English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

California's healthcare industry is raising rates with reckless abandon. Our level of healthcare, here in the San Joaquin Valley, is lower than many third world nations. Yet, our doctors live in mansions that would dwarf some of Saddam's palaces.
We're paying more in premiums and getting less in service and quality.
Yet, Arnold S. has declared "business as usual" and once again turned his back on California's working class.

I think we need to vote this bum out.

2006-09-12 04:51:33 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

5 answers

Arnold, like nearly all the others, was elected to maintain the status quo, and it is naivete to expect him to suggest policies that put people above profits, especially the profits of BIG insurance.

2006-09-12 05:07:46 · answer #1 · answered by peace m 5 · 1 0

The terminator bum needs an out and with someone from the green party. They're less corrupt. As an answerer to my question Paul K said, "Double Mint. Both the R and the D seem to attract the "extreme". I believe the answers are usually in the middle and I recognize the need for compromise. I also think it is important to know the person. When I vote, it is usually 1/4 R, 1/4 D, The remaining are Independent or left blank."

Go double mint go!

2006-09-12 04:54:58 · answer #2 · answered by Egroeg_Rorepme 4 · 1 0

while confronted with that query, Boehner defined that he by no ability mentioned each and all the fees may be open, in basic terms a number of them. (That became into an exceedingly strange explanation.) in spite of the undeniable fact that it is irrelevant. Pelosi made a similar promise. maximum new audio equipment make comparable claims. Then the time is composed of govern and that they locate them impractical. no person who will pay interest actual believed him. to boot, he does not have the votes interior the Senate to even get them to think approximately it and clearly the President might veto certainly one of those repeal besides. in the event that they tried to defund it, they might locate themselves with a dropping political conflict (no person needs an entitlement, as quickly as given, to be taken away) and with the regulation on the books, the investment may be restored later (in the event that they gain reducing it before everything) without the elect for the large debate we had the 1st time around. long-term, Obama gained the well-being-care combat. there is so plenty extra to do, this reform does not bypass almost a techniques adequate (and that i think of given the congress he became into working with, he would have carried out plenty extra effective), yet he made an considerable step interior the surprising direction that strikes the ball on the argument down the line.

2016-12-12 07:08:36 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Arnold desperately needs to understands our needs and wants for the Golden State. My cousin who lives in California was thinking about moving out of there because of the high cost of living. Why would he do something like that? I am no longer a strong supporter of the death penalty after he denied clemency on Stanley "Tookie" Williams. Like I said, Arnold needs to get his act together.

2006-09-12 04:59:52 · answer #4 · answered by aaron_esq 3 · 1 0

the grass isn't greener on the other side of the fence
health care benefits/costs are astronomical everywhere

2006-09-12 04:57:21 · answer #5 · answered by Mopar Muscle Gal 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers