I have to add my 2 cents worth in on this one. Today I ran a crossed several articles. It started with I seen the Russian Air Force is to receive six upgraded Su-24 bombers.
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20071121/88991044.html
and Iran saying it can fend off a U.S. attack.
http://en.rian.ru/world/20071122/89181289.html
To top it off Israel speaks for new sanctions against Iran and as we all should know, The U.S is a large supporter of Israel. Your question takes some thinking. Today I watched the Paul Bremer clip
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/205.html
that was filmed 8hrs after the attacks of 9-11 and how he was suggesting that OBL was to blame (weird) Did he know something we didn't? So that makes me think that someone knew or of a false flagging operation.
Now China stops the Carrier "Kitty Hawk" from entering it's port for the first time since the Vietnam War. So here we have 3 nations that are having concerns with U.S decision makers. If any false flagging would happen AND/OR the U.S goes to attack yet another nation, I do feel martial law could be placed. Bush stated recently that Musharaff hasn't crossed the line, so it makes me feel as he is using him as a role model - because he might also do the same thing. This would pause the elections...Scary
2007-11-22 13:30:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by done 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Bush has no intention of going anywhere
It is my belief a large false flag operation will be staged by the US government or factions within it
This will likely be nuclear - sufficient in the minds of neo cons to declare an emergency Under Pres Order 51 signed into law a year ago the devolution of authority is Homeland security's job" at the direction of the President Hmmm think on that for a bit
It will be said that the Congress who did not give Bush the money to protect the US is responsible for the Pentagon having to go to a skeleton crew (the Pentagon has already said this ) in the US and that the Congress made the US vulnerable
No one will think--- Hey Pentagon - instead of limiting operations at home limit them in Europe or Iraq or bring home the very expensive 5th fleet but do not leave the "homeland" vulnerable This is all bad planning and politics on the part of the Pentagon - and therefore the Pentagon not the Congress is to blame for leaving the US vulnerable
No no that will not be said at all
As it will turn out Alquiada will attack with nuclear weapons given to them by Iran - Even though the international scientists all said that Iran is a decade away from a bomb - No one will mention that and if they do then Alquada stole them from Pakistan as a capper pulled off by Bin Laden
Nonetheless here is the message Bush wants you to have
Attacked because liberals and Congress would not give money on demand - Liberals are therefore the enemy
Attacked because you did not listen to me
Now we need emergency rule which more or less makes Congress a shadow of itself with literally no budgetary or legislative powers under Pres Order 51 -----but keep in mind how they betrayed you when they had that power any way will be the secondary message
Bush will step down when it is possible - when America is safe and Iran is dead -
An invasion likely a nuclear bomb will be dropped on Iran
Bush is going to gamble that Russia and China won't do anything - Wow because if he is wrong we all might die in the war Bush caused for no real reason at all and it will all be a set up for world domination
And here is the best
All of this is just around the corner
2007-11-22 05:45:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Napolitano looks like Fred Gwinn, who played Herman Munster, in drag. That is one scary looking woman. How do the democrats manage to find these bull dykes? Janet Reno, now this . . .
2016-05-25 00:48:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by darlene 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You know most of the answers will probably be telling you to "put on your tinfoil hat" or something similar. I'm not surprised considering how strikingly similar his directives (like the one giving him power to declare a vaguely defined state of emergency and suspend the Constitution) compare to the acts of someone else in history.
2007-11-22 05:47:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by jerseygyrrl 3
·
6⤊
0⤋
it wouldnt surprise me:tyranny in the white house has been going on forever./ the characters have changed and evil is gaining momentum.thecolonialization and federal regionalism,for globalization in approx.2012 is on course.cush senior with the jewish templars are bizzy working on their plan to change world currency. something could happen to the american stock exchange that could change our world??
2007-11-22 06:19:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by forsonclan03@yahoo.com 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
Smarty, that is the saddest thing I have read today. Yes, the possibility is there.
Happy Thanksgiving)
Edit: lol...nope U didn't. I am used to it.
2007-11-22 05:31:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Choco 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
http://www.alternet.org/rights/68399/
Sorry, still reading it. It's morbidly fascinating, and concise.
2007-11-22 05:53:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Not going to happen but even after the elections come and go, people like you will continue to make idiotic claims anyway.
2007-11-22 05:36:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
8⤋