open a crackerjack box and behold the the next nightmare,good gosh ill chose to get someone who would act before the fat lady sings,mad hatters,republicans get the job don right,am i wrong?
2006-10-21 23:41:56 · 11 answers · asked by CIVILIAN 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No. She supported / supports the war in Iraq. She supports the Patriot Act and she voted for the Military Commissions Act.
I would never vote for her. No principles I aggre with.
2006-10-22 00:10:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Was Bush seriously your hope for the future?
I'm sorry, but ANYBODY could do a better job at the presidency than President Bush. I'd do it, but I haven't filled all the Constitutional requirements yet.
Forget Iraq for a moment, Bush has NEGLECTED the U.S.. You know, the country he was elected to lead. I guess he didn't protect the Constitution to the best of his ability, because I'm pretty sure he's violated a few parts.
President Bush played resistance leader in Iraq, but didn't hep the U.S. The next president will inherit the problems with education, healthcare, social security, and the economy (stock market's good, but the stock market doesn't reflect the ENTIRE economy.) While it's true that every president inherits these problems, they are all worse off now than when Bush took power in 2000.
So, yes, Hillary Rodham Clinton may just be the hope for this country. Or maybe it'll be Bill Richardson. Or John Edwards. Or Barack Obama, somewhere down the road. The Republicans road doesn't lead to the White House in 2008.
2006-10-22 07:03:31 · answer #2 · answered by amg503 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
OK, you questions seems straightforward enough, but what is all that other stuff about crackjack boxes and opera? I will just pretend you actual asked a question to get an answer, although it seems like might be trying to make a political statement of some sort.
She is trying too hard to position herself for her run that I can't get a good sense of how good a leader she would be for our country. As a Democrat, I have pretty high expectations, I don't just want to have a President that does a good job watching over the country, I want a President that leads the country to tackle big challenges like global warming, the retirement of the baby boom, health care shortages, economic inequity, and racism.
I am tired of voting for people that think symbolic issues like burning flag burning is a real issue for America. (Clinton supports banning it as part of her platform). I want someone that is going to ensure my mother can retire before she hits 75 years old. So right now, I am waiting to see if someone real shows up in our party for 2008.
2006-10-22 06:57:01 · answer #3 · answered by SFDHSBudget 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well as an English woman, i would prefer Hilary Clinton than Bush any day.
2006-10-22 06:43:37 · answer #4 · answered by english_rose10 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Only one good thing to say about Hillary:
She stands by her man, Bush.
She supports Bush in Irag.
Only decent thing about the "woman".
2006-10-22 07:20:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
AS long as she comes with the baggage of her husband, she will not be the chosen one for the Dems. Check into to her history in the senate for reasons not to let her be a president. the president needs to be a leader, and she lacks those qualities.
2006-10-22 06:53:50 · answer #6 · answered by meathead 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You are way wrong. Hillary may not be the hope of the future, but with the republican party around, the future looks pretty bleek.
2006-10-22 06:52:34 · answer #7 · answered by jack jr 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I believe that Hillary Clinton is one who is genuinely working toward the hope of our future already.
2006-10-22 06:45:56 · answer #8 · answered by Cub6265 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. Barack Obama
2006-10-22 07:17:31 · answer #9 · answered by Fitforlife 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Defeat communism a second time "DON'T VOTE FOR HILLARY" !
2006-10-22 06:50:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋