English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Elections - November 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Elections

Tomorrow Australia votes for a new
Government and Prime Minister -will
Howard get back in or will the Public
vote against War?

2007-11-22 09:03:48 · 8 answers · asked by Sandy 2

Ok here's another dumb question of mine that will annoy people but then I am a british citizen so be nice. . .
I thought that Hilary and Obama were campaigning for presidency from different parties i.e republican and democrat, but they are both democrat, are they not? So what is it they are campaigning against each other for? Are they fighting for leadership of the democrat party? I'm so dumb I really need to educate myself on basic things like this but the internet hasn't been that helpful, will someone explain?

2007-11-22 08:54:51 · 8 answers · asked by TroutSniff 3

From all the Candidates which ones actually answer the questions and not just dodge around the questions?

2007-11-22 08:43:02 · 7 answers · asked by Don't Know 5

Why do some people even bother voting for a candidate who has so much baggage?

2007-11-22 08:37:09 · 5 answers · asked by Don't Know 5

Which Presidential Candidate has be the most baggage?
Thanks

2007-11-22 08:16:23 · 11 answers · asked by Don't Know 5

She flip flopped 3 times on the drivers license issues in the debate.

2007-11-22 08:11:38 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do you think she was really in on the scam? Or do you believe she knew "narsink" *best German accent*

2007-11-22 07:44:42 · 4 answers · asked by kelstar 5

Cause the boogieman is going to get us? Hey thanks for the heads up right before you jump the sinking ship!

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/11/20/townsend-attack-election/

Oh boy, it would be so convenient for him to do so since he did in fact sign PD51 to make himself der Führer.

That would be for our safety of course.

2007-11-22 05:26:11 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Seeing that politicians will do almost anything to get elected including lying, cheating, stealing, backstabbing, blackmailing, etc... & then once elected they'll do all the same things to stay in office are Americans who vote really smarter/better than those Americans who actually know the true nature of politicians and don't vote?

2007-11-22 04:54:00 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous

the House yesterday said President Clinton failed to act in "the national interest" earlier this year when he gave permission for a Chinese satellite launch to a U.S. aerospace firm with close Democratic ties, and moved to block him from approving similar exports.
But yesterday's House votes, all on amendments to the annual defense authorization bill, made plain that Democrats, too, have concerns. By 364 to 54, lawmakers adopted Rep. Duncan Hunter's (R-Calif.) proposal for a flat ban on the export or re-export of satellites to China.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...

Why would some Liberals also vote to do this? Why are some liberals supporting Rep Duncan Hunter proposal anyway?
How will this move effect us now and why is not highly advertised? How come Duncan Hunter is not getting enough
media attention since he appears to be looking after Americas best interest?

2007-11-22 04:31:55 · 2 answers · asked by Don't Know 5

I know the answer but I think almost every so called republican on YA just dont know. SO answer to the best of your ability and I will come back later and give you the answer

2007-11-22 04:00:15 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous

I dont, and will probably stay home. the democrats clearly do not have the balls to do what they were voted in to do: End the war...it's simple, STOP FUNDING IT

2007-11-22 03:25:24 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous

personally I think woman are just as good as guys so Im all for it. For over 50 years men as ruled pretty much every presidentry and I think its time somthing changed. I also think it would be good for the economy as a woman would have alot different views than men.

*** also do you think its right for another canidate to play the " woman card" to get people to not vote for them?

2007-11-22 03:05:09 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous

Which GOP Candidate is fox bias against?

2007-11-22 02:54:56 · 7 answers · asked by Don't Know 5

a.bandwagon
b.endorsement
c.name-calling
d.reverse

Can someone please help me

2007-11-22 02:44:59 · 6 answers · asked by sexy1lilmo 1

Say that the election is between Mike Huckabee and Barack Obama (unlikely I know). Who would you vote for?

2007-11-22 02:38:29 · 17 answers · asked by Super Tuesday 3

We all know the media is in a frenzy over a "Camelot" political entity; we've seen how they turned an Irish gangster family who produced a slew of drunks, rapists, drug addicts, adulterers, bums and truly worthless crew of white trash, into political "rock stars".

The Clintons played the media's weakness to portray a "Hill-Billy Camelot", to get political strength and con people.

How many women who are highly educated, highly intelligent, emotionally independant, extreme feminist, highly successful- would allow their spouse to very publicly maintain a prolific sexual life, outside the marriage? Bill has had dozens and dozens of affairs, trysts, gropes, one nighters, flings, etc.... who would believe sHrillery would maintain a physical relationship with Billy?

We all know the real answer, she wouldn't "Lewinsky" Bill if he was wrapped in 10 condoms and was checked for STD's by a dozen doctors.

You can't say, it's their personal business BECAUSE THEY PROMOTE THE LIE.

2007-11-22 01:01:41 · 6 answers · asked by ? 7

If Clinton wins the primary and becomes the offical democratic candidate for the popular election is it possible for Obama to become her running mate? If so is this a good idea?

2007-11-22 00:40:12 · 12 answers · asked by JustWondering 2

...on the ballot, and by the filthy first-past-the-post voting system?

2007-11-21 23:56:16 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-21 23:39:22 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous

Put your hand up here now if you want to see Kevin Rudd take us into a better future.
visit http://www.kevin07.com.au
and see what he will be doing to make our lives better.

ps, if you are voting liberal, don't answer this question, you are voting to condemn australian families to a devistating future.

2007-11-21 22:58:39 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous

since they controlled the computers and the servers that totaled all the votes can we then sue them for all the damage Bush did since then?

Why not?

They caused all this mess, why not have a class action law suit against the republicans once they are proven to have stolen that election?

2007-11-21 22:24:19 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

I have no idea how the Newspolls know what the people will vote on election day, unless we all, or a huge majority of us have voted in polls? How do they gather this information! If there were so many undecided people, how could they tell who we will vote for? Thank guys

2007-11-21 21:54:24 · 6 answers · asked by Jamie C 1

2007-11-21 21:37:06 · 5 answers · asked by Thomas L 3

It is IMPOSSIBLE for America to forget the republicans the see in the White House and in D.C. now. Bush is not the only crook who calls himself a republican. Yes, the democrats are too inept. Republicans are cunning and deceiving. They cannot be trusted!! The only republican that got my attention was Huckabee. He looks innoncent. He even said he was not pro illegal but did not want illegals children to suffer. I too want them to receive some form of help. However, he ( in classical republican style) did not mention that he wanted the college tuition for illegals waived.

If he wants to educate illegals and not give an American student a dime, guess who will continue to become gainfully employed? Millions of smart high school students cannot afford college. They take a course here or there on the community level. This is why a republican can NEVER be trusted. It is best to vote independent. Romney is in a cult. Giuliani is low key mafia. Obama has my vote; he is the man!

2007-11-21 19:39:01 · 6 answers · asked by shawnLacey 4

Based on the 2004 election, the Coalition has 19 of the 36 Senators who are not up for election on Saturday -- 4 in Queensland, 3 in New South Wales, 3 in Western Australia, 3 in Tasmania, 3 in South Australia, and 3 in Victoria. The ALP has 14 -- 3 in New South Wales, 3 in South Australia, and 2 each in Queensland, Tasmania, Western Australia, and Victoria. The Greens have 2 -- 1 each in Tasmania and Western Australia -- and Family First has 1 -- in Victoria.

To keep its majority, the Coaltion needs 20 of the 40 Senators up for election. The easiest way for the Coaltion to get 20 is to get 3 from each of the states (for a total of 18) and 1 from each of the territories. The question is whether you think the Coaltion can accomplish this goal? If you think they are going to fall short, in which state (or states) do you think the Coaltion will fail to get 3 Senators or in which territory (or territories) will the Coaltion fail to get a Senator?

2007-11-21 19:22:48 · 4 answers · asked by Tmess2 7

fedest.com, questions and answers