That if he made a documentary film about a zombie holocaust like Dawn of the Dead, liberals would be rushing out to buy guns and ammo etc. But if the liberals shoot the zombies, aren't they denying the zombies their rights to eat human flesh?
2007-04-22 10:11:30 · 13 answers · asked by George D 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
LOL!! Good one!
2007-04-22 10:14:54 · answer #1 · answered by Dave_Stark 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It's not about "belief" - it's an established fact. Gore is not a scientist, he's just reporting on the science. If it's not 100% accurate, that doesn't mean it's 100% wrong. I know that there are still people who think the phenomenon is up for debate, but it's not - certainly not among scientists, or the Pacific Islanders whose countries are disappearing under rising oceans. In fact the planet is warming faster than most predictions had foreseen. We are almost certainly past the point where we can do anything to stop it, and now we have to start planning on how to adapt to it. It won't be easy, and it will be painful. So get your head out of the sand, turn off the idiots on Faux News and try a little reality.
2007-04-22 17:20:29 · answer #2 · answered by thesbrian 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Probably would want the zombies to be able to eat flesh, and would have Sharpton leading the parade....
...and as far as Al Gore's documentary, he is using the word documentary incorrectly, as His film is not based on anything but Fiction...
..the only global warming problem we have is the "Hot air" that comes out of Al and Cronies! Of course who wouldn't believe someone who has claimed to invent the Internet?
...I think I will stick to letting the "Real" scientist tell us if there is a problem, not a delusional Lib!
2007-04-22 17:22:04 · answer #3 · answered by Rada S 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think we are all so similar here...we Liberals believe there is an imminent danger because of pollution and Conservatives see Terrorists around every corner.
Either we are both completely off our rockers...or we're both partly right.
Hey ya gotta dig Andy in Dawn of the Dead. He should have made it out alive. Even though he was probably a conservative, he deserved a better end.
2007-04-22 18:23:04 · answer #4 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I like to quote Sheila Copps the former deputy Prime Minister from Chretien's government in the mid 90's
Maybe Gore got his idea's from her and owes her a big fat check
2007-04-22 17:25:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
liberal lemmings. There was no scientific method used. If it were then every scientist in every lab would always come up with the same result. Wrong. Computer modeling was used. All of you lemming back away from the cliff.
2007-04-22 17:20:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree entirely! Those zombies have a right to individuality! Al Gore's Film was so full of holes it might aswell be swiss cheese.
2007-04-22 17:16:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
The flaw in your question is that Gore is respected because he uses evidence that is based on the scientific method. the same method that is used to power your car, fly your planes and save your ignorant *** from infection and disease.
2007-04-22 17:15:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Gore's movie is dumbed down in the hope that he would be able to reach conservatives.
Wrong.
He used words of over 2 syllables, and that definitely won't cut it.
2007-04-22 17:16:33 · answer #9 · answered by billiebob 1 · 2⤊ 3⤋
By global warming believers, you mean everyone in the world except you and jim inhoff?
2007-04-22 17:15:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
You're right. We should all just bury our heads in the sand like you.
2007-04-22 17:15:21 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋