If sanctions are imposed against Iran,?

Question

which will directly cause hardship to the general population of the country, be considered an act of terrorism? Isn't that similar to blowing up planes and trains full of innocent people to get at Blair and Bush? and can we, as individuals worldwide impose sanctions by refusing to by products from countries condoning such sanctions?
BEFORE ANSWERING consider what sanctions, if brought against your country, would most effectively destablise its economy and ultimately who would suffer most. If it is your countries leaders please feel free to provide abusive answers.

Answer 1

i have said this from the first time u.s. went into Iraq, this will be seen as the u.s. forcing it's way on everyone else. the other Arab countries will start to question if they are next. they will all group together with anyone else that feels threatened (china, north Korea, etc.) and go after the u.s. any way they can. it has already started so don't call me a fool.

Answer 2

Iran has the ability to stop sanctions being imposed by running an open nuclear energy facility. No one is trying to prevent them having nuclear energy, if fact, several countries have offered to assist. Iran by continuing to pursue this course is leaving the UN with no options other than sanctions. Yes the people will suffer hardship but it would be nothing compared to the hardship that would be caused across the Middle East if they were allowed to continue.

Answer 3

No
Terrorism is performed by a MINORITY of individuals.
If sanctions were to be levied it would be a Majority (UN).

Yes sanctions are a very blunt instrument and many innocents feel it's dreadful effect however the alternative is much less desirable.

Many people can not trust Iran with Nuclear Enrichment. they feel they may supply Nuclear WMD to Militants groups or try and wipe Israel of the map with Nukes. Can you honestly say this is not the case? how many innocents then?

Answer 4

All Iran has to do is just listen and no sanctions will be imposed. In your comparison to acts of terrorism, if we could stop it we would but cannot! That is a very bad comparison. The ball is in Iran's court. Do you really believe this? What is wrong with this world!

Answer 5

I believe that one should practice what they preach. If the US and UK don't want Iran to produce nuclear fuel, then they should also stop producing nuclear fuel. The only country in the world that has ever used a NUCLEAR weapon is THE UNITED STAES OF AMERICA. They should be the ones that shouldn't have the right to have nuclear power as they have demonstrated that they are capable of using it. It like a paedophile should never be allowed to work with small children, as they have demonstrated that they are capable of child molestation. I think that NO ONE should be allowed to generate nuclear power.

Answer 6

I believe sanctions will increase the hate of this part of the world to the USA/UK/Israel. Why instead come up with a better idea: NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN THE MIDDLE EAST. That include the little poodle as well!

Answer 7

sanctions have been there for the past 27 years i doubt it will make much difference. Iran is one of the most civilised nations on the planet!!!

Answer 8

It would be interesting to know if you support the United Nations as sanctions would be authorised by them, thus representing WORLD condemnation. The comparisons in your question (statement/rant) are ill considered and wrong.

Answer 9

Hmm let me seee...earth calling planet MORON!

Good grief, Iran has nuclear capability and eventually it will have nuclear weapons, which no doubt they will sell to the highest bidder and contribute these weapons into the system of Terrorist cells in Iran,Iraq,Palestine and Saudi Arabia! Ask yourself this which is more important the needs of the few or the survival of the human race!!!!!!!!! Dumb *** If I had my way I would napalm the bastards..........

Answer 10

you talk like the idiot that would give his lunch money to the school bully instead of having a backbone and stand up for yourself.