English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Bush used the phrase Weapons of Mass Destruction so that just about any chemical or biological weapon would qualify as a fair excuse for going to war, regardless of whether they were a real threat to the U.S. Since Saddam's crummy military could never have threatened the U.S., what was the real reason, and should Bush be waterboarded so that we can find out?

2006-10-21 20:24:32 · 8 answers · asked by daniel l 1 in Politics & Government Politics

8 answers

Why we went to Iraq id irrelevant out of the mouth of a proven liar . Whatever he says I would not turst or know it would change a week later.

This President and all his advisors failed to predict or pre-calculate the consequences of their war actions. They should have been able to predetermine the outcome, Instead he was flying onto ships in Jets declaring victory. Now with the deaths of 600,000 civilian , 3000 plus US soldiers and some 40,000 Iraq are happily enjoying freedom and democracy, while more die and COnservatives stick their heads deeper into the ground.

Waterboarded for an explanation = waste of time.

Impeached without HABEAS CORPUS - YES YES YES

2006-10-21 21:00:37 · answer #1 · answered by meldorhan 4 · 0 1

You know as I have gotten older I have learned that there are just some things in life that are outside all of our control. Ask yourself is it worth going through all trouble? Is it really going to change anything if you find out the reason? All you will have is an answer, and that just isn't enough. Better to just let it go, and figure out how to get our troops out of Iraq. Bush's days of being president are almost over anyway. Then it will be someone else's turn to either pick up his mess, or add to all **** he has created.

2006-10-22 03:32:47 · answer #2 · answered by foxy 3 · 0 1

I'm going with the New World Order as mentioned above. I used to think people who believed in huge conspiracies were nuts, but I'm beginning to think I was just naive.

2006-10-22 03:49:17 · answer #3 · answered by Someday Soon 2 · 0 1

You are sadly uninformed. You also ought to use some caution in what you put forth. Do not insult or threaten the president of the United States. You may state your opinion of Pres. Bush anytime, but do NOT threaten him in anyway. I am appalled at the total lack of manners and respect shown by you.

2006-10-22 03:28:09 · answer #4 · answered by Answergirl 5 · 0 4

haha, first of all of course threatening anyone is wrong, but insulting is our duty, and god its easy with this clown in office. Also he wasnt even elected so, wtf. Do u want to know the REAL reason..most cant handle it. Learn about the new world order, and maybe you'll start to understand. peace

2006-10-22 03:31:47 · answer #5 · answered by David . 2 · 1 1

wish it were so simple have u seen http://www.911review.org/Wiki/StanleyHiltonComplaint.shtml
or
http://www.911review.org/Wiki/StanleyHiltonLawsuit.shtml

2006-10-22 04:02:47 · answer #6 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 0 1

Waterboard with a side order of rendition please.

2006-10-22 03:33:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

yeah............OIL

2006-10-22 03:30:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers