OK people, time to stop saying "this website" debunks "that website" about 9/11?

Question

I see all these people posting that such and such website debunks theories about another such and such website. People don't seem to get that the "debunking" website just might be as biased in the other direction as the first website. Why believe one over the other? Just because it supports what you already believe?

I think what we need to do is look at both sides, weigh the arguments, and make our own conclusions. If you honestly have looked at both sides objectively and have concluded that the offical 9/11 commission report does tell what really happened, I applaud you for at least looking at both sides. But if someone hasn't ever considered the other side and have only looked at opposing facts with the mentality that it is wrong before even reading it, I can't really respect what he/she has to say.

I can completely understand people not thinking our government was behind it all, but to not concede that some things look fishy reeks of ignorant blissfullness.

I would also add that that doesn't mean we shouldn't give any of these sources any credibility or consideration, but rather to be careful and be selective as to what can be considered fact and what is merely speculation. That goes both ways, by the way. I happen to think the official 9/11 commission report is possibly the most biased source of any of them out there. After all, who has more incentive to twist things than our own government? Again, just be careful...

Answer 1

Amen!

Answer 2

You're quite right and I think anyone with an ounce of common sense and social responsibility should be willing to accept that there is something fishy going on...

Answer 3

you are right. anyone can create a website saying anything they want. i don't trust most of the links people post on here.