English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Politics - 30 September 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Politics

2006-09-30 13:21:55 · 10 answers · asked by thearentIcoolguy 1

Chavez says he will stop the oil supply to the USA if we attack Iran. This constitutes 15% of all US oil imports. Will we be able to survive this? or is the option to attack Venezuela now on the cards?

2006-09-30 13:19:47 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

But that's not the reason some of them are antiImmigrants, is it?

Shalom and Peace. Feed the Poor and Tax the Rich

2006-09-30 13:17:28 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

It has been proved by Bombay police that the terrorist bombs which killed 750 innocent people in Bombay was engineered by the ISI of pakistan. Naturally Pakistaan has denied its involvement as usual and the next step is George Bush to come out inSupport of Pakistan as usual. INDIA HAS BEEN A PERMANENT VICTIM OF PAKISTAN ENGINEERED TERRORISM FOR MORE THAN 3 DECADES. It has been doing so on the strength of US support.
So if those who support terrorism are also terrorists, George Bush has qualified for the title is it not?

2006-09-30 13:17:04 · 14 answers · asked by Brahmanda 7

Namely, radical Muslims killing innocent Americans and Jews. Really, let's be serious, but mostly logical. And don't say that they kill themseleves for a good cause. If 1 (one) Israeli were to blow himself up to kill other Muslims, the general world would go nuts against Israel.

2006-09-30 13:17:04 · 5 answers · asked by Jake B 2

...can't we just assume he'd give the finger to politicians in general?

2006-09-30 13:13:04 · 10 answers · asked by Tofu Jesus 5

2006-09-30 13:09:40 · 17 answers · asked by baybean 2

I wonder why, think they know something we dont?

2006-09-30 13:08:09 · 7 answers · asked by Enterrador 4

2006-09-30 13:06:13 · 16 answers · asked by locksniffer 3

I can understand the logic behind building the fence. It certainly will drastically reduce the influx of illegal immigrants, drug trafficking and prostitution trafficking.

But why did the Senate vote down the Guest Worker Program? I’ve always thought this was one of Bush’s better, more practical concepts. Let them come in as registered ‘guest’ workers, let them work and collect legal taxes on the work they provide.

Can anyone here provide a viable reason why this provision was excluded from the just passed Senate bill?

2006-09-30 12:52:52 · 10 answers · asked by Doc Watson 7

article this morning in SF chronicle....both are delcaring the ag business a disaster because crops are rotting on the fields. seems the heat against illegals is reducing the workforce to pick produce. CA senators are claiming, if something isnt done CA loses its farms....oh really?...anyone really think all CA farms will shut down if we dont allow illegals into the country?.....more like, boxer & feinstein do not want to take the heat when the price of produce goes up as a result of submitting to illegals and the latino community.
i will gladly pay a lot more for produce and landscaping...and everything else, if it goes into the pockets of americans,,,not sent to mexico.

here's the message to you both-either start addressing the needs of americans, and not illegals,,,or you will be gone.

anyone disagree?

2006-09-30 12:51:29 · 5 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1

MANY MANY congressmen vote with their party regardless of what they believe. There is much pressure put on them to do so from BOTH parties.
Would YOU be strong enough to vote the way YOU feel?
I would like to THINK I could do it...

2006-09-30 12:43:38 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

warrior......one kick to the balls and that crotchety old prune folds up like a cheap piece of patio furniture

2006-09-30 12:41:03 · 11 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1

http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/terror_laws_bush_given_authority_sexually_torture_us_kids.htm


REPUBLICANS HAVE BEEN ESPOSED AS CHILD MOLLESTORS AND ANTI FREEDOM FIGHTERS

REPUBLICANS HATE THE VERY FREEDOM OUR LIBERAL FOREFATHERS FOUGHT AND DIED FOR SO THAT WE COULD BE FREE..

But now................. Republicans want to mollest and turture our children?

Liberals will prosecute and imprison all republicans responsible for this. Come november republicans will be a myth. a bad nightmare

2006-09-30 12:40:17 · 20 answers · asked by ast5792 1

I tell you what protesters if you come to any funerals were I live and protest these warriors funerals you will get the crap kicked out of you. You are communist bastards and should be put to death.

2006-09-30 12:30:35 · 15 answers · asked by Blinken 1

http://www.worldcantwait.net

2006-09-30 12:27:21 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Listen quit being scared to speak your mind. If you dont agree with certain people just say it. Dont suck up to them or there cause. Everybody is scared of offending people like gays,muslims,liberals and other organizations like the stupid ACLU. Be proud in what you believe and stand for it.

2006-09-30 12:25:20 · 16 answers · asked by Blinken 1

Now with foley and many republicans mollesting and supporting the mollestation of young children, I feel republicans should be screened and put under a lie detector test. We need to save and protect our children and family.

Foley was supposed to protect children NOT try to mollest young boys.

WANT TO KNOW THE FUNNY PART? NOT ONE REPUBLICAN HAS DENOUNCED FOLEY FOR HIS CRIMINAL ACTS! NOT ONE!

2006-09-30 12:19:55 · 12 answers · asked by ast5792 1

another republican got nailed and resigned to get away quick after getting caught propositioning pages and other underage boys -his name is mark foley -just on the news. and of all things he was all about signing bills into law to do no other than protect underage youth from online predators. has everyone had enough?.

2006-09-30 12:16:30 · 15 answers · asked by inquisitive 4

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060930/ap_on_go_co/foley_reynolds
I'm just curious.

2006-09-30 12:01:25 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

for example oil: do you think one man can can control world wide supply and demand. He must call one of his buds up and say lets set the price at 75$ a barrel today. is that how it works or am i wrong

2006-09-30 11:50:58 · 42 answers · asked by leterbuck 1

How can we get more people involved?

2006-09-30 11:41:14 · 22 answers · asked by nlc_in_cali 2

Can you name anyone that you see on BBC television who you might think would vote conservative.

2006-09-30 11:38:17 · 7 answers · asked by BENVEE 3

clearly all the men and boys in these hell holes sren't guilty.. of anything other than being dark skinned ? So what gives? IS one an excuse for the other and when does the good guy become the bad guy ?

what happened to two wrongs don't make a right ?

2006-09-30 11:38:14 · 8 answers · asked by hardartsystems 3

2006-09-30 11:33:00 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous

Let's face it, the U.N is corrupt.

Most of the people there are anti-american, anti-semetic, and pro-islam, they believe talking to the islamic leaders will resolve the problems. Kind of what they are trying to do with Iran, and guess what, Iran doesnt give a damn.

If there isnt a U.N, many countries would be IN Iran trying to stop their Uranium enrichment. They would halt supplies leaving and entering, but what does the U.N do when they threaten to sanction. They let them go.

No U.N = faster problem solving.
That simple.

2006-09-30 11:32:26 · 3 answers · asked by julean33 2

But now it's ok?

2006-09-30 11:23:27 · 18 answers · asked by Aurred 2

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-elliott/how-mark-foley-represents_b_30639.html

2006-09-30 11:21:55 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

fedest.com, questions and answers