So the Reugnantcan'ts are so great on Security huh? then why did bush order nuke secrets posted on the web?

Question

It seems against the wishes of the CIA and a host of other intelligence experts that told the Bush Adminastration that it was too dangerous and that the information they wanted to post on the web could give terrorists or rogue nations what they needed to build a nuclear bomb Bush Co. forced the posting of Nuke secrets onto the internet saying that by putting the info (taken from Iraq) onto the net and maybe the public could see it and maybe help them find the WMDs that aren't there. So whose better on security???? Forced to finally pull the info off the web thanks to some patriotic reporters who were appalled at the stupidity of such classifed info being on the net they got it pulled down yesterday the damage is done. these guys are priceless,huh?

Answer 1

Sources: Chris Matthews, Joe Scarborough, Keith Obermann, Jerry Springer. This came out today and I also heard that the UN was p'ssed off at USA also for having this crap on the "internets" At the insistence of bush and Hoekstra and some other congressman on the hill Negroponte was forced to set up the procedure to get this stuff put out there for all of us and any interested terrorist to see and study up on. Thank God bush isn't all that good using "the Google" or what else would he compromise in our "best interests". The New York Times should be commended for getting this issue out into the open.

Answer 2

i like how people quickly attempt to discredit the factors. Hardball went after Clinton for years. besides, this appears like a joke, in spite of the indisputable fact that it incredibly occurred. I googled nuke secrets and techniques and hit information. There are distinctive factors and that's a actuality. Unreal.

Answer 3

There has been enough info on the web (& before that in any decent library) for people to learn how to make nukes. What was posted that was new?
I haven't heard anything about this, which is strange considering that most of the press hates Bush & would splatter it all over the place if it were true.
If you have evidence to back up your charge, post it, If not, stop your libel.

Answer 4

Yea
And your too stupid to realise that a lot of the info on that site proves that Saddam had wmd's as late as 2001, Very little of what is on there is info that Iran didnt already have or couldnt get from any one of your commie friends.
Ya cant pick and choose your facts on this one ********, your not the only one that can read, just the only one that wont read the whole thing.

Answer 5

Once again a lib who has to resort to deception, the nuclear reports were put on the web so you libs could see that Saddam was still trying to produce nuclear weapons and as for the WMD's they were in Iraq if you don't think so try sticking your liberal head into a canister of Mustard Gas.

Answer 6

Whoa slow down on the Kool Aide

Answer 7

Bush was too busy protecting his meth using gay prostitute using religious chief, and the man who protected a pedophile (the one who disappeared 1000 children in florida) and the sexual harasser, and the mistress beater.

Did you see all of the extras crowded around him with signs for photo ops. It's 1984! VOTE and check on your vote later just to bust their chops because you know they're gonna steal it! Call the Board of Elections and put them on notice!

Answer 8

For the uninformed among you, the article was in the New York Times.

Answer 9

Do you believe the nukes From USSR have not all been found? Does that mean they don't exist either? Stop gambling with my life.

Answer 10

Still Republicans.