English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm personally pulling for McCain or Guiliani.

2006-12-07 15:06:07 · 23 answers · asked by tree daddy 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

23 answers

Bill Gates...and here's why:
1. Bill is rich
Let’s get this one out of the way. Yes, we believe being absurdly rich is a good thing for any presidential candidate. Why? This candidate could make a great statement by paying for his or her campaign from his or her own pocket. We honestly believe this to be extremely important. Large corporations don’t sponsor candidates expecting nothing in return. Even when elected, Bill won’t need to scoop up tax-payer’s money: he has more than enough.

2. Bill is rational
Rational thinkers rule. We know quite a few people may argue with us when we say we’d rather have a rational thinker taking decisions that impact our lives than someone who just ‘goes with his guts’, or ‘goes with what the pope has to say’. We however think rational thinking is crucial in a global context, a context in which not everyone is a Christian, a Muslim or a Jew.

3. Bill isn’t selfish
With the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Bill has already shown the world he’s not a selfish man. Some people might call giving to the poor and supporting the needy liberal, but we prefer calling it responsible. We believe the United States with Bill as president would act more responsibly not only in its foreign policy but also when it comes to handling social problems within the US. Bill says: “To whom much has been given, much is expected.”.

4. Bill knows management, and he can prove it
Being president is more than saying yes or no. It’s decision-making at the highest level and it’s constantly keeping your guard up. In his many years at Microsoft, Bill has shown us he’s an exceptional manager. Bill can not only handle pressure, he’s used to it.

2006-12-07 15:14:43 · answer #1 · answered by kevin_82485 2 · 0 0

Rudy Guliani - why - he has good mangerial skills and he is a credible leader. He seems to have good listening skills and seems to consider the thoughts of others. I like what he did with New York during the 90s ( understands big business and how large cities are ran).
He's a little weak on foreign affairs from what I know of him, but I doubt that anyone could do a worse job on foreign affairs and diplomacy than Bush. Hell, I think I could have done better.
Granted, I am a democrat, I don't see anyone other than maybe Gore as a real possibility. Hilary is a nice lady, but I haven't seen any strong leadership or managerial skills - at best we would be hoping for Bill to step in - which wouldn't be fair to her. I do think America is ready for a woman prez, but maybe not her. Hell no to Condi Rice. Smart lady - not prex.

2006-12-07 15:20:04 · answer #2 · answered by s_bodhi 3 · 0 0

i imagine that it truly is really going to be an quite close race, convinced human beings say we want some thing new, like Hillary or Obama, yet you may want to appreciate the Southern Republican perspective, (no longer that i'm announcing that i'm both southern or republican) yet I do stay interior the south, maximum folk the following imagine that Hillary is only evil (no comic tale I really have seen someone say their youngster became allergic to Hillary) yet as well human beings received't be waiting for some thing different, I do not ignore that cases have replaced, and that race and sex do no longer matter in maximum folk's eyes, yet there are nonetheless those those who trust that Bush did some thing good in Iraq, and that he turned right into a good president. That being reported it ought to really finally end up being an previous white guy, because it really is what it continually is, me in my view I plan to vote for Obama, yet Ron Paul, Giuliani, or Edwards will probable win. perchance there'll be yet another pollerror. putting Chad everybody??

2016-11-24 22:17:57 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I used to like McCain until he sold out and went to bed with Jerry Falwell. I used to like it better when he spoke his mind rather than selling out the way he's doing and Guiliani seems like a nice guy, but like Newt Gingrich, anyone who turns on his family the way he has can't be as nice as he seems. He'd make a great Jewish lobbyist the way he tals lately; I guess you have to these days to get into higher office.
I hope we get a few good choices OR I hope McCaine bad mouths the hypocritical evangelical right wingers like he used to.

2006-12-07 15:11:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

In order of preference, I'd vote for these Presidential candidates:
1. Colin Powell
2. H. Ross Perot
3. Ron Paul
4. Evan Bayh
5. John McCain
6. Barack Obama
7. Nancy Pelosi
8. Kinky Friedman
9. Anyone who is not a Republican or Democrat
10. Anyone with no previous political experience
-RKO-

2006-12-07 15:18:08 · answer #5 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0 0

Just so long as it's not Obama or Sir Hillary.

At this point I'd vote for Guiliani, but that will probably change as the time comes.

2006-12-07 15:08:51 · answer #6 · answered by cornbread 4 · 0 0

Kubby.

Actually, I'm a proponent of the guns and dope party, which says "Everyone for President!" but that's mostly a joke party anyway.

I don't know, maybe not Kubby. Any libertarian. Is Kubby even a libertarian? Oh, man, I don't know. I haven't really researched anything.

2006-12-07 15:10:38 · answer #7 · answered by PopeJaimie 4 · 0 0

Condileeza Rice, without a doubt...or Tom Tancredo should he choose to run. Or even Joe Lieberman, but I do not think he is a possible candidate anyways.

2006-12-07 15:11:59 · answer #8 · answered by LiaChien 5 · 0 0

I'd like Abraham Lincoln, but I'm afraid that's not going to happen. We'll be stuck with another mediocrity no matter who wins.

2006-12-07 15:15:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Condoleeza Rice

2006-12-07 15:08:07 · answer #10 · answered by Cuddly Lez 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers