Politics - 24 September 2006

http://www.wtopnews.com/?nid=25&sid=922158

Md. State Police Stop Suspicious Vehicle; No Charges

LAUREL, Md. - Maryland State Police say they released a 24-year-old Israeli man without charges Friday night after questioning him about photographing the Fort McHenry Tunnel in Baltimore.

Investigators say another motorist reported that a man driving a green Dodge minivan was using a camera and appeared to be taking pictures as he drove through the tunnel.

Police say the van continued south on Interstate-95 and then turned back in the other direction near Laurel.

A bomb-sniffing dog checked out the car but did not find any explosives.

Police say they found a laptop computer and a digital camera containing pictures of the tunnel inside the van, but nothing else suspicious.

2006-09-24 15:43:26 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." -Benjamin Franklin

I see enough viciousness on this forum, and the corruption (moral and financial) is blatantly obvious.

2006-09-24 15:41:06 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

It is a matter of fact now, yet some people still believe otherwise, because facts don't matter to them and never did.

Meanwhile tens of thousands of Iraqis have been murdered because these very people cannot wake up and hold thier democratically elected Government to task for it.

That is the sign of a cowardly nation.

2006-09-24 15:36:48 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://blog.abovetopsecret.com/wecomeinpeace/2006/09/911_graphic_novel_the_real_ver.html

2006-09-24 15:33:38 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Clinton stated he made some mistakes about bin Laden. bush? Nothing. He can't admit to anything because it's always someone elses fault. He is partially at fault for 9/11and the bogus Iraqi war for freedom while getting our Valued Soldiers killed. I want to hear some real answers from actual Republicans about this, not the Neo-Cons who trash people. If you trash me, remember, I can add in my details and have the last word, so don't make me put your name up here calling you an idiot...

2006-09-24 15:31:34 · 11 answers · asked by linus_van_pelt68 4

because they aren't christians by what I was taught.

2006-09-24 15:28:30 · 10 answers · asked by Pokie 2

You cant beat a smart democrat in a debate. Good for you President Bill Clinton. Wallace almost crapped his pants and he stuttered so much

2006-09-24 15:17:48 · 41 answers · asked by ast5792 1

I know a few dead bodies that could just possibly run this country better than any administration since Ike.

2006-09-24 15:17:29 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

I love when Clinton emphasizes with his index finger...."I contracted to kill him..." (about bin Laden), that's great, you know, for a good intentioned Liberal. But it sort of sounds Republican to me. Any thoughts on this?

2006-09-24 15:17:10 · 8 answers · asked by Yo it's Me 7

Who flew the planes if 9 hijackers turned up alive?
How did a plane hit the pentagon if its over 100' long and only made a 16' hole?
Why were the engines of the plane missing if they are made of steel and titnium with a combined weight of 12 tons, and stell and titnium has a melting point of 2700F, with the fire less then 1400F
Why was thermite dripping from the towers, How did it get there?
Why was there a 1200% Increase in AA put contracts on 9-10-01
Why was all the evidence sold to china before anybody can invegigate?
How did the cell phones work so well at such a high attitude?
Why was william rodreiez, a janitor in the building, offered millions of dallors to shut up, and to not tell people he saw bombs explosing in the basement?
Why did the towers fall at the speed of gravity?
Why did the firefighters see bombs going off in the building before they got out?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change&hl=en

myspace.com/conspiracyalert

2006-09-24 15:16:32 · 19 answers · asked by www.st911.org 1

They're going to do it anyways.

2006-09-24 15:14:56 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-24 15:10:19 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

I just caught a clip of the Wallace interview with Clinton, and a glimpse of the Bush whitehouse response, saying basically that they have a different strategy than Clinton did, they will defend US by being on the offensive. Doesn't that ridiculous ploy, along with the currently hot media campaign to make Clinton somehow seem the fool for not getting BinLaden during his tenure, allow the Dems to take off the kid gloves already and take Bush to task for how he BLEW IT in preventing 9/11?! There was the memo about an imminent attack, the firing of Richard Clarke, the ignoring of terrorism as a concern during his first months in office.
Isn't this crap an outrage given that Bush ran on a platform of non-interference in foreign affairs, know-nothingness on international issues, did nothing but fire demote ignore or sweep aside the people left over from Clinton's time who warned him of the threat? especially when Clinton got grilled by GOP for his efforts at addressing these problems?

2006-09-24 15:04:20 · 13 answers · asked by Michelle H 2

2006-09-24 15:01:47 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-24 15:01:31 · 11 answers · asked by JabbaTheButt 2

2006-09-24 14:54:14 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AvR4Hngewx8iv1Ln_.7j6SDsy6IX?qid=20060924123442AAFNz3D

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AqRJH41ehsu0NYSa54EzfH3sy6IX?qid=20060924124012AASRvwn

2006-09-24 14:48:03 · 17 answers · asked by LiberalsUnited 1

They both sound really stupid.

2006-09-24 14:44:52 · 21 answers · asked by A. 1

I need a really interesting topic to do my school report on. I need 3 articles on this topic and it should be specific and not something over-used like abortion and gay marriage. I want something interesting that would get the classes attention. It can be political/government or something else is fine to.

Serious answers ONLY please!

2006-09-24 14:39:51 · 8 answers · asked by A. 1

2006-09-24 14:36:14 · 16 answers · asked by brocollicrown 1

2006-09-24 14:33:36 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

it seems to me like the media gives Clinton's opinions more weight than the current president's.

2006-09-24 14:33:13 · 12 answers · asked by Hot Lips 4077 5

2006-09-24 14:24:17 · 15 answers · asked by NO BIAS, JUST QUESTIONS 1

2006-09-24 14:22:08 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

It seems that, given today's problems with terrorism, things were a lot safer when the "Evil Empire" was around. The only thing we had to worry about was a major nuclear conflict and superpower proxy wars, not some guys blowing themselves up on trains and planes. Do you miss the old days? Also, do you think that James Bond movies were better when the Soviets were around? Should we attempt to get the Russians back into the game like in the movie Canadian Bacon?

2006-09-24 14:21:07 · 7 answers · asked by tonyend2001 3

I hope this allows a least a few people to see what things look like from the outside looking in and vice versa. The bottomline is that America is so unpopular because of this administration interventionalist policies, while America is pissed off at the world for not supporting us on our endeavors.

But I would like to here it from you the people whether American, European, Asian, Africa, South American, or Austrailian,

1) how do you feel about the state of the world
2) What do you feel that the United States should do now
3) If you were the head of state of your country what would you do to try to fix things.
4) Your opinion on Islam and George Bush

Please share what country your from just so we can get an ideal on why you my feel the way you feel.

This is not an anti american rant. I am simply curious.

2006-09-24 14:16:16 · 14 answers · asked by curtaincaller 2

the NY times today recently published a story about how the war in iraq has in fact, increased terrorist groups and their threat to our country.

what do you think of this? do you think we should leave or do we still have a legitimate reason for fighting?

2006-09-24 14:09:32 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

I've heard conflicting versions of this story. Are they trying to make them or not?

2006-09-24 14:05:28 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-24 13:58:37 · 13 answers · asked by Steven B 2

You'll see the theory batted around on Yahoo! Answers, the rest of the Internet, and also offline when you engage conversation with real people about 9/11: The Bush Administration staged the the horrific events of 9/11. Apparently 36% of America believes there is some merit to this idea. The conspiracy ideas abound: Explosives were planted in the WTC, a missile hit the Pentagon, a missile shot down Flight 93, and dozens of other ideas. The whole idea that President Bush did all of this deliberately actually seems to be gaining momentum. It's not just for the tinfoil hat crowd.

For the record, I DON'T believe that President Bush brought about 9/11. A group of OBL-led Al Qaeda terrorists trained in Afghanistan terrorist camps did it, and even THEY didn't know the WTC Towers would collapse.

So why is there this persistent and growing movement in the idea that Bush caused 9/11?

Note: If you're going to rant about the "librul media" or Clinton please don't bother posting.

2006-09-24 13:58:32 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous