English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Government - August 2006

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Government

What changes would you make ?

if you want to see my changes, check my 360 blog.

2006-08-31 04:52:09 · 19 answers · asked by India 55 5

Why has it only required twenty-seven ammendments in over two hundred years?

2006-08-31 04:48:15 · 8 answers · asked by Meg 1

2006-08-31 04:38:50 · 2 answers · asked by Becca W 1

2006-08-31 04:08:16 · 12 answers · asked by lalchandxnc 1

2006-08-31 04:07:52 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

If it so bad as you say, then we should have people leaving in droves, in fact it's quite the opposite.

2006-08-31 03:36:34 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

( NGO : Non-Government organisations )

2006-08-31 03:23:28 · 2 answers · asked by STAN 1

These laws passed in 2005 in the House and Senate, but I was unaware of them until now. Did you know that the Federal government provides money to each state (keep in mind, this money comes from us, the US taxpayers) to keep a database on every prescription that we have filled?


Each pharmacy in the state enters our name, address, date of birth, and the prescription we take into the state's database. Doesn't matter whether you pay cash for your Rx, or have insurance, or have Medicare or Medicade. If you get a prescription filled, it's in the database.

Then there are companies out there that search these databases looking for private health information about us that they then give to (for example) insurance companies when we apply for insurance.

Does anyone else think that this "invasion of privacy" has just gone too far? I never even read about this and I keep fairly well informed of current events. I think this is ridiculous and would appreciate hearing your comments.

2006-08-31 03:20:07 · 4 answers · asked by kja63 7

Good or Bad???

What are your views on the extremely unpopular president?

2006-08-31 03:02:57 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

if u dont think americathen which country will take americas place?

2006-08-31 02:40:35 · 10 answers · asked by tom 1

Should Sadaam Hussein be assassinated??

2006-08-31 02:28:05 · 17 answers · asked by electralove88 4

2006-08-31 02:00:02 · 2 answers · asked by *Bella Reveuse* 3

This for US federal laws primarily.

2006-08-31 01:57:08 · 1 answers · asked by Ben broble 2

NOT a political question; I'm just curious since he's running the country...

2006-08-31 01:51:20 · 20 answers · asked by Grimm 4

I am the new world president...
elected by all countries in this world.

well,I did like bush....I have cheated during the election! but here I am ....

eheheheheh!

2006-08-31 01:37:11 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

A country with 38% illiterates, 53 % below poverty line, highest corrupted country (4th in the world), highest labour exploitation, highest sexual violence. Majority of the Indian politicians and planner thinking that Muslim presence is the major hurdle for progress.No policy oriented development. All is India. Last week a Russian diplomat forseen India would be next world power.

2006-08-31 01:35:18 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

For those who don't think so, please explain. I might give you the best answer status if your argument is convincing enough.

2006-08-31 01:34:49 · 2 answers · asked by OMB 1

2006-08-31 00:39:55 · 4 answers · asked by Renee E 1

Shadow Chancellor George Osborne will pledge that a Tory government would increase the proportion of "green" taxes.

He argues that the overall proportion of revenue derived from taxing activities that generate pollution has fallen under Labour from 7.7% in 1997 to 6.2% this year.

2006-08-31 00:18:08 · 10 answers · asked by stickyricky 3

what kind of assistance is out there to get me on my feet and provide a good, stable, comfortable life style for my 3 children that has never wanted for anything to adjusting to having nothing or noones but us 4?

2006-08-31 00:11:25 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous

which will directly cause hardship to the general population of the country, be considered an act of terrorism? Isn't that similar to blowing up planes and trains full of innocent people to get at Blair and Bush? and can we, as individuals worldwide impose sanctions by refusing to by products from countries condoning such sanctions?
BEFORE ANSWERING consider what sanctions, if brought against your country, would most effectively destablise its economy and ultimately who would suffer most. If it is your countries leaders please feel free to provide abusive answers.

2006-08-31 00:04:16 · 11 answers · asked by keepingitreal 2

Can u mention the country u are living in with ur answer.

2006-08-30 23:41:55 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think the present convergency USA-UK is excessive?

2006-08-30 23:28:22 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-08-30 23:24:47 · 26 answers · asked by kumar_ nk009 1

How to stop the human bomb? How we can fullfill the terrorist
needs?

2006-08-30 22:42:51 · 18 answers · asked by radha k 2

fedest.com, questions and answers