Politics - 3 August 2006

2006-08-03 08:56:11 · 11 answers · asked by COblonde 3

2006-08-03 08:55:31 · 4 answers · asked by erik c 3

I thought we were not suppose to grant privelege to any group in america .

2006-08-03 08:54:55 · 17 answers · asked by playtoofast 6

They praise cop killing - so long as they're American cops.

http://no-pasaran.blogspot.com/2006/08/visit-to-saint-deniss-mumia-abu-jamal.html

2006-08-03 08:47:01 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

I see many people say that marriage should be between a man and a woman. How about if we creat 'gay marriage' and that has the same rights as marriage, but it's called gay marriage so nobody is confused! Would it then be OK with you?

2006-08-03 08:45:37 · 20 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

2006-08-03 08:44:40 · 7 answers · asked by playtoofast 6

Well, some have said gas should only cost about $1.80 per gallon if we removed the excessive fees to pay the suits.

If we nationalised oil, removes those high paying jobs, and kept oil non profit to keep the prices low, wouldnt the auto industries be in better shape? wouldnt the economy boom?

2006-08-03 08:33:27 · 10 answers · asked by kool_rock_ski_stickem 4

My name is Dahem Alqahtani a high study student from Kuwait.
I am writing a research about how the cabinet work(goverment) in many countries and compere that with my country .

so I'll be thank full for you if you help by answering these questions ( i need any information even if it so little and if you have Web site that can help me please tell me about it ):

1) how the cabinet work in your country ?
2) who prepare its schedule?
3) how many commutes it has ? and who are the member ( minsters )?
4) do the cabinet have a Specialists who can give the commits the advises?
5) do the cabinet ask the Non governmental organizations its opinion in its meeting ?
6) from where the cabinet get the ides of laws and dissuasion's ?
7) do the cabinet use the IT ( Internet) in its work ? how is that ?


THANX

2006-08-03 08:28:10 · 1 answers · asked by Dahem A 1

used cars home s and everything are not taxed a second time .

2006-08-03 08:25:54 · 11 answers · asked by playtoofast 6

And if so how much support should we give? Should we commit troops or just send money and weapons?

2006-08-03 08:24:49 · 8 answers · asked by Ethan M 5

by making the cost of borrowing lower americans spend more money and our econemy would grow.

2006-08-03 08:23:20 · 6 answers · asked by playtoofast 6

"I was talking with few friends of mine (Christian Lebanese) who arrived to America this past weekend, rescued by the marines and American ships off the shores of Beirut. They said that as the Marines were helping the Muslim (American) ladies on the ships, these Muslims were cussing them out in Arabic. The Muslim (Americans) being rescued were sitting on the decks saying (in Arabic):
Death to you (meaning our marines), death to America and Israel. You are the source of the problems. All our misery is because of you."

We should bring them back and drop them off over Beirut in bomber planes.

2006-08-03 08:23:18 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-03 08:20:46 · 9 answers · asked by cigarin 2

I will not vote for anyone in 2008, because no one represents me?

Some reasons why:

1. No one is trying to invent a real electric car to save on gas prices?
The republicans never will thats for sure.
2. We are being dragged into War World III, because of Israel and Bush and no one can do anything it.
3. The democrats are not liberals today anymore.

Do you agree and will you join me?

2006-08-03 08:16:34 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-03 08:11:43 · 17 answers · asked by playtoofast 6

It's time to say the truth. The best way would be for the FBI / DOD to

release the missing frames of the pentagon's cctv video,
release the cctv video of the "mysterious hotel" (the Sheraton National ?),
release the NEXCOMM/CITGO-gas station video,
release other videos or photos like the Virginia department of transports, or from the sites over which flight 77 flew on 9/11,
kindly ask the BBC, public media of the United Kingdom, USA ally, to release the images shown during Ehud Barak's interview on sept. 11,
allow independent experts to examine the debris of the crash on the pentagon, with witnesses having gathered these debris to identicate them,
make some holes in the newly brought materials on the pentagon helicopter field, down to the original soil, and verify that there is no uranium on it.

Public opinion, inside the United States and outside, must ask the United States senate and Congress to open an investigation on pentagon crash. Senators and congressmen must know the truth. They must know how and why the Bush administration has engaged their country into dreadfull conflicts in the middle east. Sign the petition on line !

The results of the official investigation commission on the 9/11 events, (see their web site or archived hearings) are just intended to frameup properly what happened. The hundred of pages to accuse "the bureaucracy" (with no name) to be responsible, and could be resumed ironically by the formula "it's the systemic's fault", are just a way to take the victims, the families of the victims, and the citizens of this planet for gulls.

It's up to the citizens of the United States of America to react and push their authorities, evenly after changing these authorities, to find out what happened really on september 11 2001 : this could need to go through a revolution, in the spirit of the eigtheenth century.
This must be analysed, for all earth's citizens, as a failing of the form of democracy so much praised by the occidental countries, which turns to be a plutocracy easily turned to facism. A new world order is necessary, and we, citizens of planet Earth, must build it, in respect of justice, fairness, international laws, environment protection. Brutal military or economic force must be eliminated. What convinced me that Flight 77 was not the Killer Jet
by Dick Eastman
Part 1 http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman1.htm
Part 2 http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman2.htm
Part 3 http://www.apfn.org/apfn/77_deastman3.htm

2006-08-03 08:06:09 · 32 answers · asked by tough as hell 3

I think Israel kicks a s s. The only thing I do not agree with that Israel has done is the fact that it destroyed the whole country of Lebanon. Other than that, I think they are doing a great job to fight terrorism.

2006-08-03 08:04:32 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

just a pc term for "suckass"?

2006-08-03 07:53:51 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

all those who do not attend do not get the arm braclet attached that makes them non combatants and all others are detained on the spot when found in public .

2006-08-03 07:50:31 · 8 answers · asked by playtoofast 6

All I want is a reason. "well, i'd rather give a democrat a chance to fix things before letting another republican get in office just to mess things up even more" is not a reason. "to fix EVERYTHING the REPUBLICANS screwed up!" is not reason. " What plan do the Democrats have to make you want to vote for them?

2006-08-03 07:46:32 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

Doesn't our constitution guarantee life, liberty and the pursuit of hapiness? If being homosexual makes someone happy, don't they have that right?

2006-08-03 07:45:23 · 10 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6

see if bush was a right wing christian.

2006-08-03 07:45:15 · 5 answers · asked by joseph m 4

READ REVELATIONS OF ST. JOHN.

2006-08-03 07:42:16 · 24 answers · asked by joseph m 4

Israel claims it's justified in bombing civilians because Hezbollah mingles with them. In fact, the militant group doesn't trust its civilians and stays as far away from them as possible.

Throughout this now 16-day-old war, Israeli planes high above civilian areas make decisions on what to bomb. They send huge bombs capable of killing things for hundreds of meters around those targets to destroy them, and then blame the inevitable civilian deaths -- the Lebanese government says 600 civilians have been killed so far -- on "terrorists" who callously use the civilian infrastructure for protection.

2006-08-03 07:39:17 · 14 answers · asked by freindly asian 1

2006-08-03 07:39:13 · 6 answers · asked by HEY boo boo 6

Everybody complains about who is running the country no matter who it is anyway. As long as we have control of the world, then we are ok, so, I think the only time we should worry is if we are attacked on our own soil.

2006-08-03 07:30:58 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

"Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger."

-- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials


Can we not see these types of transparent lies spammed over the American landscape today by our "elected" administration? Are we not becoming a completely Fascist nation (if not already there)??

2006-08-03 07:29:15 · 17 answers · asked by jaike 5

2006-08-03 07:29:00 · 4 answers · asked by Brand X 6

Sometimes I find myself turning on Fox News and turning the volume down just to give them ratings if i'm busy.

tired of the stereotypes.

2006-08-03 07:14:29 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

"The president has adopted a policy of "anticipatory self defense" that is alarmingly similar to the policy that imperial Japan employed at Pearl Harbor(later called a war crime), on a date, as an earlier American president said it would, lives in infamy. Franklin D. Roosevelt was right, but today it is we Americans who live in infamy.'

2006-08-03 07:11:57 · 12 answers · asked by whydothedumboutnumberthesmart? 2