Do you think more law abiding citizens should carry concealed weapons. Especially in schools?

Question

Do you think it should be illegal to ban them in all schools (Unless you are underage) and that more people - especially teachers should take the initiative to carry them?

Answer 1

Gun-free zones invite trouble, because a potential murderer knows that his victims will be unarmed and unable to defend themselves.

So I am perfectly okay with teachers having guns in schools, and with college kids bringing them.

You have the higher crime rate BECAUSE OF gun control, not IN SPITE OF.

Answer 2

In general I believe that more citizens should carry concealed weapons, however when it comes to Public schools I think it would be best if the security personnel and teachers that have been trained to use a firearm were the only ones that were caring, I wouldn't want 18 year old students caring guns in school. When it comes to college anyone who can get a concealed carry permit should be allowed to carry

Answer 3

I think the opportunity should be given to law abiding citizens to carry concealed weapons most everywhere. But the person carrying should be of legal age, certified in it's use, and licensed. Also it should have to be holstered on the person not in ...say a handbag that might easily be stolen.
The tragedy that happened this past week in Virginia might have been stopped if a prof or student had had a weapon also.

Answer 4

Yep. Teachers should have the right to carry a gun in class if they want, but they are subjected to more stress than other civilians, so need to be better psychologically evaluated and trained than other civilians who wants to carry a gun.
Also, there are teenagers that show remarkable maturity, calm, education and self-control for their age (16-18 years old), and I think they can be allowed to carry a gun in school after passing a serious psychological examination, training, and emancipation. I heard about 14-16 year old boys jumping in a fire or a frozen river to save younger kids. That kind of courage, calm and maturity can save lives in a shooting situation. NOT everyone is a nutcase.

Answer 5

No! We don't want another replay of the Virginia Tech massacre. The business which sold Seung Cho his gun thought he was a law abiding citizen too, didn't they? What is needed is a waiting period, where a person's psychological record can be checked and verified. That would go a long way to reducing the number of incidents we've seen the last few years. If gun sellers have to wait a while to see their profits, or if profits fly out the window due to rejected applicants, too bad. There are things in life more important than profit. Things like life itself.

Answer 6

I think that every man, woman, and child should be allowed to carry their own ammunition. It's a constitutional right. And think about it: if EVERYONE had a gun, would the VT shooting have escalated to the point that it did? Nope. Maybe one person would have been killed before everyone else whipped out their own firearms and shot down the gunner's a**. Criminals will always have guns, and there will always be criminals. People should take more initiative and buy their own damn firearms instead of complaining about how criminals have them. God bless America.

Answer 7

only if they go through extensive gun safety and use training and they get a mental health evaluation by a psychologist. maybe it would be better if everyone just wore bullet proof vests and riot gear...
ok honestly, do we want our kids growing up in a culture where they are paranoid that everyone else is going to shoot them unless they are armed to the teeth?
DIdn't any of you have a crazy teacher in school? I had one that thought there were flying elephants in our class and she hid under the desk. I would have been filled with holes while that loon tired to bust a cap in Dumbo.

Answer 8

As all of us understand, Federal and State governments have desperate on our behalf how the 2d. substitute could be reinterpreted. Regardless we've the astonishing to maintain and bear hands as our forefathers wrote this substitute which has no longer something to assert approximately how cutting-side interpretation could be used. So if politics's comes to a decision to place in writing rules that contradict the rights of our shape then it incredibly is them that are breaking our first rules. So, no count what they say, they are able to't incredibly clarify why it incredibly is this kind of earnings to our way of existence. rules are for could be criminals.

Answer 9

Yes. The only way to stop crime is be allowed to defend yourself. How long does it take a cop to show up after you've dialed 911? When a crime in being committed there are only two people there -- the criminal and the victim. And the victim is the only person that can stop it. The police show up to clean up the mess and say they'll find the guy that shot and robbed you.

Answer 10

a gun free zone is a good idea, until someone brings a gun there. I think it is so stupid that they allow air marshels to bring a gun on a plane, or have armed guards inside of prisons or courthouses, its just a recipe for disaster. It gives a false sense of security, but a criminal or terrorist dont have to risk trying to bring their own guns on, they just take away the one there. A true gun free zone, is an area where guns are both not allowed and are not there and are not going to be let in.