Other - Politics & Government - September 2006

I see all these people posting that such and such website debunks theories about another such and such website. People don't seem to get that the "debunking" website just might be as biased in the other direction as the first website. Why believe one over the other? Just because it supports what you already believe?

I think what we need to do is look at both sides, weigh the arguments, and make our own conclusions. If you honestly have looked at both sides objectively and have concluded that the offical 9/11 commission report does tell what really happened, I applaud you for at least looking at both sides. But if someone hasn't ever considered the other side and have only looked at opposing facts with the mentality that it is wrong before even reading it, I can't really respect what he/she has to say.

I can completely understand people not thinking our government was behind it all, but to not concede that some things look fishy reeks of ignorant blissfullness.

2006-09-12 05:37:14 · 3 answers · asked by someguy 3

God in heaven, I hope not.

2006-09-12 05:34:27 · 5 answers · asked by Ha Ha Charade You Are................... 4

http://www.amazon.com/Blood-Money-Wasted-Billions-Corporate/dp/0316166278
Read The Summary.

2006-09-12 05:34:18 · 8 answers · asked by wjscottjones 1

On the movie Pathway to 911, I lost count of how many red flags and outright warnings that were given to our leaders.

2006-09-12 05:32:56 · 7 answers · asked by Ha Ha Charade You Are................... 4

What treaty, signed by Germany and the Allies, officially ended World War I?

2006-09-12 05:32:55 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

I watched parts of it... I've heard the different radio programs all morning talk about it... how can he sleep at night knowing he just made a speech on a day of rememberance for 3,000 people that lost their lives on 9/11 that was completely about Iraq and trying (DESPERATELY) to gain support and still trying to instill fear in the american people about terrorists "following us"??? It's embarassing to say he is this country's president... the fact he even got in office is a giant question mark.

2006-09-12 05:28:54 · 25 answers · asked by rjakjr 3

2006-09-12 05:28:30 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-09-12 04:59:58 · 23 answers · asked by Aamir Khan 1

2006-09-12 04:59:33 · 23 answers · asked by Aamir Khan 1

He has barricades set up to all his coronations and won't answer any phone calls (unless you have money). Does California need another "coin operated politician" as governor?

2006-09-12 04:56:33 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

They would be much safer there anyway. They could commune with the Lakota Sioux.

2006-09-12 04:53:51 · 8 answers · asked by nonjoo 2

its sad canada's pm doesnt make speech's to the nation on good channels i never heard him make a speech ... i havfta listen to bush.........................................

2006-09-12 04:52:40 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

The US punishes or threatens to punish Iran for its nuke program but Iran has signed this treaty and allows inspections. Israel has never allowed any inspections of its facilities at Damona. And please, no Israeli rhetoric about Iran "wanting to wipe Israel off the map."

2006-09-12 04:52:28 · 6 answers · asked by nonjoo 2

California's healthcare industry is raising rates with reckless abandon. Our level of healthcare, here in the San Joaquin Valley, is lower than many third world nations. Yet, our doctors live in mansions that would dwarf some of Saddam's palaces.
We're paying more in premiums and getting less in service and quality.
Yet, Arnold S. has declared "business as usual" and once again turned his back on California's working class.

I think we need to vote this bum out.

2006-09-12 04:51:33 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

The US punishes or threatens to punish Iran for its nuke program but Iran has signed this treaty and allows inspections. Israel has never allowed any inspections of its facilities at Damona. And please, no Israeli rhetoric about Iran "wanting to wipe Israel off the map."

2006-09-12 04:50:37 · 9 answers · asked by nonjoo 2

2006-09-12 04:46:14 · 5 answers · asked by TRANSLOPEDIA 4

2006-09-12 04:36:15 · 1 answers · asked by Caroline O 3

2006-09-12 04:32:27 · 9 answers · asked by Vid 1

They voted for him, didn't they?

2006-09-12 04:16:02 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

and yelling about this and that trying to continue there war on republicans......cant they realize the american people arent stupid and realize both agendas are about gaining votes to be elected...politicians are all crooks it just depends on how you view it, but obviously the democrats constant screaming becomes numb at a point and people stop listening or caring having they heard the story of "The boy who cried wolf"...oh wait not politically correct...."The Person who cried animal", not racially profiling wolves and including any human male female or other.....

2006-09-12 04:14:40 · 4 answers · asked by lost&confused 5

He refused to answer more questions that Ollie North! (Who, by the way, organized the delivery of most of the WMD's to the middle east, yet refused to cooperate with the U.S. government when he was made to testify).

Avoided questions and openly lied about everything except when Tim Russert cornered him on the Bush administration's lie about 9/11 and Iraq.

2006-09-12 04:12:44 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

We are fighting wars we cannot afford and borrow so much money from China that they could destroy the United States just by selling off their US holdings. The Economy is doing great if your apart of the ruling class but the rest of us peasants suffer. Establishing democracy in the middle east has only bred terrorists and supporters of terrorism to power. We are in a new nuclear arms race. The United States has no political capital to spend to fight those we should have fought from the beginning and Mr. Homland Security has yet to shut down the border to Mexico. Spain fired their president and got out of Iraq and have not been attacked since March 11th 2004. England has not and they have become a hub for terrorists. France, Germany, the Netherlands still terror free. I have heard you defend his moral character (despite he cheated to get into office) but his policies have failed and the world is going to hell in a hand basket. So what exactly makes him so great.

2006-09-12 04:08:15 · 29 answers · asked by curtaincaller 2

2006-09-12 04:07:31 · 10 answers · asked by Cara Arlene 5

He's done everything to ensure that bim laden thrives!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060910/pl_afp/usattacksqaeda_060910210027

2006-09-12 03:59:18 · 14 answers · asked by wjscottjones 1

Does John Howard think that by allowing immigrants into this country who require economic assistance he is reducing the standard of living for the rest of us, and by allowing negative gearing to continue he makes it harder and harder for new home buyers to buy housing due to the fact that investors are buying out all the houses and pushing prices out of reach of the average Australian. Does he realise do you think that he is doing this great country of ours longterm harm? Do you think he can see that he is decreasing the standard of living for the average Australian citizen and sending us down the path of the UK where the majority of people struggle to exist from day to day but where people such as himself live an easy life seemingly ignorant of the plight of people below him. Do you think he actually cares?

2006-09-12 03:53:56 · 7 answers · asked by The Amazing Anth 1

Climate changes have happened since the earth began.
Don't politicians (Al Gore - you know who you are) use this to scare uniformed people into voting for them?

2006-09-12 03:52:51 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

I personally don't find it attractive. To me it is nothing more than an animal carcass. If I saw a gorgeous girl wearing a coat previously owned by another creature, I would find her unattractive based on her represntation.
Sexy is wearing your own skin.

2006-09-12 03:52:06 · 9 answers · asked by Tony G 1

2006-09-12 03:47:51 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do they not know the difference between a small group of radical extremists and an entire religeon? Is this a by-product of one sided media coverage?

2006-09-12 03:42:00 · 23 answers · asked by londonhawk 4

Why haven't you carried out a large-scale invasion of places like Sudan, Somalia, Ethiopia, Rwanda or Liberia, where MILLIONS of innocents die year by year, thanks to a lack of democracy and to the outright disregard for human rights, unlike Iraq, where even women could attend college?

Is it perhaps because these countries do not have as much Texas Tea?

(and don't bring up the 'Black Hawk Down' thing, it was a UN mission, not US Army's or NATO's)

Before you think your army is being heroic, think again...it's the oil, baby!

2006-09-12 03:37:00 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous