The following in no way represents my true beliefs. Okay, well, it does, but just in case the FBI break down my door after I post this, I can say that it was all purely hypothetical.
I suggest that the death penalty is wrong only because death is actually *too good* for those convicted of first degree murder. Hell, this might apply even to second degree murder. I'm thinking about it. First degree murder implies an intent to kill, and second degree murder implies that death resulted from an assault intended to harm.
What if, instead of simply being imprisoned, murderers were actually tortured? Killers, you see, often don't fear death, which is why statistics show that the death penalty has no effect as a deterrent. Many murderers actually desire death. Therefore, I suggest that murderers be subjected to agony that they didn't know they were afraid of. This is, of course, not realistic. It is unquestionably barbaric and generally not PC.
-continued-
2007-12-01
20:55:08
·
12 answers
·
asked by
He Who Defied Fate [Atheati]
3
in
Law & Ethics