English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Current Events - March 2007

[Selected]: All categories News & Events Current Events

2007-03-13 06:30:27 · 6 answers · asked by granny_sp 4

If they think this is supporting the Nuclear Polifaration treaty. good luck to them. They wont get my vote.

2007-03-13 06:29:20 · 9 answers · asked by donald3743 1

I've seen a few questions asking about people being upset about Haliburton's move to Dubai. I don't understand why this upsets people. Why would you be okay with Frampton up until now, but be upset about where they locate their headquarters? Haliburton has been a "big evil" corporation for decades, and has profited off of war and the suffering of others for just as long. Who cares where they do business from--they're equally as evil here in the U.S. as they will be in Dubai. Theoretically, I suppose, it might mean less taxes paid to the U.S. government, but I doubt it's very much less, as they will continue to do business here, and I'm sure they get out of most of the taxes they're supposed to pay anyway. And, again, pay or not paying taxes shouldn't alter your fundamental opinion of their business purpose and practices. So, tell me, why are some of you suddenly upset now?

2007-03-13 06:20:07 · 2 answers · asked by Qwyrx 6

firing of those Department of Justice Prosecutors!!!!!!!

What further damages will Bush do before he is ousted?

2007-03-13 06:09:26 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous

Trying to eradicate AIDS in Africa?
For as long as the Pope doesn't allow condoms many Africans won't entertain the idea of using a condom. And even then it would probably an assault on the average African male ego to put a bit of plastic over their manhood.

It was the 'Red' campaign that got me wondering. Your thoughts?

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/article2341310.ece
http://www.joinred.com/

2007-03-13 05:17:14 · 11 answers · asked by Part Time Cynic 7

its so easily done so how come there hasnt been troublemakers just deleting some of the more important articles

2007-03-13 05:15:23 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous

Bush to Meet With New Mexican President
By DEB RIECHMANN
AP
MERIDA, Mexico (March 13) - Mexican President Felipe Calderon has a tough message for President Bush : The United States must do more - "much more" - to solve thorny issues of drug-trafficking and immigration .

Bush's five-nation tour of Latin America is acting as a counterweight to Hugo Chavez, Venezuela's leftist leader who is carrying the flag for the leftward shift in Latin America. The Mexican leader has said he's not interested in being Bush's front man for battling Chavez' rising influence.

The biggest hurdle, Bush said, is figuring out what to do with the 12 million illegal immigrants already in the United States. The president has proposed a guest worker plan that would allow legal employment for foreigners and give some illegals a shot at becoming American citizens. Critics say this rewards unlawful behavior.

"There will not be amnesty, automatic citizenship," Bush said Monday in Guatemala before a short flight to Mexico. "It's just not going to happen. Nor is it feasible to try to kick everybody out of our country. That's not possible. And so I'm going to work with members of both parties to find a rational middle ground."

Calderon has lambasted the U.S. decision to build the new border fence - a mix of physical barriers and high-tech virtual fencing. He likens it to the Berlin Wall, and argues that both countries need to improve Mexico's economy to lessen the desire to seek work in the United States.

2007-03-13 05:09:46 · 2 answers · asked by marnefirstinfantry 5

of the British hostages in Ethiopia simply because they were British officials. I am sure that if it was any other ordinary person they would not have been freaking out the way in which they were..

2007-03-13 04:58:11 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous

No-one seems to know who the guy on the new £20 note is.
I would like to see either Churchill or Bobby Moore.

2007-03-13 04:55:24 · 17 answers · asked by Dustbowl Blues 3

2007-03-13 04:41:22 · 2 answers · asked by Carey 2

how does it change your daily life, what are you doing differently, who or what do you blame, and/or what can be done to curtail this?

2007-03-13 04:35:53 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-13 04:21:57 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous

I do what about you?

2007-03-13 04:06:58 · 26 answers · asked by Sir Sidney Snot 6

They were quick enough to dive in to Iraq and would move on one or two others given half a chance. America picks its fights carefully. Considering only self interest. Possibly coz it got wupped in 'Nam' by superior tactics and better organisation. And Iraq is hardly its greatest moment either. It is worth noticing that they gave us in UK, Basra and its airport. Tactically probably thinking it was worse than Baghdad. What a mess Tony and George have made.

2007-03-13 04:05:04 · 17 answers · asked by JOHN 3

Since Bush 2 caused all of their pain and suffering in Iraq by going to war with lies as a justification, why shouldn't he be required to give up the White House to wounded soldiers? Perhaps a little White House caviar and champagne would help improve the morale of the soldiers. Since President Harry Truman lived in Blair House while the White House was being remodeled, I see no reason why the Bushs couldn't live there for the remainder of Bush 2's term of office.

2007-03-13 04:04:08 · 10 answers · asked by In Honor of Moja 4

He still hasn't built that 700 mile fence along our Southern border has he????????

2007-03-13 02:56:47 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous

2007-03-13 02:08:43 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous

Pensioners, Firemen, etc, and me, and donating a days pay to the Nurses who get paid LESS than the men who paint the white lines oon the roads???

2007-03-13 01:15:20 · 13 answers · asked by 'er indoors 2

if another country nuked one of our major cities?

2007-03-13 01:06:45 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous

Do u think that USA is always trying to interfers too much in other ppl's countries affairs?or are they just trying to prove to the rest of the world that they can resolve any kind of problems(even if its not their business)if we need their help.In due respect many of us did applaued their effort in capturing Saddamm Hussein.But aprt from this, they hv not been able to do anything to track down the real culprit-Osama Bin Ladin.Now they hv their hands full having to deal with IRAN and North Korea.The iraq war hv killed na d claimed many american soldiers.Does US really think they hv a final say in wghtever they do or or they jsut being too naive?

2007-03-13 00:08:20 · 7 answers · asked by chasen54 5

2007-03-12 22:25:36 · 7 answers · asked by blacksheep 2

First it was the USA turning their clocks forward. Now Our goverment wants to abolish the 'Stand by' button from all electicals. So we won't be able to record when away/out. Work that one out Blair/Brown!

2007-03-12 22:11:50 · 9 answers · asked by MellowMan 6

Then perhaps if we are to believe this Yahoo news photo many South Americans can readily spot a Nazi and are willing to make a large wanted poster?

http://news.yahoo.com/photo/070312/photos_wl_afp/3611d212357a63ca29d1561ce405e5a6

2007-03-12 19:57:28 · 10 answers · asked by Middy S 2

Im pro choice, and personally, I think people should pay for THEIR OWN abortions. How much is an abortion, like $400?! I really dont think it would be that hard to come up with $400, considering you have up till sometime during the 2nd trimester to get an abortion [i think], so you COULD work up to having $400 dollars.

I already give enough of my money to the gov't/whoever, I'm not paying for someones abortion (cuz thats what it basically is) If you cant afford an abortion, have the kid, thats the choice you make/the price you pay.

2007-03-12 18:54:06 · 4 answers · asked by woah 2

fedest.com, questions and answers