Accountability to the people who have the vouchers would do it.
The trouble with the school system is the system not the teachers. The system is designed now to place almost all the responsibility of learning on the school and the teachers. There are 3 groups of people that have a vested interest in a childs education: the community, the parents, and the child.
The educator is representing the rights and responsibilities of the community in the classroom. However, the community is not requiring the parents or the students to shoulder their responsibilities. It is not the teachers fault if the kids cannot behave or pay attention. It is not the teachers job to begin to solicite these things, however popular societial ideas and the courts think differently. When the community starts requiring parents and students to be equally responsible the problems will disappear.
How to do this with vouchers, attach them to the family income. How?
A report card is a legal document issued by the state to the child to indicate progress at school in various aspects of development but primarily academic.
I suggest that we include behavior and attendance (or participation).
These three indicators could be monitored and issued progress reports to coincide with tax season. A student not in attendance, behaving properly, and receiving passing grades would not be considered a dependent, could not be deducted from income taxes, not being included as part of EIC, would not qualify for any type of government funded programs without oversight and intervention. The voucher would be such a program. However, this would only work if school attendance was optional and not mandatory.
It worked on me.... go to school or go to work
choose wisely
if you start messing with people's money they pay attention to the problem
2006-12-07 14:29:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
School vouchers would be the death of public schools. We do not need to take money from public education to provide it to private schools. Our public school system is in serious trouble, and vouchers would make it worse. After awhile only the poorest of the poor would be in the public schools and our society would suffer greatly.
2006-12-07 14:09:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by irongrama 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
relies upon on what you advise with the help of reform. it relatively is a state of certainty that in case you have no longer have been given mastery of English in u . s . of america, you will no longer have the skill to realize your skill. So, in case you reside in El Paso or New Mexico as an occasion, you in all probability talk English at homestead even although your super-super-grandparents got here from Mexico. once you're in la, that may no longer the case. So the phobia isn't progression and globalization particular is falling flat these days with the dollar somewhat valueless. the certainty is which you would be able to no longer make it in this united states in case you have an accessory. My grandparents consistently spoke English around me because of fact the kiss of loss of life replaced into to sound like a Latino. So, i do no longer talk the linqua paterna, yet ya know, I even have in no way been grew to become down for a activity.
2016-10-14 06:03:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
you would have to prove that vouchers would provide a better education at a lower cost. i don't believe in the voucher system, so i would be very difficult to convince.
2006-12-07 14:24:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by grumpy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Listen, we are a segregated society. WE live different because we ant to live different. Whit women who marry black men talk like black women. We re a segregated society, by choice. School vouchers might enable learning, but more they will segregates people by their lifestyle.
2006-12-07 13:58:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know... the only way I could think of is the old "the government is inefficent, private business is effiecient argument"...
2006-12-07 14:01:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋