Politics - 22 July 2006

2006-07-22 06:36:58 · 9 answers · asked by stent 2

http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/6/27/162325/829/

There is a link of Canadian scientists [not American left haters mind you] and they go over many of the flaws and lies in Gore's movie "A Convienient Lie"...hehe. Anyway...these scientist take the top 5 lies of the movie and with footnotes and references debunk the heart of Gore's movie.
Look folks. I agree the climate is changing but the left is usint that change as a way to push their own diabolical agenda. Here is proof. Why hasnt a democrat gov totally embraced solar panels on houses in the building codes? How about the wind. Google it and see how many advances there are. How about those torpedo things submersed in the water and the currents spin those blades and create electricity. You dont even see them! You can daisychain a couple hundred and put them in the ocean. other countries have been pushing this but we dont. If our left leaning brethern dont embrace it than global climate change is not what they say it is.

2006-07-22 06:32:00 · 5 answers · asked by marco 1

2006-07-22 06:30:30 · 10 answers · asked by Bill 6

immediate full payment, then foreclosed on the lands forcing homeless Palestinians to move to the cities to get jobs? Then these homeless men were prevented from getting work because they were not members of the Jewish labor unions? Did you know that the British killed the Palestinians who would not give up their homes to Jewish families?

2006-07-22 06:27:20 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Everyone I know is like "Oh my god, she's so awful! She's so dumb! If she becomes President, I'm moving to Canada!"
Yeah, I can respect an opposing opinion-- but when I ask them WHY they dislike her, they end up saying something like "Ugh, yeah, well she's married to Bill Clinton! He sucks! He had an affair! Oh my god, she's so terrible!"
Sorry, but that makes absolutley no sense-- it's not a valid statement, it's not backed up or justified, and it just makes the person expressing such feelings look like a complete moron.
So, the question I pose to you is: If you dislike Hillary Clinton, WHY? What has she done wrong? I'd prefer an answer that doesn't mention Monica Lewinsky or focuses entirely on Bill Clinton.
I'm not looking for someone to agree with me or say "Yeah, she rules!", but rather someone who may dislike her but has enough brains and common sense to not make stupid, unfounded claims.
If you do happen to like her, feel free to express your opinions as well.
Thanks!

2006-07-22 06:24:46 · 22 answers · asked by doubled254 3

you always have your nose's in someone elses business and can never leave well enough alone .
IT is your medeling in everones affairs that has lead to 9-11 and the state of the middle east.THIS is not bushes fault it is the policies of the last forty years led by special intrest groups in an attempt at world domination .THESE groups are the churches , the state of ISRAEL and the fortune 100 companies of america .
you must have everyone doing as you beleive is the right thing and all of us are not willing to march along to your tune regardless what you may believe and an end to your plot is coming soon .
THAT have of america that does not vote willrise up and take america back before long .
REMEBER october 1917 .when the people rose up against the corruption and practices of people such as your-self

2006-07-22 06:23:33 · 8 answers · asked by playtoofast 6

"In case of the removal of the President from office, or of his death, resignation, or inability to discharge the powers and duties of the said office, the same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by law provide for the case of removal, death, resignation or inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what officer shall then act as President, and such officer shall act accordingly, until the disability be removed, or a President shall be elected."

US Constition Article II, Paragraph 6

2006-07-22 06:23:13 · 4 answers · asked by abehagenston 2

http://fromisraeltolebanon.info/

2006-07-22 06:16:55 · 25 answers · asked by googlefan 1

There is plenty of doumentation describing how Jews were disliked in Europe. No question there. The Biblical reference to the promised land is something which is only found in Jewish writings and not confirmed in any other literature contemporary with the writing of the Torah, so it does not have enough validity (sorry to those who choose to "believe"). Jews moved into Europe of their own accord during the time of the Crusades because they were the only major group who could travel freely between the Middle East and Europe. they set up trade routes and towns. for the last thousand years there has been no major event in the Middle East displacing Middle Eastern Jews . Can anyone tell me something factual that would convince me that my judgment is wrong on this issue?

2006-07-22 06:13:26 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I thought they were anti-war. Are they hypocrites?

2006-07-22 06:08:15 · 8 answers · asked by Bill 6

fiction... just curious about what my fellow yahooers think about this.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8795795223394289910

2006-07-22 06:06:59 · 13 answers · asked by hardartsystems 3

That's it....just WTF, man.

2006-07-22 05:58:57 · 31 answers · asked by kubrickian 2

I am looking for a website that I have found before that by filling out a survey online that it was able to show you what political party you fit into, and also shows where politicians like Bush and Kerry fit in. I believe it showed a diagram with four boxes, and showed where you fit into the diagram. Also, I know that one of the questions were whether or not us citizens should all have health care coverage whether or not they can afford it. If nobody knows this website in particular, a similar one would also be great! Thanks for your time!

2006-07-22 05:53:54 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

I really don't think he deserves a pass just because he's president. Let's impeach and jail the SOB.

2006-07-22 05:50:31 · 13 answers · asked by kubrickian 2

2006-07-22 05:42:18 · 6 answers · asked by American Superman 3

Bush's decision to invade Iraq as part of the "global war on terror" made America a party to the conflicts on the ground as never before. Saddam Hussein's regime, loathsome as it was, provided a strategic balance to the power of a radicalized Iran. Now the invasion has put Washington head-to-head with Tehran. The confrontation is military, economic, political, ideological, direct and indirect, overt and covert—and on several fronts the Iranians appear to have outmaneuvered the administration. Prominent Iranian journalist Mashallah Shamsolvaezin, who is also an expert on Lebanese affairs, suggests that Tehran's next step, far from making war, will be to present itself as a peacemaker. "This will present another opportunity to show its regional power," he said.

2006-07-22 05:40:41 · 8 answers · asked by Ronald Reagan 2

Don't they realize that if Bush had just read one tiny little memo, 9/11 may have been prevented.

You know, the memo titled "Bin Laden May Be Planning To Attack America Using Commercial Aircraft".

The one he was shown in mid-August. The one he didn't read until 9/12

I bet Gore would've read the memo.

2006-07-22 05:39:56 · 25 answers · asked by kubrickian 2

ones that show what a poor public speaker he is?

2006-07-22 05:39:29 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

They all want seperation of the races. They all preach hate, and they all are completely cross grain to what America are all about.

Why do I even bother I'll just get reported for hate speech.

2006-07-22 05:38:44 · 20 answers · asked by Ethan M 5

China is a good candidate? And let's say this new power decided to put the Mao Mao people (they don't really exist) in California (or anoy other state) because the US is powerless (for argument's sake). The Mao Mao started ethnic cleansing. Killing and raping Americans.

The UN declared California an independant state called Maoland!

What would you do as Americans? Remeber you don't have military power!

2006-07-22 05:35:14 · 5 answers · asked by Mas S 2

supply of black people I get reported for hate speech but nobody reports someone who ask questions about how the president should be killed? Maybe it is because the left (especially the ones who place the race card) have no intellectual honesty?

2006-07-22 05:34:24 · 5 answers · asked by Ethan M 5

A few pointers, moron......
#1. It looks petty to avoid speaking to someone for five years because they disagree with you.

#2. When you finally do decide to get off your high horse and speak, don't act like you're honoring them with your presence.

#3. You probably shouldn't be lamenting the rift between the Republican party and blacks, especially considering you cause the rift.

#4. You aren't funny. You never have been. You usually come off as either retarded or mean spirited.

#5. Stop trying so hard to make people like you. They don't. They never will. The word is out. You're an a hole.

2006-07-22 05:32:31 · 10 answers · asked by kubrickian 2

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article14081.htm

transcript:
www.democracynow.org

what is your opinion?

2006-07-22 05:18:02 · 4 answers · asked by boogie man 4

do you support isreal and its allies...or not? why or why not?

2006-07-22 05:17:05 · 9 answers · asked by masry 2

is it just a PC term now? they are victims to me, nothing heroic about sitting in an office biulding and having a plane smash into you.

now the firemen are different, that is truly risky to run into a building like that, but would they have if they knew it might collapse?

2006-07-22 05:14:34 · 7 answers · asked by mricon 2

I believe that he will be recognized as one of the worst presidents this nation has yet seen.

2006-07-22 05:11:40 · 34 answers · asked by kubrickian 2

http://www.hrea.org/lists/display.php?headline_id=4204&language_id=1

Iraq is actually getting more civilized while Afghanistan is falling back into the stone age. Islam is a disease

2006-07-22 05:09:11 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

heavy pockets of peole with cancers lived in the neworleans area prior to katrina as evidenced by several studies not yet fully completed .MOST of the people had lived in the community for life and those who had died of cancer and where suffering where part of a government study .DID the un released findings cause the people of the community to be dispuresed in an effort to avoid billions in clean up and civil suits of companies to the north that used the river as a toxic waste dump that pooled in the delta area an affected the minority's who did not have money to purchase exspensive water purification systems heavily used in the area for 30 years now .how long have they known of this and why where business and wealthy home owners urged to install water purification systems back in the 70's

2006-07-22 05:03:38 · 8 answers · asked by playtoofast 6

2006-07-22 05:01:54 · 44 answers · asked by Antoine 2

2006-07-22 04:56:53 · 22 answers · asked by Mr Davo Sir 1