Since Bush 2 caused all of their pain and suffering in Iraq by going to war with lies as a justification, why shouldn't he be required to give up the White House to wounded soldiers? Perhaps a little White House caviar and champagne would help improve the morale of the soldiers. Since President Harry Truman lived in Blair House while the White House was being remodeled, I see no reason why the Bushs couldn't live there for the remainder of Bush 2's term of office.
2007-03-13 04:04:08 · 10 answers · asked by In Honor of Moja 4 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
There are historical precedents in other countries for my proposal. For example, the Tsar of all the Russias, Nicholas II, and Tsarina Alexandra converted portions of their palace complex in the Imperial retreat at Tsarskoe Selo into hospital facilities. Alexandra and her daughters, the Grand Duchesses, even served as nurses for the wounded Russian soldiers throughout World War I. Why haven't Laura and her daughters done the same?
2007-03-13 04:52:41 · update #1
Wonderfully interesting question and proposal. I'm all for it!!!
2007-03-13 04:11:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
i think of this is attractive and Laura Bush positioned a good number of artwork into finding out on it. The Obamas will cherish the china at the same time as they have formal state dinners. additionally i discover the comments human beings are making offensive, the Bush kinfolk has needed Obama properly and that i think of this is an occasion that multiple the persons who make hateful comments ought to persist with.
2016-11-25 00:25:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did JFK do that for those in Vietnam? Did Abe do it in the Civil War? We have hospitals, and those that treat the wounded should be top of the line, but the problem has been there for a long time. Not just since Bush has been in the White House.
2007-03-13 04:10:56 · answer #3 · answered by Robert and Tanya 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I've got an even better idea. Let george & laura move to the Walter Reed housing that's used for vets waiting for medical treatment!
If it's good enough for our soldiers, why not the president & wife? Don't our troops deserve the best?
2007-03-13 04:19:08 · answer #4 · answered by katydid 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Liberalism is truly a mental disorder when you stoop to putting the blame for a terrorist attack on our shores ..on the only man determined to fight terrorism : G.W. Bush .
You don't see reason . Period .
2007-03-13 09:34:26 · answer #5 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the white house is the white house and a hospital and re-hab facilities are more suitable for injured soldiers. I wish the terrorist would strike us again to remind the liberals what is going on in the world
2007-03-13 04:13:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
no, the white house is a national landmark.....what are they gonna do, open up arlington cemetary to operate on injured soilders. As much as you might hate Bush, let him live there.
2007-03-13 04:12:19 · answer #7 · answered by woah 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Yes, regardless, as they are not doing anything worth while in there anyway...
2007-03-13 04:46:33 · answer #8 · answered by xyz 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
well you are a voice in the wilderness.
2007-03-13 15:40:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO
2007-03-13 04:07:05 · answer #10 · answered by newheartin03 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋