Other - Politics & Government - October 2006

ESPECIALLY, when it does not coincide with their way of thinking OR it challenges their way of thinking? Seriously, I would like to get some real thought thru answers from CONS as to why they do this?

2006-10-10 09:39:09 · 16 answers · asked by politicallypuzzeled 3

2006-10-10 09:39:00 · 11 answers · asked by jacobfreinman 1

I guess 3, because 3 is the magic number.

2006-10-10 09:35:19 · 7 answers · asked by The Angry Stick Man 6

I have heard before that there are certain places that I can go to apply for grants and they will give you money to get land.

2006-10-10 09:31:28 · 4 answers · asked by the king of kings 4

What good are they doing just sitting there?

2006-10-10 09:30:37 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-10-10 09:30:26 · 8 answers · asked by tammy s 1

2006-10-10 09:25:39 · 14 answers · asked by crux_of_the_equation_is_in_the_? 1

2006-10-10 09:25:28 · 4 answers · asked by Sammy 3

2006-10-10 09:24:06 · 10 answers · asked by hunda b 1

Please help me understand why you hate America.

2006-10-10 09:21:58 · 23 answers · asked by crux_of_the_equation_is_in_the_? 1

2006-10-10 09:19:01 · 8 answers · asked by anythngfast0901 1

WMD's were not found in IRAQ. Prove me wrong with non-Right Wing Bullshit fake proof. Ok do it

2006-10-10 09:11:47 · 8 answers · asked by crux_of_the_equation_is_in_the_? 1

It makes no economic sense if Bush is pals with all the US oil producers. Crude oil is a commodity, the prices are established based on supply and demand and takes factors that may affect those two into consideration.

Iraqi oil was only avavilable through the corrupt Foor-For-Oil program, limiting thew world's supply of oil and driving the prices up. (Limit supply without altering demand equal higher prices for the commodity.) So the price of US crude would go up benefitting Bush's oil baron buddies.

By freeing Iraq and having the UN to remove the oil sanctions that created an much greater supply which would (theoretically) drop. The price drop would hurt Bush's oil buddies. The cost of producing the oil is constant, the cost of the price of worldwide crude is the variable that determines profit.

So if Bush went into Iraq for oil the result would have been to drive down world crude prices. How exactly does that benefit the US oil producers as many people here speculate?

2006-10-10 09:11:36 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous

The Government says racism should be stamped out but they breed it by changing wording like "winter lights" instead of Christmas lights. Some schools have stopped doing the nativity. So who are the racists?

2006-10-10 09:05:08 · 11 answers · asked by DERIAN 1

What is up with male/female equality! So women want to be equal to men right? If they want to be equal to us they expect us to treat them better than we treat our fellow men! I think that they really want to be better than us, be pamprered and not have to work like us to get our pay for example. What are your feelings on this matter? If you want to be equal with us you will get the same treatment, not better or worse but the same; and you will have to live with it. Please give me your feelings on this matter

2006-10-10 08:58:43 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

It can be environmental, economic, political. I'd just like your thoughts on this.

2006-10-10 08:51:22 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

If so, what do you think it will be?

2006-10-10 08:49:39 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

North Korea. Of course, they will only be there in spirit when that happens. What should we do. Can China apply enough pressure?

2006-10-10 08:43:20 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Would they force me to wear a blue suit?

2006-10-10 08:42:04 · 10 answers · asked by Nice Guy 1

Remember when Yorkshire tried to campaign for its own government (see http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlContent.jhtml?html=/archive/1999/03/18/nyor18.html for more info.) What ever happened to that? Do they still have a website or is there still even a campaign? Just wondering... they had there own flag and everything!

2006-10-10 08:39:22 · 4 answers · asked by Jack 2

2006-10-10 08:30:56 · 9 answers · asked by chrislamb_79 1

First we find out that clitoon could have had OBL multiple times and did nothing, which had he acted 911 might not have happened and now, North Korea has nuclear weapons.

What other debacles are going to pile onto the clitoon legacy?

After this one does anyone think his wife will be any different?

2006-10-10 08:29:16 · 11 answers · asked by rmagedon 6

2006-10-10 08:28:39 · 26 answers · asked by ? 2

This is regarding his Knowledge of the Foley emails

2006-10-10 08:25:21 · 8 answers · asked by martin 4

Oh...I can smell it coming....Pubbies will say Bush won't get impeached cause he 'did nothing wrong'. How about engaging in a fraud war that has cost thousands of American lives, wasted 500 BILLION dollars, created thousands of more terrorists. And to those will parrot the old....Dems won't retake Congress----well just keep dreaming duesch bags

2006-10-10 08:24:45 · 10 answers · asked by NONAME 1

Mayor Ray Nagin wants a “chocolate” New Orleans
On MLK Day, a day named in honor of a man who fought for equality, New Orleans Mayor and all-around bigot Ray Nagin called for a “chocolate New Orleans” - in front of a crowd that had gathered at City Hall for a MLK Day march:

“We ask black people … It’s time for us to come together. It’s time for us to rebuild New Orleans — the one that should be a chocolate New Orleans,” Nagin said Monday. “This city will be a majority African American city.
And in what could only be characterized as an imitation of Pat Robertson, Nagin added:

It’s the way God wants it to be. You can’t have New Orleans no other way. It wouldn’t be New Orleans.”

- He wants a chocolate New Orleans? Let's let Neslte build it for them then - We all know Nestle makes the very best chocolate!

2006-10-10 08:07:36 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Everyone will remember the name Mark Foley and what he did but Congressman Mel Reynolds(d) gets barely any mention. Why would the media saturate itself in a republican doing something disgraceful but not a dem who did something more disgraceful.

http://www.cnn.com/US/9611/07/reynolds.indict/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mel_Reynolds

2006-10-10 08:03:11 · 8 answers · asked by lend322 4

Dead in 2006 cause Dems retake congress and then, well, Bush, you better duck. Rasmussen also was dead-on correct in 2000 too. Is that the old evil elite Liberal media again?

2006-10-10 08:01:49 · 5 answers · asked by NONAME 1

i git thise question in my political study in philippines....many politicians in their country are former popular celebrity

2006-10-10 08:00:13 · 7 answers · asked by dukati h 1

I don't like republicans do in general, but one congressman can affect the whole republican party's polls with an near-sex scandal? That's kinda ridiculous don't you think. Its like implying that all republicans were in on sending sexy emails to minors.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061010/ts_nm/election_dc

I feel this is another indication that democracy or mobocracy is imperfect. You want to let the majority make big decisions, but you don't make them take time out to learn the issues. Therefore myths, TV campaign soundbytes, and religion take center stage. I think Americans should be required to study for 1 week out of the year on all major issues and reading viewpoints from both sides. That would be a true democracy. Right now, I feel it is a oligarchy struggling to please the whims of a mobocracy.

I love America though.

2006-10-10 07:55:07 · 19 answers · asked by Ilooklikemyavatar..exactly 3