English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Other - Politics & Government - December 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

2006-12-07 16:11:09 · 15 answers · asked by mkf_lanka 1

just chillin4now

2006-12-07 16:08:03 · 24 answers · asked by onAhhroll 3

I believe they did it on the principle of preserving his civil liberties vis-a-vis his right to privacy.

Will this make the heads of ACLU bashing conservatives explode?

2006-12-07 15:58:45 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Why or why not?

To provide it means to give it for free, but there will be taxes of course so might not fit the definition of totally free.

Remember details are awesome.
Thanks everyone

2006-12-07 15:48:39 · 21 answers · asked by mike m 2

I am taking a poll of how americans really feel without takings the press reports. Should we be allowed to carry concealed handguns? Automatic wepons?

2006-12-07 15:40:22 · 38 answers · asked by us_pilot 2

I'm personally pulling for McCain or Guiliani.

2006-12-07 15:06:07 · 23 answers · asked by tree daddy 2

..is to cost upward of 20Billion pounds.
If I interpret Blair's actual words we need the 'credible threat' of nuclear retaliation to deter a nuclear strike from a 'rogue nation'
Why don't we just fake a 'weapon of mass destruction'? Would this strategy be sufficient to fool these nations into not going to war? And can I have a share of the money saved, since it was my idea??

2006-12-07 15:03:38 · 5 answers · asked by troothskr 4

And alcohol and marijuana isn't

2006-12-07 14:58:49 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

drug charge, fbi

2006-12-07 14:54:34 · 10 answers · asked by terry t 1

European Socialist promised on Thursday, to work to rebuild Europe's strategic alliance with the United States, now that the Democrats control Congress after last months election.
Well, I think that says a lot.

2006-12-07 14:43:09 · 4 answers · asked by zzz 2

So many people only get there news from the main stream media and beleive that to be as the gospel of Luke. So they dont know,for the most part,that plans are in the works now for doing away with our boarder,and our precious soverenty,nor do they understand how devestaiting this will be to every aspect of our lives. Your thoughts on it now.....

2006-12-07 14:29:20 · 7 answers · asked by hardknott2003 2

For my sociology class, I have to write a paper on how to convince Americans that education vouchers are a good idea. I already collected all the info about how people would benefit, etc., but don't really know how to rally support for the topic. THANKS FOR YOUR ADVICE!

2006-12-07 13:55:19 · 6 answers · asked by HanHoggle 1

Lets assume that the corporation does business all over the world, and is a major competitor in it's respective market. However, due to high labor costs, including the cost of health insurance, and some poor management decisions, the company is projected to go under within 24 months unless it can receive aid from the government. Should the government help it, or let it fail?

2006-12-07 13:05:25 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-12-07 12:29:45 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

What does that mean to you? Do those that obsess with internal enemies (finding enemies from amongst their follow citizens) act unpatriotically? Are media personalities and politicians who emphasize out differences to their own gain guilty of a mild form of treason?

2006-12-07 12:22:57 · 2 answers · asked by You have 23 characters to work 3

2006-12-07 11:53:37 · 13 answers · asked by NONAME 2

Although it was touted to get a concensus through bi-partisan means I can't help but criticize it's flaws and failures. Their conclusions are nothing more than a bunch of regurgitated Democratic proposals. The persons in the group "ALL" --had pro-war stances prior to the occupation. They "ALL" have had Washington insider jobs. I think this group's net worth will be nothing more than getting the new Sec. of Def confirmed and his feet wet in the quagmire--considering they/he never left the green zone. Still more baffling is the lack of "real" experts. Their study will have as little impact as the guy in Chicago that emulsified himself on a street corner in protest of the war. When will the day come when Bush calls the press conference and admits his wrongs. How can any human being be raised without a conscience to the level this man was? Any normal individual would be overcome by the guilt to the point of confession just to keep from committing suicide. What are your thoughts?

2006-12-07 11:37:21 · 7 answers · asked by scottyurb 5

What if two brothers were given authority to rule over this nation and protect it's borders from foreigners and change the laws to please God, promote peace and harmony, and make corrupt that which is incorruptible?

2006-12-07 11:28:39 · 7 answers · asked by TAHOE REALTOR 3

2006-12-07 11:26:54 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

And why do they keep insisting that the invasions of other Europeans thousands of years ago is a good argument for the progress of England to be of mixed race and Islamic?
When in the future of England will there be no Christmas and no one looks anything near what they did for thousands of years previous?

2006-12-07 11:17:17 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

Have you seen the epidemic in congress lately, everyone gone retard and can't answer crap

2006-12-07 10:59:41 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

...by those blasted speed cameras? By the way I was doing 36 on a 30 for all those smart alecs who may want to patronise me

2006-12-07 10:53:36 · 4 answers · asked by antagonist 5

The goverment want to double the council tax throughout the UK.
Why do the public stand for all the liberties being taken?
Other examples are,
Increased bills way above inflation.
Pay per mile motoring.
Congestion charges.
Speed cameras.
Putting old people in jail for non-payment of council tax yet murderers walk free.
Taxpayers funding wars and refugees instead of the money working for the communities that earned them.
Bad roads.
Bad NHS.
No houses.

A goverment should do the will of the people, not the other way round.
I want to know why there is no voice of the majority to say "enough"?

2006-12-07 10:46:41 · 23 answers · asked by eireblood 4

I keep hearing from conservatives that comments critical of Bush and the war are what's causing us to fail over there.

If we had just made such speech illegal from the beginning, would the sectarian violence never have started, and would the insurgents have handed in their weapons by now?

2006-12-07 10:17:57 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

im being dead serious, i think if i took political science for a few years and know enough to know how to run as president, that i could honestly make wiser choices over hillary clinton. I have an I.Q of about 130. I think Hillary is a kiss a** and why does she always do Hillary Rodham Clinton? The middle name thing? Does that make her more important to know she has a middle name?

http://www.votehillary.org/CMS/node/735

"You know, we find it in our scriptures when we ask, what are we to do?,You know the answer, do justice, love mercy, walk humbly with your God." -Hillary Clinton

That is her stand on running the governent, and i probably could come up with that when i was a 13 year old. I can tell that she doesnt like war, nor do i, but she has the wrong view about it ,and, terrorist could attack our main country because she isnt willing fight. She thinks that everyone is reasonable, she couldnt be anymore wrong. Wrong integrity to be my president, what do u say?

2006-12-07 09:55:44 · 10 answers · asked by jared l 4

fedest.com, questions and answers