Yes, the young liberals have no brains (and according to some of the answers, can't spell, either). They believe in propoganda and form their opinions based on lies.
The old ones? Well, they are the ones that lost alot of brain cells from all the dope they did at their political rallies and protests in the '70s.
2006-07-27 17:42:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by coco 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
lol coco and some others. I think there is a few flaws in their idiology for sure. And it seems the only way they can try to sneek their way to power is by yelling screaming hatred at Bush and Co.The liberals of today are heading the now Democrat party, they seem to have no positive plan for anything. And their ideas on the war on terrorism scares the hell out of me. But sadly I don't see the so- called conservative party of today being conservative. The only reason I will keep voting republican for now is the war on terror...and the tax cuts....
2006-07-27 18:00:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by crusinthru 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Old have no heart? Explain that one to me because the old ones are the only ones that can remember what the party is really all about. No brain, I can agree with that. That's why the parties are the same, STUPIDITY.
2006-07-27 17:34:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Who cares 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
it somewhat relies upon now... many conservators are somewhat ideological socially and characteristic no clue of reality... they imagine that childrens merely "do not have sex" and that is all there is to assert about that... and that persons merely "should not be gay" there'll be a operating communist equipment lengthy previously childrens merely "don't have sex"... that a lot i will promise you... even if the international is transforming into further and further liberal... and regular, i imagine a significantly better position to stay... i will't imagine of a time at the same time as it is been better liberal... or of a significantly better time to stay... at one time human beings like MLK were considered "liberal idealist" on the concept-about racial equality... "that ought to under no circumstances happen and it is only a dream"... conservatives stated... and definitely he did have a dream... and that i imagine we are closer now than we ever were... no longer there yet even if, yet getting there... regular, i imagine the "liberal idealist" knocks are somewhat no longer something better than propaganda... as idealist and dreamers are all to many times the heros that we glance lower back on... and conservatives are all to many times the relative villains of historic past... merely study some historic past regular in case you do not trust me...
2016-11-26 20:09:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by svatos 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You pretty much hit it......
Oh, and be prepared to be verbally beaten for making that statement!! lol
2006-07-27 17:34:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Katz 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are not interested in the truth. They believe in lies and half truths.
2006-07-27 17:34:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think your statement is judge mental and uneducated.
typical...
2006-07-27 17:35:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Krn 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
moronic abuse reported
2006-07-27 17:37:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
they just want to have a voice, in all the wrong way.........I agree with what you say!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-07-27 18:20:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by kathy<!-- 3
·
0⤊
0⤋