Government - July 2006

Who would you rather see getting slapped with a wet tuna fish?

2006-07-27 22:35:35 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-27 22:29:51 · 15 answers · asked by alwayslookatmebaby 1

2006-07-27 22:29:11 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-27 22:27:47 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

Personally, I believe Bush has done an amount of good. He vetoed a bill that doen't give infants a chance to live. He brought democracy and order to Iraq. He chooses a plan and sticks to it.I don't know why people don't approve of him.

2006-07-27 21:59:02 · 17 answers · asked by some guy 3

2006-07-27 21:58:14 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-27 21:56:15 · 18 answers · asked by A True Gentleman 5

or if he needed any kind of help?

2006-07-27 21:49:35 · 19 answers · asked by alwayslookatmebaby 1

I heard they he had got rid of the CIA but George W. brought it back. Is this true?

2006-07-27 21:47:40 · 7 answers · asked by Nobody 2

2006-07-27 21:43:50 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-27 21:30:21 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous

Fun Facts: The US constitution is the oldest national democratic constitution in the world

so the question is after all the amendments and fun court battles and arguments of constitutionality with new laws.....do you think that the ultimate way to cut red tape (at least for a while) would be to update the constitution to be more current and applicable to the social and economic changes (globalization) that have taken place over the last 250 or so years?

2006-07-27 21:21:06 · 5 answers · asked by quetzacotl13_5 1

As a republican I just want to point out that we work in the general interest of Americans. We all want the freedom we are entitled to but when we have to send troops to Iraq, which makes it difficult on the families of these soldiers, liberals only seem to make the problem worse. They hold protests and complain thinking that there is a better way to protect America... I haven't heard any of these ways... have you? I just really feel that liberals are the problem for everything.

2006-07-27 20:25:57 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous

how many vote do we all have to say how bad he is really been like sending all our troop to the other side of the world and fighting and loseing there lives for his **** ups so how many people do we have to let him kill in our family so god bless im just wondering how many more than he is going to have killed

2006-07-27 20:11:03 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

George Bush goes to a primary school to talk to the kids to get a
little PR.

After his talk he offers question time. One little boy puts up his
hand and George asks him his name.

"Stanley," responds the little boy.

"And what is your question, Stanley?"

"I have 4 questions First, why did the USA invade Iraq without the
support of the UN? Second, why are you President when Al Gore got
more votes? Third, whatever happened to Osama Bin Laden?" Fourth,
why are we so worried about gay-marriage when 45 percent of all
Americans don't have health insurance?

Just then, the bell rings for recess. George Bush informs the kiddies
that
they will continue after recess.

When they resume George says, "OK, where were we? Oh, that's right,
question time. Who has a question?"

Another little boy puts up his hand. George points him out and asks
him his name.

"Steve," he responds. "And what is your question, Steve?"

"Actually, I have 6 questions First, why did the USA invade Iraq
without the support of the UN?

Second, why are you President when Al Gore got more votes?

Third, whatever happened to Osama Bin Laden?

Fourth, why are we so worried about gay marriage when 45 percent of
all Americans don't have health insurance?

Fifth, why did the recess bell go off 20 minutes early?

And sixth, what the hell happened to Stanley?"

2006-07-27 19:34:49 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-27 19:24:53 · 10 answers · asked by Tynesha J 1

they are forever fighting,with islamic country supporting their own race and western country supporting Israel.Each blaming each other for the problems!!

2006-07-27 19:13:44 · 10 answers · asked by fyc67 2

I'm just courious... i'm finally old enough to understand political discussions and not be bored. I've noticed that everyone says that the government is to blame...but don't we choose the government? so are we blaming ourselves? I just want to know what pple views and ideas are!

2006-07-27 19:08:36 · 14 answers · asked by *only~wishful~thinking* 3

What do you think about this?

http://www.infowars.com/articles/ps/bush_ignoring_our_laws_dobbs.htm

2006-07-27 18:58:49 · 7 answers · asked by Thai_Ice_Tea 1

I don't think it should be that way, what do you think?? I don't have alot of money nor does my family but i consider my family "high class" for other reasons.

2006-07-27 18:36:11 · 6 answers · asked by Kristi A 4

2006-07-27 18:33:43 · 9 answers · asked by salerarose12 1

I dont understand why americans complain so much about lossing jobs to other countries but will do nothing about it...run for office...march in washington...go protect your own border...technology has made the past few generations too lazy...they dont want to have to get out and defend what they want...why...do they not see that its not going to be handed to them...

2006-07-27 18:17:13 · 11 answers · asked by dink 2

2006-07-27 18:08:53 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

2006-07-27 17:54:23 · 13 answers · asked by darajay 2

What is this grand difference that makes the nobles more noble and me less fit??

2006-07-27 17:43:41 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous

What do you think about liberals?

2006-07-27 17:31:07 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

Toodle-pip, howdy partner! Lovely weather! Lots of reasons to point one's finger at Israeli's poking there poko-stick at the Arabs lately, but i'd like to hear how many think the culprit for the atrocities at present are the Americans, Brits, so on? Who are supplying th arms? Is it obvious that one should point the finger at the Brits for supplying arms for others to kill and mame, could there have been an alternative? Your opinion of course? I'd have prefered a political solution. I certainly know who the victims are and whom are the terrorists...

This link is of a graphic nature: http://www.halturnershow.com/IsraeliAtrocities.html

Yes, looks like everyday war, but are Mr. Blair- Mr. Bush behind the scenes?

2006-07-27 17:14:48 · 12 answers · asked by ABC 3

I keep hearing refrences to how England used to call our American patriots terrorists. OK, maybe they did but then those people mention that in the same breath as modern day terrorists, what a discrace to our forefathers. They are rolling in there graves thinking about that. There is no comparison as terrorism today is much different than back then. That was called guerilla warfare and I don't think General Washington ever strapped dynamite to a soldier and had him suicide bomb a civilian facility. People who say this should be discraced, anyone agree. I am open for criticism as well.

2006-07-27 17:08:17 · 14 answers · asked by ? 1

"Facism should more properly be called 'corporatism', since it is the marriage of government and corporate power". - Benito Mussolini. In consideration of the above quote by the founder of Facism and the ultimate power wielded by Corporations in the USA, should the form of government in that country be considered
Fascist? Take into consideration the inordinate power of corporate lobbyists to ensure the government does their will. For example, there is an obesity epidemic in our children, that is causing an early onset diabetes epidemic amongst them. Many of them will die prematurely, others will be blinded. It is widely known that the causes of this is the marketing of junk food and sugary soft drink to children. Surely the democratic will, if it had any power, would force the government to act, to save our children, but becasue of the power of the junk food and soft drink corporations, there is no action by the government, and hardly a word of protest is heard.

2006-07-27 17:01:36 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

come on people use your head the towers collapsed because they were made up of steel beams. When the planes hit they damaged the central beams, the weight of the towers was then distributed to the smaller outer steel beams which were warped by flames and by the tremendous weight. By thinking this was an inside job you are completely disrecting the lives of the rescue workers and all the innocent people who died that day

2006-07-27 16:47:35 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous