English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Elections - November 2007

[Selected]: All categories Politics & Government Elections

Okay we are drawing close to election time, so who is going to win and really choose who you think will win, and don't get so snide. Just put the name and at the end we can tally up who will win. I thnk it's going to be Mrs. Clinton! What about you guys? WHO WILL WIN THE ELECTION FOR THE NEXT PREZ? MRS. C. MITT ROMEY, OBAMA OR MICKEY MOUSE?

2007-11-23 16:02:07 · 18 answers · asked by Beatrice Z 1

who did you vote for?

2007-11-23 14:59:33 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Everytime I hear people not voting for someone because he/she doesnt have a chance i get infuriated. It doesnt make any sense! Vote for who has the best politics, not those who have a "better" chance!!

2007-11-23 12:36:54 · 9 answers · asked by qwertyman 3

On this calculator I got Barack Obama at 91.30%.

Who did you get.

2007-11-23 12:11:39 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

The wife of former French President Jacques Chirac has endorced Hillary Clinton for President of the US.

Meanwhile Jacques Chirac is under formal investigation for suspected embezzlement during his 1977-1995 tenure as Paris mayor.

http://www.voanews.com/english/2007-11-2...

Does the term, "Birds of a feather flock together" seem appropriate here?

2007-11-23 10:51:22 · 8 answers · asked by T-Bone 7

I have been researching where they stand on Envir. issues such as Air Quality and safer drinking waters, protection of wildlife and Our waterways... I am looking for a Leader who wants to improve things today , not 2050....We are all ready for a Healthier Planet today....So who will Help Lead us there in your opinion.....I know we the voters, and the consumers should make sure we make the best choices on who we vote for and what we buy......

2007-11-23 10:51:11 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous

Hillary. Supports say for her, "Well all politicians lie." "Well most politicians are funded by lobbyists." "Well some politicians flipflop."

Do you not understand that the status quo of politics is NOT working? And not just because of the Bush administration. We've had problems of the elected officials ignoring the people long before. They do what ever they can to be reelected. They take money from lobbyists and are bound by them.

We don't have time to go through another 4 years of this.

We need a candidate who is against lobbyists. Who is for uniting our country, the left and right. The problem with Hillary and Romney is that most people are basically in the middle of political standing. Hillary is too left. Romney is too right.

If you don't realize the hell that this country is going through, then vote for Hillary. You DESERVE her. But if you see the things that I see, take a look at other candidates. Candidates who offer a change is how we perceive politics.

OBAMA '08!

2007-11-23 10:49:02 · 18 answers · asked by Blake 3

One can disagree with Austrian-born Republican Governor Schwarzenegger or Canadian-born Democratic Governor Granholm on policy issues, or question their qualifications, but honestly - purely on the basis of their patriotic loyalty to the U.S.A., does anyone think that these two people shouldn't be allowed to run for president? I'm fairly sure that neither of them is a "sleeper agent" for their country of birth. Ditto for Henry Kissinger and Madeline Albright.

We need the very best we've got for our next (several) presidents; why are we hanging onto a rule that excludes some of our most qualified prospects?

2007-11-23 10:33:11 · 23 answers · asked by edthespartan 6

In Australia every citizen is required to vote so populist policies and personalities can and do effect the outcome of elections.
Very few Labor, Liberal or whatever voters have any say in the selection of their party candidate. That is done by party members.
Since the candidate will represent a faction within the Party a dozen or less people actually decide the outcome in an electorate.
How democratic is that?
Many of us would be better off not voting at all. That means leaving the ballot blank.
Better to stay at home and risk a fine!!

2007-11-23 09:37:37 · 11 answers · asked by Gary K 3

How come we don't see Ron Paul granting more interviews with African-Americans and Latinos?

The link below shows my exclusive rare interview with Congressman Ron Paul:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjJThkuaNBw

2007-11-23 07:56:14 · 9 answers · asked by AlbertHoward.org 2

it's based on the Clinton's first campaign history. They've changed the names to avoid law suits.
John Travolta plays Bill
Emma Thompson plays Hillary

The Vince Foster suicide is represented by the suicide of a woman instead to avoid the wrath of the Clinton's. There is a book by the same name, check it out it's even more detailed than the movie.

2007-11-23 07:55:51 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAwvlDJgJbM

This video is crucial. This is a presidential candidate explaining to the CHAIRMAN OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE why all prices are so high, and why everybody is losing a ton of money.

He's explaining the inflation tax.

Listen to the fear and nervousness in the chairman of the Feds voice!!!

This is scary as hell! It's your money! It's your savings!

It is being devalued like crazy.

Ron is the only candidate who wants to scrap the Fed or force them back to the gold standard where they must have gold backing the money!

If you are going for anybody else, welcome great depression.

Look, the bottom line is, despite wars, programs, incentives and issues, MONEY makes the world go round. If your dollars value is shot, then we are all in the poor house. The dollar is incredibly weak to the Euro now.

We are going down without Ron Paul! I'm dead serious. He's a genius in economics.

2007-11-23 07:35:37 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

i have to write a paper on why and i really dont care so just tell me why you would

2007-11-23 07:23:49 · 9 answers · asked by PRiNCESS 1

http://www.enewsreference.com

2007-11-23 07:22:06 · 5 answers · asked by internet browser 4

Bill Clinton
George Bush
Hillary Clinton
Jeb Bush


lol,
I DO NOT want Hillary or Jeb..but anyone think this is a possibility?

2007-11-23 07:01:57 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-11-23 06:41:56 · 20 answers · asked by Naturescent 4

i cant find it???

2007-11-23 06:31:21 · 5 answers · asked by Jules 2

Do you think Obama lost votes when he made it clear he wanted illegal immigrants to have a drivers license?
I'm an Obama fan,and I'm still supporting him on this.
I also agree with him on this issue because of Public Safety.
What do you think?

2007-11-23 06:30:51 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

If there are no healthy workers left in America you will have no choice but to hire illegal aliens and buy everything from Wal-Mart.

Do you really want to see your country in that sad of shape?

What happens when there is no middle class?

What side of the line will you fall on when all we have is super-rich people who live for hundreds of years and poverty-stricken drug-addicted people that walk the streets like zombies?

If you look around, you can already see it happening in the major cities...

(Yes, it's an exaggeration, but it might only be another 10 years away at this rate...)

2007-11-23 06:02:00 · 7 answers · asked by rabble rouser 6

what can Barak Obama do to obtain the necessary votes to win the election ?

2007-11-23 05:27:26 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

seems like they don't really need anything, they're set for life and they know it.

why not only let the poor vote who they think might improve their lives?

2007-11-23 05:25:34 · 13 answers · asked by Jennifer 2

I think so.
Edwards will soon endorse Obama, and Obama will win the nomination and presidency. IMO

2007-11-23 05:22:37 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

My question was, Will Hukabee, consistent with his core beliefs, advocate as a candidate and enact into law if he is elected, a law criminalizing extra maratal sex?

Is there something mysterious about that question?…All the answers I got did not touch on it in anyway. . I assume that his ardent supporters would have some idea that they were willing to share.

2007-11-23 05:01:20 · 7 answers · asked by sSuper critic 2

I want to hear from both sides, and why. How do you feel about the Catholic church telling its followers what type of presidential candidate to vote for? Or in some cases, which one candidate to vote for? Isn't that a violation of mixing church and state affairs? Wouldn't then (theoretically) the Catholic church be able to "sponsor" a strongly Catholic candidate, and tell its followers to vote for him? I want to make something clear, I am a Protestant, or at least that's what I have been labeled by the Catholic church, and I have no hate against Catholics, everyone is entitled to their own beliefs. My "religion" isn't perfect, but we cannot judge a religion by its members, we judge it by its beliefs. If we didn't, Catholicism would be just as taboo as Nazism. Hitler professed to be Catholic, remember? But all in all, do you think it's right for the church to do so or not?

2007-11-23 04:42:38 · 26 answers · asked by evangelion 4

2007-11-23 04:40:34 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

I'm Praying For A Hillary Or Obama Win. Just Wondering About You Guys.

2007-11-23 04:21:34 · 23 answers · asked by Mr Green Eyez 1

They've added Obama...

2007-11-23 03:58:18 · 7 answers · asked by Daewen 3

I don't mean those genuinely on benefits due to disability or illness, but the long-term unemployed who simply do not want to work. Should they be denied the vote? If they are not contributing to society, then why should they be given a say in how society is run?

2007-11-23 03:35:02 · 56 answers · asked by slıɐuǝoʇ 6

fedest.com, questions and answers