Why do some people even bother voting for a candidate who has so much baggage?
2007-11-22 08:37:09 · 5 answers · asked by Don't Know 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I dont know. Ask the Hillary Clinton supporters, they have experience.
2007-11-22 08:42:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sometimes people vote for a candidate that you see as having a lot of baggage because they don't think the candidate actually has as much baggage as you do. It's difficult to know exactly what you mean when you say "baggage" because some people may not consider what you think is baggage to be baggage at all. I think it might have been better if you had been a little more specific with your question.
Other people vote for Candidate A because they'd rather it be them than Candidate B.
Other people don't care how much baggage a candidate has. Simple as that.
2007-11-22 18:40:17 · answer #2 · answered by remove 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It comes down to the point where what's more important...experience or baggage?I really don't know.
Hillary Clinton has some huge baggage,but she has great experience.
Obama has virtually no experience, and with it, very little baggage.
My question is, why can't we vote for someone who could really get the job done like Kuncinich or Ron Paul? I'd vote for either of them. I like their blunt honesty and I think they could really make a difference.
2007-11-22 16:45:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Vote for the most qualified of all the candidates, the one with the least baggage.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.
2007-11-22 16:45:50 · answer #4 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
everyone has baggage. some people just hide it better.
2007-11-22 16:46:48 · answer #5 · answered by SavetheEmu 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋