They were quick enough to dive in to Iraq and would move on one or two others given half a chance. America picks its fights carefully. Considering only self interest. Possibly coz it got wupped in 'Nam' by superior tactics and better organisation. And Iraq is hardly its greatest moment either. It is worth noticing that they gave us in UK, Basra and its airport. Tactically probably thinking it was worse than Baghdad. What a mess Tony and George have made.
2007-03-13 04:05:04 · 17 answers · asked by JOHN 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
When Iraq's sorted out, they'll need someone to fight, Mugabe better watch his back.
2007-03-13 04:08:39 · answer #1 · answered by agius1520 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i'm not sure the placement you get that there is extra effective justification than Iraq. Mugabe has no longer invaded or attacked the a number of worldwide places; Iraq did, 2 cases. Mugabe hasn't used chemical weapons on his very own or diverse u . s .'s electorate; Saddam did, 2 cases. Mugabe hasn't supported, funded, and armed international terrorist communities; Saddam has a an prolonged time long checklist of doing certainly that. The UN hasn't exceeded a decision authorizing stress to make Mugabe adjust to inspections; they did with Saddam. Mugabe's dealing are certainly yet yet another community undertaking like optimal of others all over the area that u . s . a . of america would not intercede in. If a similar standards became into become particular no bear in concepts if the U. S. might opt to intercede, we'd on the instant be in touch in Indonesia, Cambodia, Thailand, Myanmar, Tibet, Sri Lanka, optimal of Africa, Venezuela, Colombia, Macedonia, and God knows the placement else.
2016-11-25 00:25:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What makes "ANSWERS" such a really great forum is the chance to get intelligent and thoughtful replies to tough questions.
To-day is a perfect example. The Zimbabwe problem is a most difficult one in which white farmers successful produce large and profitable crops but on land which they only lease from an Independent country. Meanwhile soldiers of that country are given that land and the white settlers displaced.
The rub is that the new native owners do NOT know how to farm very well and many farms are now untilled and left to useless soil.
Sp the questions is asked and KENNETH, QUIZARD and THE INFA give brilliant answers, ones that I will now accept and mention when the subject comes up in conversation.
Congratulations to these and others that have made me better informed on many complex issues.
2007-03-13 04:45:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
America has no interest in Africa, since the Black Hawk Down incident. That will have to be sorted out by Britain and the nato countries.
2007-03-14 01:38:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Zimbabwe has no oil and nothing that the USA or Britian want so Bush and Blair are quite happy to let the innocent people die.
Shows what great and caring men they are!!!!
2007-03-14 12:51:55 · answer #5 · answered by entertainer 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Probably because there's no oil to be had in Uganda. And yes, they have made a right royal mess. Shame they can't stick around long enough to sort it out.
Sorry, meant Zimbabwe but the principle is the same.
2007-03-13 04:13:33 · answer #6 · answered by Roxy 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Most of the problems in the world today are because of American and British meddling in other countries internal affairs!!!
If your country hadn't sent Cecil Rhodes to invade the Ndebele Kingdom back in 1891 and steal the land of the Black farmers and hand it over to White settlers, Zimbabwe wouldn't have the problems it had today.
Robert Mugabe inherited the ugly legacy of British colonial kleptocracy - he had half of the farmland in his country (the most fertile half, of course) in the hands of the decendents of those White criminals - and he had to do something about it.
We can question the methods and details of Mugabe's expropriation of the stolen Zimbabwean farmland, but the fact is he was right to do it.
The greatest mistake Robert Mugabe ever made was that he didn't evict those 1,000 White colonialist farmers the first day of Zimbabwean independence!!!
2007-03-13 04:24:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
that zimbabwe has no oil or gold for bush and co to invade the country by. bush and blair ought to be ashamed of themselves
2007-03-13 10:54:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No oil+it"s already in the financial brown stuff.And the yanks do not know where Zimbabwe is.
2007-03-13 05:10:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Zimbabwe has no oil and is not of ecomomic intrest to the U.S. You don't think this whole war thing is about right and wrong do you.
2007-03-13 04:14:45 · answer #10 · answered by Kenneth H 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋