there is no 9/11 conspiracy?

Question

come on people use your head the towers collapsed because they were made up of steel beams. When the planes hit they damaged the central beams, the weight of the towers was then distributed to the smaller outer steel beams which were warped by flames and by the tremendous weight. By thinking this was an inside job you are completely disrecting the lives of the rescue workers and all the innocent people who died that day

Answer 1

I think doodoo is full of just that. The engineer who built the buildings was one of the people who helped figure out why they collapsed. And what picture of the hole with no fire and people in it? Put down the pipe and stop looking at doctored photos. No one in the impact areas survived. Please... What fireman reported that the fire was almost out when it collapsed? None of the firemen who went up to fight the fires made it out. What is your source? An Ouija board? An earlier post was right. The building used weaker materials to support the floors. The building did not collapse at "free fall" speed. Also, people's reference to other buildings that were hit with airplanes are partially correct. Those buildings were not hit by huge jetliners full of fuel. Add all the paper and flammable materials in the building and you have an incinerator, not just some normal fire. If the fire was out, why were people jumping to their death? This was a great tragedy no matter what the cause. Please don't try to trivialize it by making it a conspiracy joke...

Answer 2

The inside beams were made of steel the the surrounding structure was made of aluminum. Which was a choice made by the head engineer/designer, Minoru Yamasaki, to save money and for weight issues. When the aluminum melted (lower melting point than steel) and failed, the steel was left with the brunt of the weight. Also the second plane did sever a main support beam.

Answer 3

The towers were built to withstand 767 impacts. There's evidence of sulfur+thermite used to cut the steel, rather than warp/melt from plane fuel(which doesn't even get NEAR the temperature required to warp the steel in the towers). The official story is a conspiracy. Hell, even the FBI admitted at least 7 of the supposed hijackers are still alive. They only proved the IDs of those 19 men were stolen. Who framed them for the attacks? Who benefits from sticking 19 Saudis with the blame for all this bullsh!t?

Answer 4

Why don't you try to do a little research and gather a little more evidence than just that one mute point, the collapse. Besides 911 is the small picture. However many of the victims families are the ones who question what really happened on 911. The engineer of the building says it was impossible for the builing to collapse from steel melting, he even designed it to withstand a plane hitting it. The builing fell at freefall speed, which is conflicts with the pancake theroy. The steel "crime sceene" was imediately sold for scrap, which is illegal. Other buildings have burned for 2-4 days without collapsing. Fireman witness reports of blasts going off, sounding like demolition blasts.
Owner of builings ordered to "pull it" for builing number 7 which is a term meaning detonate in demolition. Video evidence of blasts going off down the side of the building. Fireman reports that the fire was almost out before builing collapsed. Pictures of alive people standing in hole where plane hit, no fire.

Answer 5

People who worked on the towers when they were being built can fill you in on the corners they cut to save money, including the insulation on the beams. That said, you are not disrespecting anyone who died there by saying it is a government conspiracy...because logically speaking they still died in a horrible terrorist attack no matter who did it. It is not as if they died for any cause, they simply were victims, nothing more, nothing honorable or heroic, amen, let the tragically dead remain so.

Answer 6

no one, even the commissioners themselves trust that the 9/11 fee replaced into honest. you could analyze that your self. also to reassure your self that a 757 hit the Pentagon, attempt to detect a video of that happening. -in case you've faith that none exists, then i guess you would trust something. So if one does exist, why are we no longer shown it? yet purely 5 frames showing a small fireball, and that fireball very a lot smaller than all of us understand occurs even as an total sized airplane slams right into a wall. i will see you've determined that you're going to do the proper you could to trust the reliable conspiracy theory, it is how i began off, i had to thoroughly discredit any theory that the Towers were demolished, and so on. yet regrettably, for my peace of options, i'm no longer extremely stupid sufficient.

Answer 7

There is a conspiricy
how do the towers just fall straight down like a controlled demolition
cmon think kenny think
Remeber in Spain a skyscraper was hit by an airplane
that building did not collapse
the steel structure stayed after more then 24 hours on fire and an aeroplane hitting it
so how do the buildings fall like that
they dont

Answer 8

When you say "disrecting" I'm assuming you mean disrespecting? I'm not sure...but I'm also unsure of how the cause of a disaster relates to the heroism of rescue workers, or the tragedy of those who died. What does the cause have to do with that?

I'm trying to use my head...but I still don't understand the correlation.

Answer 9

It is in no way disrespectful to question the way those people died, and you can't be 100% sure that there was no coverup. I'm not saying I agree with any of the theories out there, but I do still have some questions, and I don't believe the government is telling us the truth about a lot of things.

Answer 10

You know what was interesting about the event's of 9/11? They taught us in school science class about the domino affect that will happen if a building caught fire of started to collapse in just the right area.

9/11 was defiantly a terrorist doing.