-03 16:22:28 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-03 16:13:03 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Total of 300 murders and bodies found today

2006-11-03 16:10:19 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Vanity Fair Exclusive ---: Now They Tell Us
November 3, 2006
Neo Culpa
As Iraq slips further into chaos, the war's neoconservative boosters have turned sharply on the Bush administration, charging that their grand designs have been undermined by White House incompetence. In a series of exclusive interviews, Richard Perle, Kenneth Adelman, David Frum, and others play the blame game with shocking frankness. Target No. 1: the president himself.

So now tne neoconservatives blame the president. Oops. But didn't they encourage him to take down Saddam and occupy Iraq?
didn't they see Iraq as a good candidate for democratic reform?
So now they want to lay it on the president. Typical. Except perhaps next time, we will embrace the democratic process OURSELVES, and be sure we pick a new president who can THINK FOR HIMSELF !

2006-11-03 16:06:59 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

In Sanfrancisco, and they are voting a straight lucky ticket

2006-11-03 16:05:49 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Given the situations going on right now...and specualtions for the future...
Do you think there will be a draft reinstated at any point in the future? what will be the different ways to avoid it...will it be harder to avoid than the last time a draft was issued?

2006-11-03 15:58:47 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

TED HAGGARD..

2006-11-03 15:58:05 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-03 15:54:27 · 5 answers · asked by Beka K 2

This president must apologize to the troops for having suggested, six weeks ago, that the chaos in Iraq, the death and the carnage, the slaughtered Iraqi civilians and the dead American service personnel, will, to history, “look like just a comma.”

This president must apologize to the troops because the intelligence he claims led us into Iraq proved to be undeniably and irredeemably wrong.

This president must apologize to the troops for having laughed about the failure of that intelligence at a banquet while our troops were in harm’s way.


This president must apologize to the troops because the streets of Iraq were not strewn with flowers and its residents did not greet them as liberators.

This president must apologize to the troops because his administration ran out of “plan” after barely two months.

This president must apologize to the troops for getting 2,815 of them killed.

This president must apologize to the troops for getting this country into a war without a clue.

And Mr. Bush owes us an apology for this destructive and omnivorous presidency.

We will not receive them, of course.

This president never apologizes.

Not to the troops.

Not to the people.

Nor will those henchmen who have echoed him.

2006-11-03 15:49:12 · 16 answers · asked by dstr 6

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Bush

2006-11-03 15:44:28 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

or the DNC?

Perhaps they are one in the same?

2006-11-03 15:42:14 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-03 15:35:48 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

that all of william jefferson's money made it through the hurricane?
the money he took in a bribe. How did that happen?

2006-11-03 15:28:48 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

libs are still blaming him for the "mass destruction" of the last big one.

2006-11-03 15:21:51 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

Cap'n Crunch is running with the independent ticket with a running mate of Tucan Sam. Now who will you vote for?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Aq4JVbO4gpQzLnEWodBmqz3sy6IX?qid=20061103200251AA3nf7m

2006-11-03 15:20:10 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

This is a serious question. I would've thought before the past few months that spotting a gay republican was like spotting big foot. It seems now that they may be quite numerous. Am I wrong about this?

2006-11-03 15:18:49 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

DIEBOLD

2006-11-03 15:09:18 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

with a running mate of Wendell, and running against Lucky and the Ghostbusters, who would you vote for?

2006-11-03 15:02:51 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Now instead of calling me names go check it out then ansewer my question, who's better at Security?

2006-11-03 14:47:45 · 10 answers · asked by older_fat_male 3

2006-11-03 14:42:45 · 24 answers · asked by HELLBENT 2

Who would win in a political debate, Lucky http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ApvMHFmxbOgC8ZSY5X9RLJ7zy6IX?qid=20061103192131AAcBPbh
or
Wendell
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Aq.C7HXSahRsAPaTmarbbu_sy6IX?qid=20061103192036AAmEZMP

And who would you vote for?

2006-11-03 14:37:30 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

ao aiel oierj opzo ie okeja o kdo loeoa ??kao didkw oskd oskdj dickweed!!

2006-11-03 14:34:14 · 5 answers · asked by assmouth p 3

does anyone out there sence the comming storm when ALL the countries that hate us(south and central america) try to militarily invade us.along with n.korea,china,russia,UAE,..do you fee the stage is set for the REAL WW3?.if so ,please explain what you think might happen,do you think the USA can prevail,and who will stand with us.do you also think that the middle eastern islamic countries will come after israel when the come after us?

2006-11-03 14:29:41 · 10 answers · asked by bluesharpman_642000 3

It seems against the wishes of the CIA and a host of other intelligence experts that told the Bush Adminastration that it was too dangerous and that the information they wanted to post on the web could give terrorists or rogue nations what they needed to build a nuclear bomb Bush Co. forced the posting of Nuke secrets onto the internet saying that by putting the info (taken from Iraq) onto the net and maybe the public could see it and maybe help them find the WMDs that aren't there. So whose better on security???? Forced to finally pull the info off the web thanks to some patriotic reporters who were appalled at the stupidity of such classifed info being on the net they got it pulled down yesterday the damage is done. these guys are priceless,huh?

2006-11-03 14:28:53 · 17 answers · asked by older_fat_male 3

Some people do, some don't. In my OPINION I think we could have done better, I'm not saying hes a bad president but Maybe one of you guys could change or help me make up my mind!

2006-11-03 14:26:43 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-11-03 14:25:28 · 17 answers · asked by Opeal 1

president? What platform would he run under? What party?

2006-11-03 14:21:31 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

how funny is that?

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/290653_diebold01.html

2006-11-03 14:21:26 · 7 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1

Someone recently said that Democrats have become the party of both liberals *and* conservatives. Maybe that's because they're not interested in foreign entanglements, large deficits, reduction of civil rights & reduction of personal privacy. It seems that Republicans are conservatives in name only.

Republicans today will give lip service to conservative issues, but a lot of those issues end up as un-funded mandates. What's happened to the Republicans that's caused them to abandon traditional conservatism for neo-conservative values and agenda? Do you think there's any real chance that Republicans will be real conservatives again, or do you think they've permanently become the party of the neo-cons?

2006-11-03 14:21:24 · 6 answers · asked by Good Times, Happy Times... 4