This is regarding his Knowledge of the Foley emails
2006-10-10 08:25:21 · 8 answers · asked by martin 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Of course hes lying his lips are moving! Yes he had prior knowledge and probably advised Foley not to get caught with his pants down
2006-10-10 09:05:50 · answer #1 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Round Bottom –
is right of course, being a politician he is, by definition a liar.
In the Foley case, certainly either he or Reynolds is lying about what and when Hastert knew.
The most likely thing to be truthful is that they are both lying.
‘Lying’, by itself, does not disqualify a politician from anything. The problem here is that they allowed children to be exploited and abused for the good of the Party. It is a pattern, I’m afraid, they apply to all people, everywhere. Their personal power and party loyalty come before America or it citizens.
2006-10-10 08:37:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whether you like him or not, he is a smart man. Why would he risk his entire political career by covering up information that he knew would come out (no pun intended) eventually? It's Washington -- no secret is safe. The Speaker is NOT lying.
2006-10-10 08:35:34 · answer #3 · answered by Annie 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2006-10-10 08:29:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's a politician. When you see his lips move he usually lying.
2006-10-10 08:29:20 · answer #5 · answered by Jester 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ni I don't He had no reason to lie, although that reason didn't stop Clinton or Kerry or Kennedy(s)
2006-10-10 08:28:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
he's more of a prevaricator.
He is not lying, but he is certainly not telling the truth
2006-10-10 08:31:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-10-10 08:28:12 · answer #8 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋