Politics - 24 September 2006

2006-09-24 07:01:47 · 10 answers · asked by SHARATH 1

Do we need to stoop down so low whaen we can't debate with them. Attcking women is a sign of weakness in my book!

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=As6.h6t1txyBCTdivZePy2bsy6IX?qid=20060924104744AAYbYT8

2006-09-24 07:00:53 · 7 answers · asked by JS 3

accepting responsiblity for their actions
monogomy
a lack of visible piercing and tattoos
clear healthy skin
good health habits
wise selection of partners
higher intellect

2006-09-24 07:00:26 · 16 answers · asked by Super Shiraz 3

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/09/24/fox-clinton-interview-part-1-osama-bin-laden/

Hit the link that says VIDEO and WATCH a REAL President
speak and defend his decisions!
(Not stutter and pout like a spoiled rich kid like Bush)

2006-09-24 06:56:09 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Bush’s Own Spy Agencies Say Iraq War Worsens Terrorism…

The Iraq war has contributed to an increased threat of terrorism, according to an intelligence assessment

The report found that the war has helped create a new generation of Islamic radicalism and that the overall terrorist threat has grown since the Sept. 11 attacks.

Previous drafts described actions by the United States government that were determined to have stoked the jihad movement, like the indefinite detention of prisoners at Guantánamo Bay and the Abu Ghraib prison abuse scandal

How come Republicans are thrilled with the
idea that they are breeding MORE terrorists?

2006-09-24 06:53:53 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

The intelligence services report is in, the Iraq war has created the most fertile breeding ground for terrorism in the world's history. OK, you retarded neo-cons, have at me!!

2006-09-24 06:52:10 · 8 answers · asked by keepitsafe2think 2

We all know what you did in Vietnam, and the same shitz happening in Iraq. When will you blood thirsty Neocons admit to us that you messed up in Iraq. If that's too much to ask, then at least admit to us that you love killing black people.

2006-09-24 06:51:32 · 7 answers · asked by Pero 1

nose rings and other facial piercings
ankle and lower back tattoos
multiple partners
mulitple divorces
multiple children by multiple men
mulitple abortions
abuse of public assistance
drug use
STDs

2006-09-24 06:47:44 · 17 answers · asked by Super Shiraz 3

why wern't there any christians who fought against these atrocities?

2006-09-24 06:45:45 · 12 answers · asked by The internal demon 1

I wonder it because the majority of progressives in Europe are totally against american politics.

2006-09-24 06:44:50 · 3 answers · asked by rdnoval 2

I am alleging nothing, casting no aspersions and nothing is implied.

Conspiracy theorists have weighed in on every monumental event in America's history, from the explosion of the USS Maine that lit the fuse of the Spanish-American war right up to the present day. My question surrounds two of these and an essay answer is required.

The theories: FDR knew Pearl Harbor was to be attacked. GWB knew the WTC was going to be attacked.

Let's assume these particular theories to be true.

What purpose did they serve? Note: We can rule out economics for the first theory, as we were already making blood money from the Lend/Lease act. We can rule out the same for the latter as the economy was strong when GWB took office, an admitted legacy of the Clinton administration.

Question: Would you have launched a pre-emptive strike against Japan?

If so, what is the difference between that action and the argument for the pre-emptive strikes occurring now in the middle east, under GWB?

2006-09-24 06:42:56 · 7 answers · asked by Samurai Hoghead 7

I thought liberals were tolerant and compassionate as well as being for all people regardless of race, education, orientation and economic levels?

I guess i was wrong.....

2006-09-24 06:42:10 · 11 answers · asked by Super Shiraz 3

2006-09-24 06:40:16 · 5 answers · asked by JS 3

How is that a reply to any question? I have been told that so many times.Really though how is that an argument that makes sense.If you dont like it, then leave?

2006-09-24 06:37:54 · 19 answers · asked by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5

How's this "I don't suck nearly as much as Bush" And other ideas?

2006-09-24 06:36:28 · 10 answers · asked by JS 3

Is that an actual political party?

2006-09-24 06:33:17 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

they are united alright , against the UNITED STATES, which at times don't seem to be united all that much. why don't we just say to hell with the U N and get the hell out and stop supporting them and their anti U.S. policies.

2006-09-24 06:30:07 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

To be fair, he came into office with the odds stacked against him. His predecessor was a youthful, charismatic leader whose following seemed more like that of a rock star than a politician. And the nation was coming off years of peace and prosperity. In many respects, he had nowhere to go but down. Nonetheless, consider the following:He took office under circumstances that some consider suspicious, even treacherous.Many argue that he cynically used goodwill the nation bestowed upon him in the wake of national tragedy to lead us into an unpopular and unwinnable war.He expanded the scope of the federal government in ways no one could have foreseen, adding new roles for everything from education to Medicare, even as the cost of the war spiraled out of control. Many feel his final legacy will be one of bloated government and fiscal bankruptcy.Furthermore, his determination to do things his way, combined with disdain for detractors, has earned him a reputation for being petulant and insular. Not exactly traits we might hope for in a president.

2006-09-24 06:28:03 · 9 answers · asked by The internal demon 1

Serious question here. Some friends and I were talking about this earlier today. I was just curious as to what you all thought about it.

2006-09-24 06:27:16 · 13 answers · asked by Madness_75 2

2006-09-24 06:20:28 · 8 answers · asked by The internal demon 1

Torture in Iraq is worse now than it was under the regime of Saddam Hussein and "is totally out of hand", according to a United Nations investigator.

"The situation is so bad many people say it is worse than it has been in the times of Saddam Hussein," said Manfred Nowak, a UN special investigator on torture, at a press conference in Geneva.

Thank you America. We hope to see your President in court for violating and humiliating humans in Iraq, as well as not doing a god damn thing about it.

2006-09-24 06:18:32 · 11 answers · asked by Pero 1

2006-09-24 06:13:14 · 12 answers · asked by Tofu Jesus 5

http://www.newswire.co.nz/main/viewstory.aspx?storyid=338106&catid=17

Tens of thousands of protesters have gathered in the British city of Manchester calling for Tony Blair's resignation and an end to the country's involvement in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

2006-09-24 06:12:58 · 14 answers · asked by Pero 1

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/usattackiraq;_ylt=AhjLCuu85hZUAMto8IMVt2oDW7oF;_ylu=X3oDMTBhcmljNmVhBHNlYwNtcm5ld3M-

2006-09-24 06:12:49 · 7 answers · asked by AntiDisEstablishmentTarianism 3

stupid? Or uneducated? Or say that you parrot liberal talking points?

2006-09-24 06:11:28 · 8 answers · asked by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5

Divide and conquer. There are quite a few who have been convinced that this country is broken down into two black and white categories, left and white, lib and con. I see these questions ALL day....libs blaming cons, cons blaming libs and both sides using strawman arguments to spread lies about the opposing side. And I am tired of it. Is there anyone else who agrees with me and who may have an idea how to get both sides to see that they are only hurting themselves?

2006-09-24 06:11:17 · 9 answers · asked by FaerieWhings 7

They made a huge profit on hummers by cutting back on armor, at the cost of our troops' lives. I think our troops deserve more and better support than that.

2006-09-24 06:10:13 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

If he were as great as you claim he wouldnt need defending.
Like little sheep, its so cute.

2006-09-24 06:07:07 · 19 answers · asked by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5

2006-09-24 06:06:19 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

this is really not nice. it examplifies the hatred you have for those who have more or less then you....what is your malfunction?

2006-09-24 06:03:31 · 5 answers · asked by Super Shiraz 3