English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 21 October 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

What does the future have for the rest of them who still to be soon uncover?
And is this God revenge for what they have done on Bill Clinton?

2006-10-21 23:54:56 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

why do people need to learn history?

2006-10-21 23:51:55 · 8 answers · asked by JAMES 4

open a crackerjack box and behold the the next nightmare,good gosh ill chose to get someone who would act before the fat lady sings,mad hatters,republicans get the job don right,am i wrong?

2006-10-21 23:41:56 · 11 answers · asked by CIVILIAN 4

Leaving religion, family, the pet dog, etc. out of the question, which comes first, your loyalty to party (Democrat or Republican) or America's good as a whole?

2006-10-21 21:59:43 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2 me seeing all these ppl with degree's makes me think,y is it special if alot of ppl have it as well?

2006-10-21 21:50:27 · 8 answers · asked by Compton,CA 4

Have a thought? Please tell us about it. Some want understand.

2006-10-21 21:44:24 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do really what happen to world after atomic iran? Is it impress war on Iraq? Israel?
What is the best solution to this problem (I think this is a problem)?
What you think about N. Korea behaves?

2006-10-21 21:15:32 · 11 answers · asked by Nitron 1

Please tell us about it.

2006-10-21 21:02:16 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

A recent study cited by the Washington Post said that 600,000 Iraqis have died early due to the U.S. invasion--some from violent death, and more due to the indirect effects. Yet few Americans I've met feel at all responsible, even though the U.S. invaded without having been attacked by Iraq. Why?

2006-10-21 20:39:47 · 26 answers · asked by daniel l 1

Please, tell us about it. Thank you!

2006-10-21 20:38:50 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-21 20:26:56 · 12 answers · asked by daniel l 1

Bush used the phrase Weapons of Mass Destruction so that just about any chemical or biological weapon would qualify as a fair excuse for going to war, regardless of whether they were a real threat to the U.S. Since Saddam's crummy military could never have threatened the U.S., what was the real reason, and should Bush be waterboarded so that we can find out?

2006-10-21 20:24:32 · 8 answers · asked by daniel l 1

unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. -Declaration of Indipendance

2006-10-21 20:14:50 · 9 answers · asked by Timothy C 5

Example illustrating my question: If you are a evangelical warrior, would you consider marrying an agnostic peace-nik? And if you are an agnostic peace-nik, would you consider marrying an evangelical warrior?

2006-10-21 20:02:24 · 10 answers · asked by daniel l 1

I would like to know your best guess as to what percentage of Yahoo Answerers are Dems and what percentage are Republicans. I also what to know what YOU consider yourself to be.

2006-10-21 19:59:05 · 12 answers · asked by daniel l 1

2006-10-21 19:24:41 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

ya know?

2006-10-21 19:14:02 · 13 answers · asked by mike J 1

2006-10-21 19:10:00 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

From Yahoo News -

In an interview with Al-Jazeera television aired late Saturday, Alberto Fernandez, director of public diplomacy in the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs at the State Department offered an unusually candid assessment of America's war in Iraq.

"We tried to do our best but I think there is much room for criticism because, undoubtedly, there was arrogance and there was stupidity from the United States in Iraq," he said.

So how are Americans supposed to take this? Should we be glad that we're admitting our mistakes? Appalled that we're admitting weakness in the face of the enemy? Angry that Bush's stupidity and arrogance cost so many lives?

How do YOU feel about this statement?

2006-10-21 19:04:05 · 8 answers · asked by Chredon 5

2006-10-21 18:50:31 · 11 answers · asked by Hardik 1

In your own opinion of course...

2006-10-21 18:39:06 · 6 answers · asked by Angel of Man 4

I just don't understand why we are so involved in hating and demonizing people who believe differently than we do. Help me out with this one.

2006-10-21 18:10:53 · 12 answers · asked by micah's mom 2

2006-10-21 18:03:35 · 25 answers · asked by mays 1

to which Georgie replied " My dad knows that he can never be as good as me in foreign policy". What do you think.

2006-10-21 18:02:00 · 13 answers · asked by observer 4

i heard u get to go to a wonderful place where u have fun and eat cake all day

2006-10-21 17:50:51 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

For starters, I am firmly against Bush, but it seems that most point the finger at him for all the increased violence. There has to be more to it than merely pointing a finger at one person or one entity?

I am being serious, by the way........LOL

What do you think?

2006-10-21 17:34:39 · 7 answers · asked by Enlightenme! 2

fedest.com, questions and answers