Other - Politics & Government - April 2007

criminals already carry guns everywhere, shouldnt law abiding citizens do the same?

2007-04-22 18:04:49 · 21 answers · asked by William L 2

2007-04-22 17:52:49 · 10 answers · asked by Noneya B 2

Or a very strict set of gun laws?...as for me...not a chance in hell

2007-04-22 16:53:30 · 27 answers · asked by William L 2

You spent your whole life studying science, you devoted yourself to it like a religion in order to help mankind. While others were out binge drinking you stayed home studying thermodynamics, kinetics, and quantum mechanics. While most were sleeping you were awake, plugging differential equations into computer simulators. And now those same people who were out binge drinking are telling you that you don't know what your talking about, your making it up to get grants. These hannity sheep think they know more science than you, an mit graduate. How would you hold yourself back?

2007-04-22 16:21:14 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

a link would be good

2007-04-22 16:15:52 · 3 answers · asked by redalert 2

i wonder if we need all those reps from different parties. aren't we all individual enough without adding yet another thing to divide us?

2007-04-22 15:29:00 · 20 answers · asked by carolyn n 2

Please state the profession and describe the corresponding hat. Thank you.

2007-04-22 15:13:50 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-22 15:03:13 · 32 answers · asked by Derek J 2

Also, via TPM Cafe, here’s Gen. Tony McPeak, who served on the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the first Gulf War:
The war in Iraq isn’t over yet, but — surge or no surge — the United States has already lost. That’s the grim consensus of a panel of experts assembled by Rolling Stone to assess the future of Iraq. “Even if we had a million men to go in, it’s too late now,” says retired four-star Gen. Tony McPeak, who served on the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the Gulf War. “Humpty Dumpty can’t be put back together again.“
What Kissinger, Odom, McPeak, and Reid understand is that the mission in Iraq has changed. The United States is now stuck in the middle of a civil war to which there is no military solution, only a political one.


http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/04/01/asia/AS-GEN-Japan-Iraq-Kissinger.php

2007-04-22 14:58:51 · 1 answers · asked by Reba K 6

Let see now, you might prevent the assasination of Abraham Lincoln or John F. Kennedy. Will you prevent him assasinated at all cost? Why do you want to protect him? If not, why do you let him assasinated?


PS: If you know someone is going to assasinate PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH, but you're the only one capable to prevent that to ever happen... would you do whatever you could to save BUSH' life... or you just let him assasinated for his own good...?!?

2007-04-22 14:02:07 · 39 answers · asked by Professor Franklin 4

2007-04-22 13:52:51 · 1 answers · asked by patrioticamerican1776 1

2007-04-22 13:41:46 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

are they going to call him the first gentleman, the male equivelent of first lady, or are they going to call him something else?

2007-04-22 13:19:52 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

i need arguments oppising this and affirming this....please anything will help!!!

2007-04-22 12:59:25 · 7 answers · asked by lreyna13 1

Do you think it should be illegal to ban them in all schools (Unless you are underage) and that more people - especially teachers should take the initiative to carry them?

2007-04-22 12:57:07 · 18 answers · asked by Lancaid 3

The world economy would have to be reduced by at least 25% to even come close to stoping Global Warming but in order to do that you'd have to force them. And most of them are not going to like that, not to mention the fact that you'd have to force people in other countries to make changes which could be impossible.

So if Billions of people are not willing to make the major scarifices needed to stop Global warming what is the point of trying to stop them at all? A 10% reduction in the economy will NOT stop Global warming.

2007-04-22 12:20:28 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

Please help before tomorrow! 10 points!

2007-04-22 12:19:34 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-22 12:03:54 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-22 11:33:51 · 7 answers · asked by DARMADAKO 4

See this video regarding Roy Beck and his important presentation regarding the problems with current U.S. immigration policies:

http://y o u t u b e.com/watch?v=n7WJeqxuOfQ
[Remove the spaces]
Or from this link:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5871651411393887069

Note: This video doesn't even mention the illegal immigrant issue. However, open border policies will only exacerbate the problems.

Have you wondered why most illegal immigrants seem to overwhelmingly support the Democratic party? Might it be because even they know that Democrats are the party associated with gov't funded give-aways?

Why is there talk of giving current illegal immigrants a fast-track to citizenship? Isn't this a slap in the face to others who immigrated legally and have waited to fulfill their residency requirement?

Can this be tolerated? Is the party of the left trying to hijack the whole process we've lived with for over 200 years?

How do YOU feel about this? Intelligent thoughts welcome.

2007-04-22 11:26:53 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

That if he made a documentary film about a zombie holocaust like Dawn of the Dead, liberals would be rushing out to buy guns and ammo etc. But if the liberals shoot the zombies, aren't they denying the zombies their rights to eat human flesh?

2007-04-22 10:11:30 · 13 answers · asked by George D 3

If not, why not? If so, what are the usual grounds?

2007-04-22 08:29:31 · 8 answers · asked by Buffy Summers 6

2007-04-22 08:19:57 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous

1. pass laws
2.borrow money
3. tax
4.make treaties ?????

2007-04-22 08:18:05 · 6 answers · asked by ArmaniCode 1

2007-04-22 08:11:15 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-04-22 08:01:26 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm writing an essay for my college class, and I chose to write why the war is bad. I'm running out of ideas. Was wondering if anybody could tell me why they think the war is bad.

Thanks

2007-04-22 07:54:42 · 27 answers · asked by pocho 2

Which one should be the more important political topic?

Just for kicks, I decided to look up some statistics about firearm related deaths in the US and compare them to alcohol related deaths in the US.

According to the CDC, alcohol was the contributing factor in almost 76,000 deaths in 2001. 35,000 of those deaths were caused by chronic health related conditions associated with alcohol. That still leaves 41,000 deaths such as DUI related, suicide, and accidents. The Brady Campaign website statistics for 2004 attributed close to 30,000 deaths to firearms.

If alcohol is killing more Americans than guns are, then why don't we hear an outcry for stiffer alcohol laws and enforcement? Why is it that teenagers (or adults, for that matter) can walk in and buy alcohol with little more than a glance at an ID, but I have to have a background check, go through a waiting period, and fill out all kinds of paperwork to purchase a gun?

Does anyone else see the hypocrisy in this?

2007-04-22 07:29:18 · 12 answers · asked by Marc 3

2007-04-22 07:06:37 · 23 answers · asked by Saccharin 3

possible?
Why?

2007-04-22 06:44:03 · 5 answers · asked by seth_nightlord777 2