when liberals like you attack him on every level, making no sense at all by compairing him to Hitler (who was responsible for 20 million dead), and calling him more dangerous then BinLadin, and claiming he lied to us to get into this war (forgetting that Clinton, John Kerry, and the U.N. All claimed Iraq had w.m.d.'s even while Bush was only a Governer of Texas), well Pardon us all over the place for responding, and even defending him. Keep in mind that if Clinton had done ANYTHING at all while al-quida was at war with us (American embassy's in Africa, U.S.S.Cole (17 American sailors dead), etc... Maybe 9/11/01 would have been just another dull day in America
2006-09-24 06:27:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think whats pathetic is the general behavior of the Democratic party
In a time of War the Demo-thugs stand united in one thing
a totally negative attitude towards everything
They are still so POd about the elections that they are still trying to unwedge their panties, its tough when you loose not one but two general elections, so I can appreciate your anger
You loose control of the Senate and the House of Representatives as well so like i say i can appreciate your anger and hatred, that spews forth on TV and in the BIG magazines(that no one reads) like Time and Newsweek.
So I can like really see it from your perspective
you know
but theres one problem you guys need to come up with some
solutions you know
hate speech and venom only go so far
you need to let your mmm leaders know that its time to do something concrete come up with a plan, to take back the power
that you have lost.
Something other then Cindy Sheehan and Code Pink
something the general population can understand as being logical and having purpose
So you might think that Bush is pathetic
but he's a Republican and he's the President
to repeat he's President and he's not a Democrat
put that in your pipe
2006-09-24 06:20:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by tanner_1122 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
You ask why do Republicans help George Bush. Umm with the aid of fact he's a Republican i assume. an poor lot of human beings do no longer see that he has disgraced the rustic and on an identical time as i'm no longer pleased with him I voted for him (i'm a Dem) with the aid of fact the Dem occasion produced such awful applicants. in many situations situations it is easy to bypass with the bypass that's the damaging press and assume that the whole u . s . does in comparison to Bush. he's a war time president and thats consistently no longer elementary. The is likewise an assumption that the best points made my occasion interior the final election propose doom for the Repubs and thats might or won't be so. the individuals who gained seats gained them by ability of being reasonable Dems and not raging libs and additionally they unseated Repubcs by ability of being better moderates than they are. however the national election would be distinctive tale. If we deliver out lots of of loons on the national cost ticket then we can lose the White residing house back. Congress is purely Dem now by ability of a pair seats and we've Congressional elections springing up back in 2 years. in case you watch the information you will type the tip that the whole u . s . hates W and that must be so with the aid of fact Danny DeVito and Barbara Streisand do...yet thats no longer the whole vote casting inhabitants. i do no longer think of the rustic thinks that Bush has disgraced the rustic, we purely want a bettere. many times what my occasion famous incorrect with Bush is how he speaks and that somewhat does no longer ring strongly with something of the rustic...a lot of whom talk the comparable way. we could no longer have John Edwards and the Pres candidate with the aid of fact he's southern and talks humorous.
2016-10-17 21:33:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pathetic behaviour is as much a part of politics in every party as the plus and minus sign are in basic math.
I think a better analogy would be that of lemmings following their chosen leader over a cliff with no thought to their own survival potential.
In closing, the democrat's support of the communist traitor Bill Clinton's seems no less pathetic.
2006-09-24 06:20:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by alltanksgene 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Actually this is just another ignorant liberal statement.
Bush has an embarrassing Border Security policy.
Bush has an embarrassing Immigration Reform policy
These things you can fairly and justifiably criticize him on. The liberals pander to the thought that EVERYTHING is Bushs fault. Your like a broken record. Try reading a book or something....
2006-09-24 06:15:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
And YOU people are like sheep in believing every nasty thing about him whether or not it's true. What's so pathetic about that is that you can't even see it as if you are so independent. That's not cute; it's sooo sad. Wake up and smell the truth, hon. You aren't any better than those you criticize.
2006-09-24 06:09:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
What is pathetic are the inane points the liberals make that we have to defend against.
2006-09-24 06:10:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Random Precision 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
you can use the sheep arguement about democrats who follow the DNC like sheep. your own medicine. if we wouldnt defend him then youd spread your misinformation and try to convert non-leftists.
2006-09-24 06:15:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by kunta kinte 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
It sure is pathetic! I just hope the Democrats take over congress in November!
2006-09-24 06:09:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Feathery 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
how sweet you are. like a little sheep putting Bush down.
2006-09-24 06:10:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋