Other - Politics & Government - November 2007

if any,

the one you believe represents the best of both partys??!!!

not the extreme left or right, but the one that will represent the good policy's and values of both sides of the political forum??!!!

and if ya still got a caffiene buzz goin from this morning, tell me why you feel that way!!!

2007-11-28 05:33:13 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-28 05:28:34 · 11 answers · asked by Yahoo Answer Angel 6

2007-11-28 05:07:18 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

1. Pay for health care when it's needed, fee for service.
2. Choose not to pay for health care, and spend the money on fast cars and loose women.
3. Obtain job skills that will result in a great job with health care benefits and a fantastic vacation package.
4. Purchase your own health insurance privately.

Don't you just love the flexibility and versatility provided by this great country?

2007-11-28 04:48:42 · 9 answers · asked by Yahoo Answer Angel 6

http://www.abcactionnews.com/Default.aspx

Our local Tampa Bay affiliate is carrying the details all day. SO far they interviewed Cooper who said U tube questions are asked then he has another... if the candidates get argumentative they have each been given alloted times to respond...
It's a big deal here. Ron Paul was also interviewed... I hope the link works so you can keep up. Any thoughts on tonight?
Added this spanking bill was written by a woman careg iver and may be placed into law ??? Numerous countries have such a corporal punishment restriction. How will deflect these as he is Gov of MASS?? Target zero? Keep chiming in if you will. I am hoping for a debate about before and after. Thanks in advance.

2007-11-28 04:42:59 · 8 answers · asked by Mele Kai 6

2007-11-28 04:41:45 · 5 answers · asked by Yahoo Answer Angel 6

socialist nation of their choice? It'll be a one way ticket, and if the socialist wants to return, they have to sneak across the border like the group they want votes from.

2007-11-28 04:28:28 · 3 answers · asked by Yahoo Answer Angel 6

1) Employers wouldn't have to provide Health Care.

2) Employees would be able to leave a job they didn't like, but were tied to because of the benefits. Employers and Employees would benefit from this. People could pursue their entreprenurial activities more freely. Employers wouldn't be stuck with employees that didn't want to be there.

2007-11-28 03:37:17 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-28 03:29:26 · 7 answers · asked by leslie 1

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7117430.stm
The link above says she has been charged now, why do you people think she is not guilty, she should be made to pay, i live in uk and respect all thier ;laws i would never call a soft toy after a god or deciple.......what do you think about her being found guilt and wot should her punishment be, 100 lashes with a whip made of goats tail or a fine?

2007-11-28 03:25:25 · 32 answers · asked by mr.truth 2

Why would the poor and middle class be against social programs that are made to help them when the rich and super rich grab all the money from the economy causing their financial down fall?

2007-11-28 03:08:18 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-28 03:03:25 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

Ok, they made a big deal about the millions that have been spent on new sirens to warn of an emergency at Indian Point Nuclear Power plant.

They just ran a test and it is the OLD sirens that are being used (you can tell, because the old sirens spin around).

What's the point? Shouldn't they be testing the new sirens?

2007-11-28 02:37:33 · 1 answers · asked by 2007_Shelby_GT500 7

Wait, it wasn't a corner, it was a circle. I'm right back where I started. Hillary s*cks.

2007-11-28 02:18:21 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

and how can the queen be a 'regime' anyway?

I thought a regime was a political system, so the 'monarchy' can be a fascist regime but not the queen per se.

Or am I being too ana.l about this?

2007-11-28 01:47:15 · 15 answers · asked by jollyboy booboo 2

I gotta say, they liberals have a beat on us.

2007-11-28 01:26:24 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-28 01:21:05 · 11 answers · asked by Strats!! 4

But when someone like a Kucinich or a Ron Paul comes along, or a Joe Binden, and run for government...why is it that people dont elect them?

It would be easy to do this....yet people always seem to choose the candidates that continue the liars circle.

When is america going to wake up and get a real leader like kucinich or Ron Paul in office?

2007-11-28 01:16:56 · 2 answers · asked by writersbIock2006 5

so much info about aliens do you really think there real

2007-11-28 00:54:39 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

intelligent answers?
Why is that?

Instead you get, a complete list of every other person group or organization and how corrupt the others have been, almost as if the arguement is "these people do it so can we"

But the fact remains, that its not "they can do it so can we" that others are trying to argue to justify their actions or corruptivity...its the republicans and fox supports who are trying to make the arguement -- "since everyone else does it so can we"

Wheres the integrity in that type of attitude?

Does this prove that republicans need help on the definition of integrity an fox viewers need help the definition of "journalistic integrity?

2007-11-28 00:52:13 · 8 answers · asked by writersbIock2006 5

It cracks me up - it really does!

2007-11-28 00:43:29 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

THIS IS RESPONSE TO A QUESTION ON FOX NEWS TRIAL:
Just reported the FACTS of the case, and how FOX NEWS argued it -- no biased whatso ever -- just the facts.

- - - -- - - -- -

fox was taken to court by reporters that didn't want their stories twisted


During their appeal, FOX asserted that there are no written rules against distorting news in the media. They argued that, under the First Amendment, broadcasters have the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on public airwaves.

- - - - - - - - -- - -

Immediately, the answerers response was THUMBS DOWN.

Does this Prove that Fox Viewers dont want the truth?
That they will argue with Facts?
That they will do whatever it takes to prevent the Truth from being reported to the people, if it doesnt favor their opinion?

Thanks for helping me prove my point

2007-11-28 00:26:28 · 7 answers · asked by writersbIock2006 5

2007-11-28 00:23:38 · 5 answers · asked by Scouse 7

INDIA is not spiritual and non violence. Haridwar Uttarakhand has persecuted,capture,torturated spanish NGO members .We have canceled our programes in Haridwar Pushkar and Calcuta 1200 children. India has apropiate ilegaly and with violence our ground for educational programes.Violence against handicap unable spanish NGO member.INDIA MUST give our resources back.Further info. This Human Creature.org.uk, we have been 100 days hunger strike and atrocities still we will report worldwide as well as a book of our experiences in India will be editated so as the world can see unjustice and untruth of Hardwar Mr. Sudansu and Tiwari government.1200 children no hope INDIA must return our resources as it is now for latinoamerican children.Also wacth out Spanish hunger strike in India for a vegetarian football team. Our programes are not only sports but educational ones.,also looking after sicknes abandone animals etc

2007-11-28 00:20:49 · 3 answers · asked by tueresmidios 1

Also, how are you notified when benifits stop, phone call, letter...?

2007-11-27 15:56:36 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

y and y not

2007-11-27 14:46:03 · 10 answers · asked by sure y not 1

So people can make more money--moonlight--and this is what we get:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071127/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/final_five

That's great, new coinage--but we want to MAKE MONEY/EARN MONEY

High paying jobs, and where did all the moonlighting jobs go?

2007-11-27 13:54:56 · 1 answers · asked by dollysj 2

2007-11-27 13:50:19 · 4 answers · asked by blah 2

2007-11-27 13:36:35 · 9 answers · asked by wooper 5

2007-11-27 11:53:45 · 3 answers · asked by gogether20052009 1