English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you think court proceedures and the high cost of going to trial, nas made it nearly impossible to get a fair outcome to cases?

2006-10-29 00:14:55 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

5 answers

yes we all do not habe the funding that OJ and Bobby Blake have, the FBI estimates that 15% of all people in prison today which would mean 250,000 people are wrongfully convicted! In America people are punished byu exercising their constitutional rights to a trial by being given the maximum sentence when going to trial as opposed to a deal, which causes many to plead guilty to a crime they didn't commit.

2006-10-29 02:53:10 · answer #1 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 1 0

The excellent courtroom has determined that it's not cruel or unusual.. Blacks commit a proportionately far more effective type of crimes than white. ALL accused of homicide are entitled to a Public Defender at no fee. it really is egalitarian. fee isn't the problem. the problem is justice. Are you saying that the lives of those murdered must be bartered for at a good purchase fee? it really is both authentic the in charge everyone is released, and far more effective typically through criminal technicalities and prosecutorial ineptitude. Capital punishment isn't about deterrence. it really is society's frame of mind to preserving persons acccountable for his or her crimes and punishing them. Your opinion that capital punishment might want to be"rejected in all situations" is in basic terms that, an opinion. BTW: Why not ask this question in pink China or Russia, the position the rigors are quick, and the convicts get a bullet contained in the decrease back of the top? Your FLAG is exhibiting. Edit: I hear the favourite libbie emotional hand wringing, rationalization, and opinion. enable someone you comprehend be raped and murdered by technique of the likes of someone which incorporates Lovelle Mixon and also you'll sing a distinct track. humorous the way you so cavalierly disregarded the mass homicide of tens of millions by technique of your commie leaders. You forgot that murdering thug Castro. and is not it a twin of a libbie to wish to DO THE CRIME yet not want to DO THE TIME. not executing murderers is a left surpassed way of condoning homicide. If that is the commie way, save IT.

2016-12-05 08:21:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sometimes, even though technically the burden of proof is supposed to be on the accuser. That certainly isn't the reality of some criminal trials, unfortunately.

2006-10-29 00:20:05 · answer #3 · answered by Zombie 7 · 0 0

I believe wealth is a determining factor in our legal system, but this has always been the case.

2006-10-29 00:18:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Justice is biased toward the rich.

2006-10-29 00:22:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers