Are there more messes to come from the Clinton foreign policy?

Question

First we find out that clitoon could have had OBL multiple times and did nothing, which had he acted 911 might not have happened and now, North Korea has nuclear weapons.

What other debacles are going to pile onto the clitoon legacy?

After this one does anyone think his wife will be any different?

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/1/7/164846.shtml

"The Hallmark Of Clinton Policy Was Supposedly The 1994 Agreed Framework, Which Banned Pyongyang From Churning Out Nukes In Return For Billions Worth Of Aid." ("Albright In North Korea, And More," The Weekly Standard, 7/17/06)

* "[A]s The North Koreans Have Since Acknowledged, They Spent Most Of The '90s Trying To Produce Weapons-Grade Uranium - And, In 1998, Launched A Taepodong-1 Rocket Over Japan." ("Albright In North Korea, And More," The Weekly Standard, 7/17/06)

* "Meanwhile, As They Diverted Foreign Aid Into WMD And Missile Factories, Millions Of North Koreans Died Of Starvation." ("Albright In North Korea, And More," The Weekly Standard, 7/17/06)

Answer 1

You mean he had a foreign policy?

The Clinton "policy" basically consisted of the "Bend Over Billy" style of managing foreign affairs (basically, bending over and taking it anywhere and any time foreign governments, or the U.N. for that matter, requested that he do so). Somalia was a good example of how ridiculous things became.

The U.S. seems to be in the process of taking the lead again and cleaning up the mess left behind in the wake from years of negligence and appeasement.

I guess Billy did not take enough polls regarding foreign policy and became confused. He never was good at making his own decisions and being resolute.

One cannot ask a boy to do a man's job.

Answer 2

Go away and quit blaming Clinton! You have a buffoon as a president!

Clinton didn't have OBL multiple times, and 9/11 had not happened! Bush hasn't been able to find OBL in over 4 years and I doubt if he is looking for them!

Weren't Reagan and Bush the presidents in the 80's?

North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons:
How Soon an Arsenal?
Sharon A. Squassoni
Specialist in National Defense
Foreign Affairs, Defense and Trade Division
Summary
North Korea ended the eight-year freeze on its nuclear program in late 2002,
expelling international inspectors and restarting plutonium production facilities. Before
then, the CIA estimated that North Korea might have enough plutonium (Pu) for 1 or 2
weapons. Since then, North Korea may have reprocessed the 8000 spent fuel rods
previously under seal at Yongbyon, yielding enough Pu for 6 or 8 weapons. In 2005,
North Korea announced it had nuclear weapons and was building more. It restarted
construction on two larger reactors, and shut down its small reactor, possibly to extract
plutonium. In July 2005, North Korea rejoined the Six Party talks after a 13-month
hiatus. Two unknowns in estimating the size of North Korea’s arsenal are the status of
its uranium enrichment efforts and whether Pakistani scientist A.Q. Khan gave North
Korea a weapons design, as he did to Libya. This report will be updated as needed.
Background
In the early1980s, U.S. satellites tracked a growing indigenous nuclear program in
North Korea. A small nuclear reactor at Yongbyon (5MWe), capable of producing about
6kg of plutonium per year, began operating in 1986.1 Later that year, U.S. satellites
detected high explosives testing and a new plant to separate plutonium. In addition,
construction of two larger reactors (50MWe at Yongbyon and 200MWe at Taechon)
added to the mounting evidence of a serious clandestine effort. Although North Korea
had joined the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty in 1985, the safeguards inspections that
began only in 1992 raised questions about how much plutonium North Korea had
produced covertly that still have not been resolved. In 1994, North Korea pledged, under
the Agreed Framework with the United States, to freeze its plutonium programs and
eventually dismantle them in return for several kinds of assistance.2 At that time, Western

1 5MWe is a power rating for the reactor, indicating that it produces 5 million watts of electricity
per day (very small). Reactors are also described in terms of million watts of heat (MW thermal).
2 See CRS Issue Brief IB91141, North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons Program.
Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress
CRS Report for Congress
Received through the CRS Web
Order Code RS21391
Updated August 1, 2005

Answer 3

Yer funny. I never cease to be amazed at the ability of those on the far right to point their fingers away from themselves. Kinda like the captain of the Titanic blaming the ship builders for not giving it better brakes. It's a matter of public record that the Bush "administration" repeatedly ignored warnings about Osama. Maybe it was all his parents' fault for not strangling him at birth. And maybe if the U.S. aboded by the nuclear non proliferation treaty other countries would too. Naming North Korea as a member of the "Axis of Evil" and therefore open to U.S. invasion probably didn't help.

Answer 4

do you know anything? first off, he did try to get OBL. He even gave Bush a plan on how to continue to try and get him, but Bush ignored it. He also worked a lot with N. Korea to keep this kind of stuff from happening. Did you ever hear about the N. Korea threat with Clinton? No, because he had him under control. Face it, the worst thing that happened to the US under Clinton was he lied about a BJ. That is nothing compared to Bush.

Answer 5

Former FBI Deputy Director John O'Neill wanted to investigate the very same terrorists who later said to be planning 9-11, but was prevented from doing so when President Bush signed Presidential Directive W199i, making it a crime to investigate or instigate the terrorists in any way. Resigning his position due to frustration, John O'Neill was given a new career as Director of Security at the Trade Towers in New York City. John O'Neill's first day on the job was September 11, 2001. It was also the last day of his life. Whatever reasons or suspicions Mr. O'Neill had, died with him that day.

Bin Laden steadfastly denied involvement with his statement, "I was not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States nor did I have knowledge of the attacks. There exists a government within a government within the United States. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; to the people who want to make the present century a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity. That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. ... The American system is totally in control of the Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States."

Even the FBI will tell you he is not on their "Most Wanted" list because there's not one shred of evidence to support his involvement.

With PNAC's plans for American world domination, you're still babbling about Clinton? Do you even actually KNOW anything about the people you so fanatically support, or are you just so caught up in your propagandist fanaticism that reality no longer matters?

When Bush assumed the Presidency, the men who created and nurtured the world domination schemes of PNAC became the men who run the Pentagon, the Defense Department and the White House. Vice President Dick Cheney is a founding member of PNAC, along with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Defense Policy Board chairman Richard Perle. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz is the ideological father of the group. Nevermind PNAC's White Paper's stating it woukd take "another Pearl Harbor" for them to initiate their plans. Blah blah blah all you want, or go to their website and READ IT FOR YOURSELF.

Our civil rights, liberties, freedoms, guarantees of due process, and protections from unfair treatment by our own government have been severely diminished by the Patriot Acts. Last week's "torture" bill shifted some powers from Congress to the President, further empowering him. Together, both documents VAGUELY redefine "terrorist" to easily implicate ANY American citizen as a "potential terrorist" or "potential enemy combatant" simply by the words MISSING from the document, that would protect us from such. While all this had been loudly pointed out in Congress, the bill was still passed, as is.

PNAC wants American domination and control over every nation on our world. WE will be the cannon fodder. Our nation is quickly becoming militarized, and we no longer have a say in the matter. WE are "acceptable losses" in their game of greed and power.

++

“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."
Theodore Roosevelt, 1912

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin

"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty"
Thomas Jefferson

Answer 6

Not to mention Sandy Berger stealing Clintons documents from the national archives during the 911 investigations..,wonder what was on those documents since he destroyed them,and selling our Military secrets to China and selling the capability of making the nuclear war head to N Korea.What a guy huh?And who could forget that hideous image of Hillary kissing the palestinian leader on the lips..,ewwwwww I wonder if that was the cause of his death.

Answer 7

There maybe soft Democratic, but overall they are more interested in National Security than greasing palms, Case in point. The Navy did not want another aircraft Carrier, but guess who gave them one, so name maybe extremely fitting.

Answer 8

Get a brain, turn off Rush Limbaugh and get some real news. Faux news is not it either. You cannot blame Clinton because Bush is a failure, to quote Ann Richards, that dog will just not hunt.

Answer 9

I'm sure there's a whole lot more skeletons in that closet. Who knows how much more old Billybob screwed up. Oh, and unscrew you and your bestbuddy Bush.

Answer 10

IT'S A DEMOCRATIC THING. THE DEMOCRATS ARE SO SOFT THAT THEY RATHER PAY OFF ENEMY'S THEN CONFRONT THEM. HAD CLINTON BEEN A REAL MAN IN STEAD OF A PERVERT THEN ALLOT OF THE CRAP THAT IS GOING ON TODAY WOULD NEVER HAVE HAPPENED. HILLARY SUCKS SHE BETTER NOT RUN FOR PRESIDENT.