English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

intelligent answers?
Why is that?

Instead you get, a complete list of every other person group or organization and how corrupt the others have been, almost as if the arguement is "these people do it so can we"

But the fact remains, that its not "they can do it so can we" that others are trying to argue to justify their actions or corruptivity...its the republicans and fox supports who are trying to make the arguement -- "since everyone else does it so can we"

Wheres the integrity in that type of attitude?

Does this prove that republicans need help on the definition of integrity an fox viewers need help the definition of "journalistic integrity?

2007-11-28 00:52:13 · 8 answers · asked by writersbIock2006 5 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

8 answers

You do realize that you attacked another group of people because they attacked another group of people?

There is no integrity in the behavior you described, or portrayed.

2007-11-28 00:57:57 · answer #1 · answered by Teekno 7 · 4 0

Corruption is everywhere in government, and that's exactly why we cannot understand Liberals. They believe the rhetoric that government is the answer. Conservatives are very unhappy with the Bush Administration and it's spending habits.

Ever hear the Democrats talk about cutting anything? The debate 2 nights ago was based on who has the ability to pay MORE??


Which party created the term "Culture of Corruption"? And which side believes the Democrats will not steal from us? Less than 1 year after the Democrats used that term to win in NY State, we have more corruption scandals than ever. The local liberal paper gives these guys a free ride, and writes things like "now it's time to learn from their mistakes". It is unbelievable, and this liberal behavior enables politicians.

2007-11-28 08:58:49 · answer #2 · answered by Stereotypemebecauseyouknow 7 · 2 2

There's no integrity in that type of attitude. But those people are also not the core of what the Republican Party has been about. Instead of insulting us as a whole, why not help us take our party back from these corrupt individuals who are now in control? The average Republican is as disgusted by this attitude as you are.

2007-11-28 09:00:49 · answer #3 · answered by skip742 6 · 0 2

In your explaination.. why would you continue to target only one news media (ie FOX) if as you say all are doing it?

Why not target all media in your posts with 'suggestions' and questions to improve them all?

Makes little sense to keep trying to point a finger at one group. (shrugs)

Edited to add: Why are you 'attacking' the above anyways? How about healthy debate? Questions-answers? Give take? learning growing?

Swaying people based on your point of view rather than 'beating them into submission. (result of a successful attack)

2007-11-28 08:57:18 · answer #4 · answered by Destrier 4 · 3 0

Gee are you and the other lefty attacking Fox 2 different people or the same one? Enquiring minds want to know?

2007-11-30 00:33:42 · answer #5 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 0 0

Think of it this way:

How stupid is somebody who laughs at another for picking their nose when they dig deeper than anyone?

We are just pointing out the stupidity of Fox bashers. It's easier than showing them why they are wrong in principle. They wouldn't agree anyway.

2007-11-28 08:57:52 · answer #6 · answered by Philip McCrevice 7 · 3 0

Well your "question" pretty much says it all. When you "attack" anything or anyone, you're going to get very emotional answers or retribution for your attack.

If you ask questions about things without attacking, perhaps you'll get more reasonable answers.

2007-11-28 09:01:22 · answer #7 · answered by Mark A 6 · 2 0

The pot calling the kettle black. classic!

2007-11-28 09:32:39 · answer #8 · answered by cowboysfan 4 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers