Politics & Government - 29 October 2006

According to N.D.kapoor

2006-10-29 00:36:31 · 1 answers · asked by sandeepa s 1 in Law & Ethics

defend...or against it

2006-10-29 00:32:00 · 7 answers · asked by thana 1 in Law & Ethics

2006-10-29 00:31:38 · 12 answers · asked by CurlyQ 4 in Immigration

And do you think this current president understands the meaning of such a profound statement.

2006-10-29 00:24:38 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

And that the U.S. has lost 60% of its manufacturing base? And that McDonalds has been the creator of the most new jobs? Do you know that if we use the REAL statistics to calculate unemployment (the way we used to in 1980), the actual U.S. unemployment rate IS 12.5%? Washington's NEW WAY of calculating unemployment rates doesn't include workers who can't find jobs. After 6 months of searching, those unemployed job seekers just fall off the books. So far, about 5,000,000 workers have earned this "invisible" status. So, when Washington tells you how GREAT things are, do you believe them?

2006-10-29 00:23:33 · 19 answers · asked by In Honor of Moja 4 in Other - Politics & Government

2006-10-29 00:23:22 · 8 answers · asked by crystali 1 in Law Enforcement & Police

Iran is an Islamic state so-to-say:
Why are so many political sites filtered in Iran while hard core porn sites are allowed? (example iranian.com vs pornspinner.com)
Why can't Iranians even submit a technical article on digg.com?
What is the regime hiding from people of Iran and why newspapers are censored, closed and people imprisoned for expressing their views?
True Islam leaves people free to choose then who is this regime serving? Quran or Satan?

2006-10-29 00:21:51 · 7 answers · asked by Pishisauraus 3 in Other - Politics & Government

i think there has only been one prosecution for this offence although its happening all the time, surely the police must be turning a blind eye, is this the case of one law for the rich and one for the poor

2006-10-29 00:19:39 · 5 answers · asked by JOHN jen 4 in Law Enforcement & Police

it's in divorce procedings

2006-10-29 00:19:23 · 1 answers · asked by Stephen G 1 in Law & Ethics

In the dictionary it says Murder is killing someone at Law's eye of what is murder and what is crime. Assassination is murder that is thought throughout and that is sever. In the past assassinations to presidents have been less grusome than those of a normal everyday person. Why is a bullet through the heart or knife for a long-shot more grusome than someone beeing shot twenty times, or burned to death, or to have their skull crushed and brains everywhere? Shouldn't the normal everyday person be assassinated and the political figure be murdered?

2006-10-29 00:19:17 · 6 answers · asked by Cindy Z 1 in Other - Politics & Government

Do you think court proceedures and the high cost of going to trial, nas made it nearly impossible to get a fair outcome to cases?

2006-10-29 00:14:55 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Law & Ethics

Do you think court proceedures and the high cost of going to trial, nas made it nearly impossible to get a fair outcome to cases?

2006-10-29 00:14:03 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Other - Politics & Government

2006-10-29 00:11:21 · 9 answers · asked by polly 1 in Law & Ethics

Without the power of arrest do they really make a difference?

2006-10-29 00:08:09 · 27 answers · asked by whospiltmypint 2 in Law Enforcement & Police

2006-10-29 00:07:07 · 10 answers · asked by j 1 in Military

Liberal Democrats have been portrayed by Republicans as overly guilt-feeling pessimists, worry warts, and negativists. It occurs to me, especially after reading many of the comments on yahoo answers, that I have never seen any signs of guilt-feelings, remorse or second thoughts among Conservative Republicans. If you can describe their P.R. front in a phrase, it would be "gung ho."

Why is this? If you are a Conservative Republican, do you think guilt is unproductive? A waste of time? Needlessly negative? You don't like feeling bad, and so, refuse to go there?

I would counter this sort of rebuff of Liberal guilt by saying that feeling guilt or remorse forces you to do the right thing. THAT is it's real value to society and the individual. If Bush felt badly enough about all the Americans who've died in Iraq, he might do something about it. But he has steeled himself, and can admit no guilt or remorse into his world.

Many party followers apparently follow his model.

Why is this?

2006-10-29 00:03:57 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics

2006-10-29 00:03:57 · 17 answers · asked by JIVE TURKEY 2 in Politics