For starters, I am firmly against Bush, but it seems that most point the finger at him for all the increased violence. There has to be more to it than merely pointing a finger at one person or one entity?
I am being serious, by the way........LOL
What do you think?
2006-10-21 17:34:39 · 7 answers · asked by Enlightenme! 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They have been violent for decades! WE WERE BOMBED ON OUR OWN SOIL............doesn't that matter? They are killing in many countries. They are Full of hate and their Quaran tells them to kill anyone thats not of their same belief.
President Bush is trying to protect us! He doesn't want war and he doesn't want it in our country! Look at the millions in Africa that have been slaughtered by Muslims. The people there have very little defense and they know they can take over these poor people.........they rape and kill and leave children ...........they threaten the kids to either be with them and kill also or they will be killed.
Are you a good American or not............do you love this country? How blessed we are to be born here! Don't believe everything you hear on the slanted news.
2006-10-21 17:42:58 · answer #1 · answered by 4263 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
How can you blame one man for all the violence? The war with Islam has been going on for over 200 years with the US, remember "Barbary Pirates" during George Washington's Presidency. Plus, ever since man was, man has been violent, surely President Bush is not to blame for millions killed by islamofacists from the1300's until today? The real question is, Is the Bush Administration doing what it can to eliminate violence against the US from the islamic world?
2006-10-21 17:52:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
that is been a violent place for an somewhat long term. I guess maximum folk do no longer understand the 1st time we fought there exchange into below the Jefferson administration. issues incredibly whilst downhill interior the 70s whilst Carter and his be superb coverage enable Iran get out of control. It calmed down some with Regan by way of fact he exchange right into a stable chief. however the chilly conflict exchange right into a important distraction or maybe then no longer lots exchange into incredibly executed. assaults surpassed off all interior the path of the 90s and not something exchange into carried out to stop it. via the time Bush have been given issues it exchange into so out of hand already that it incredibly is amazing. He did no longer even have time to truly get a cope with on the area, no longer to show have time to do something important approximately it whilst 9-11 surpassed off. So, he has made some blunders. however the area exchange into already screwed up. And in simple terms sitting returned and being superb can no longer stop that. It in simple terms makes us look susceptible and promises the effect that they might win. Iraq might probable be over if we had long previous in incredibly perplexing and not apprehensive approximately hearts and minds as much as appreciate. It additionally might probable be over if there wasn't lots noise approximately leaving, considering that noise provides them wish.
2016-10-15 07:09:49 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, there is enough blame, to pass around. The Islamic world invented violence........
2006-10-21 17:38:07 · answer #4 · answered by avery 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think Gore invented the arabs and Violence
2006-10-21 17:39:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
blame Soros or Foley
2006-10-21 17:47:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
cant blame bush, things were screwy before he got there, he hasnt help ease it any but ya really cant pin it on him.
2006-10-21 17:38:50 · answer #7 · answered by Chris 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋